Talk:Alt-right glossary

	This Alt-right related article has been awarded GOLD status for quality. Please keep this in mind when editing the article. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Cover Story This article is, among others, randomly included on the Main Page. Please keep this in mind and be sure that your edits are of the quality that this implies. Its front-page abstract can be found here and its editnotice here.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>

, (new)

Postcolonialism

Is this really ever used as a synonym for postmodernism or Cultural Marxism? Never seen it. Maybe used by right-wing movements in non-Western countries? All I could think of. Chillpilled (talk) 22:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

I'd delete it unless someone can come up with a citation. Bongolian (talk) 02:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

DEI

@Bongolian removed a section about "DEI" from the article. No real reason was given for its removal, so I've tentatively put it back, but I'm still not 100% sure that it belongs on the page (it was added by a BoN, which means there's a real possibility of trolling that I didn't notice, and I'm also not sure of its relevance to an alt-right glossary). Anyone have a third opinion to offer? --Luigifan18 (talk) 00:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

The section was added without any citations and looks like a drive-by troll piece. I agree with Bongo's assessment and removal. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 01:04, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I rewrote a fair bit of it. Hopefully it looks a bit better now. I don't think it quite fits the alt-right either (it's more in the critical race theory category and being pushed by certain institutions and reactionaries) but I don't know where else to put it.BobJohnson (talk) 01:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I deleted the initial section on DEI because it had no citations and gave no evidence that there is anything specific to the alt-right that is not also in the milieu of US conservativism. There are now citations, but still no argument that it is in any way specific to the alt-right. I think it should either be removed or moved to a separate page at this point. Bongolian (talk) 02:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't really have any objections to that. --Luigifan18 (talk) 02:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Moved to its own article, DEI. (@Patty Pat) If people think it's more appropriate for the alt-right glossary, fine, but I personally concur with Bongolian. BobJohnson (talk) 15:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

That was an accident. Sorry. Patty Pat 18:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Unrelated to the article itself, but...

The Talk Page's archive is busted; The list of sections is there, but there's only one section actually present for some reason. TheOneAndOnlyCirrusMan (talk) 18:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Fixed. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 19:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Cobson

Looks like a new Wojak-like has dropped. I'm not sure what it's intended to mean, but I've seen several references to "Cobson won" from apparent right-wingers in response to a new Innuendo Studios video, and I found this bizarre, uh... game? Does anyone know what this meme is about? I found this on Know Your Meme, and it seems related to "Ack!", but this is otherwise new to me, and, it would seem, this page. Twentydragon (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Superfluous, I promise. We truly don't need an entry for every soyjak derivative. Chillpilled (talk) 15:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Fair, but a redirect might be useful. Twentydragon (talk) 16:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

I don't quite get what the 'Cobson won' thing has to do with the video, though I haven't yet watched it. TheOneAndOnlyCirrusMan (talk) 17:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I have watched the video, and I don't get the connection either. I suspect it has nothing to do with that video and instead is referring to a previous video, an exchange between Danskin and somebody else, a far-right figure sending their followers to flood Danskin's comments, or some combination of those three. Twentydragon (talk) 10:47, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

About the 41%/40% section

I think it should also be worth mentioning that some use a farcical 50%/52% statistic (Because bigots can't even get their own bullshit straight, who could've possibly seen this coming!); I sadly don't have sources on hand (Nor do I want to seek them out), but if you argue with this kind of person frequently, you will probably see it sooner or later. TheOneAndOnlyCirrusMan (talk) 17:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC)