RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/The Rageholic

The Rageholic | Result: Deleted

The Rageholic (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Music reviewer who has some dumb ideas. Not notable at all and not worth an article. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 16:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
2. Not worthy of an article here. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 20:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
3. Honestly writing articles about dumbasses this irrelevant, really acts more like an ad than anything else. 💜 ASELA^{និយាយ} 💜 00:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
4. Bob^{"Life is short and (insert adjective)"} 10:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
5. No thank you-Hastur! (talk) 06:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Keep

1. Somewhat notorious dumbass, probable fascist based on some of the videos he's put out. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 03:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
2. Heard of him, the article is quality, and he's probably a crank. Tulpa001 (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
3. This lad has 270k subscribers. I'll go ahead and assume most of them are angry young kids, lapping his nonsense up. His post debate analysis got 143,000 views in less than a week. I know a guy who watches these angry, anti-SJW crank videos for the kicks, and arguing with people who are fans of this shit, well... I would agree that our article on him isn't great, but it could potentially be improved to the point where it's like a massive, detailed refutation of him, a go to link for anyone needing to convince one of their friends. Guys like this are a f*cking menace. - Rairyu75 (Talk) 18:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

   Yes, but if we remove all the stupid youtube and twitter drama and leave in what's missional, we're left with a one paragraph stub. A paragraph in one of the pages under RationalWiki:Webshites would be more than enough for this "personality." —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 18:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)