RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Vagina woo
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Vagina woo | Result: Keep[edit]
- Vagina woo – (View log)
Delete[edit]
- This isn't woo. I'd expect a vagina woo page to detail whacky claims about vaginas' mysterious powers. Like, for example, crystals take on healing powers if inserted into one. This page just details a popular misconception. I think that content would only belong on a page just called "vagina". And that page has already been deleted, along with "penis". Spud (talk) 13:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- +1. The only woo listed is just a link to actual woo, the steaming page. Trick (talk) 13:56, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- And move the one factoid there to a more appropriate home. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 15:01, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Move to vagina.Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 15:25, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- These misconceptions are astonishingly common in the manosphere. Keep article because this bullshit is being spouted. Move it if you hate the title. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 14:01, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- There's no "these" there. There is one basic claim, with a few variants. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Needs moar, but is not a bad idea or a bad start. Vaginal steaming should be summarised here too - David Gerard (talk) 15:51, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Meh. Looked it over again, has potential for debunking. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 16:02, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- There's plenty more that could be talked about here; IIRC a couple weeks ago a politician thought you could get a pill into the vagina through the gastrointestinal system, for instance. - Smerdis of Tlön, If you burn with an inner fire, you are already damned. 19:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
- We should rename the site to something along the lines of "Popular misconceptions about genitals" and add nonsense people believe about penises, too.--Arisboch (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- I have heard of these misconceptions in rl a lot.(Both the one about women having lots of sex, and the pregnancy one.) I think that if we keep the article, we could merge the G spot article into this one.Make haste slowly (talk) 22:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)