RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Whitehonor.com

Whitehonor.com | Result: Speedily deleted because "delete" was winning by a landslide and nobody voted to keep it

Whitehonor.com (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. It has been a stub since 2010 (See Fossil Record), so it has existed for far longer than it deserves/The website itself does not exist anymore/Other websites and forums such as StormFront are more notable, active and problematic, this one just seems too generic and obscure for any notability/Additionally, this website is such a nothing burger that it is the first time I have ever heard about it and RW has little to no information on it, meaning that the article is beyond pointless. I only ask for the deletion because it seems to clutter more than anything else when it is a stub article on a website that is both obscure and does not exist anymore, I do not see how keeping this article would benefit anyone. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 18:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
2. If I’d have known it was that old and the website didn’t exist anymore, I’d have just deleted it without an AfD myself. “Hopelessly tiny stub” isn’t a delete reason for nothing. Christopher (talk) 19:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
3. Let's see if this AfD can be nice and peaceful, like all the others...-Flandres (talk) 19:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
4. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 19:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
5. Bongolian (talk) 20:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
6. What honor --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 20:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
7. Hopelessly tiny stub, has outlived its purpose by years. --Goatspeed. _{Stalk me}CircularRasoning^{See what I'm planning} 20:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)