There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/The O’Reilly Factor
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The O’Reilly Factor | Result: Merge[edit]
Delete[edit]
- No citations, all anger. Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk) 16:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- In case people have missed it, there's already an article on Bill O'Reilly. Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 15:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- ~ FluffyRatTomato t 12:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- Pretty obviously, it's based on watching the show. Missional, no substantive reason to delete - David Gerard (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- No one appears to be disputing missionality, if it's missional it's good enough to stay. Christopher (talk) 20:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- If there are no citations, then tag the article with {{Sources needed}}. The article also seems not the best formatted, but outside of those two complaints, I see little reason to delete the article. --It's-a me,
LeftyGreenMario! 02:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, but with a major overhaul and a lot of sources. If you really need someone to do the overhaul, I'll do it. Parrrley 02:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
- It's short enough that it could be summarized and put in a section on the Bill O'Reilly page. While the person and the work are tangentially different topics, there's little enough information on the work to be a footnote. a smol fairy foxgirl (talk) 00:09, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- I'm OK with a merge - David Gerard (talk) 12:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Also a valid option if the subject overlap enough. --It's-a me,
LeftyGreenMario! 22:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Once the odd format is cleaned up and sources are added it would fit as a section in Bill's page. --Cosmikdebris (talk) 00:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Merge what isn't just unfunny hate (BFANJS) into the Bill O'Reilly page. Note to whoever merges: anything extraordinary that is also unsourced hangs by a slender thread, indeed. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 09:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- ClickerClock (talk) 08:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
I suppose there is overlap between Bill O'Reilly and The O'Reilly Factor, though I think the latter can be more focused on the show itself while Bill O'Reilly can be about O'Reilly's other public appearances, but eh. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 19:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)