RationalWiki:Articles for demotion/Drake equation

Drake equation | Result: Rapid 6-0 consensus to demote, demoted

Drake equation (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Demotion to silver

1. I believe the article should be demoted to silver. My reason being that I think the article is a lot better than it was before I started going WikiOgre on it. The reason I left a large chunk of the section explaining the Drake equation proper uncited is cause it honestly doesn't need it, and any of the references I added would just say the same thing more or less. This wiki allows for original research after all, and we are not an encyclopedia. Vee (talk) 05:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
2. Yeah I’ll back silver. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 19:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
3. Looks good to me. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 23:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
4. This article looks good to me. ConverginglyRational (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
5. Satisfactory.Andrew5 (talk) 21:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
6. Good enough for me. GeeJayK^{Where all evil dwells} _{Where every lie is true} 21:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Goat

• What is the proposal for, exactly? Andrew5 (talk) 13:16, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

  Demotion to silver. Vee (talk) 17:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

• How illustrated is illustrated enough for Silver? I'm not sure if the Drake Equation actually needs any more pictures than it already has, but just want to be pedantic. CorruptUser 14:17, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

  Given how the article deals in purely theoretical topics, I think the level of illustration it already has is more than sufficient. Vee (talk) 19:28, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

• Wow, that was quick. Clear consensus to demote. Andrew5 (talk) 23:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)