Talk:Bo Winegard

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon race.svg

This Racialism related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Archives for this talk page: , (new)


Dodgy sources defending Bo Winegard after his sacking[edit]

The list so far

The areomagazine piece was written by a Quillette writer, Chris Ferguson John66 (talk) 20:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Lmao, “Don’t judge me, but I still believe in spanking". I think Ferguson warrants his own article on RW.

John66 (talk) 20:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

"Bias"[edit]

This page is biased. I have created a page for Bo Winegard at Wikipedia to counteract the left-wing bias on here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo_Winegard

Hciam Hciam (talk) 19:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

@Hciam You don't know how to use the word "biased" correctly do you? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:14, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
An example of the correct use would be that you exhibit a parasocial bias for Mr. Winegard's opinions that hampers your ability to remain objective. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I was banned on Wikipedia but I have a clean account now, I am untouchable. I will be creating Wikipedia articles for all the race realist scientists you have smeared on this website. My Wikipedia creations will counteract all the RationalWiki articles you have written for Quillette people. Hciam (talk) 19:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I'll be happy to alert Wikipedia to your confession. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Banned on Wikipedia? Does it relate to what you're doing? Also you'll find Wikipedia will ask the same we ask of you: support your claims as which includes removing content in our article. "It's biased" is among the laziest arguments people have trotted out here. There's logic being appealed to here but it's an empty statement, a "I am convincing" platitude, conveys nothing else. Wikipedia probably gets that accusation all the time too, but only substantiated ones get attention. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 19:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
You are left-wing traitors, you are destroying the white race. Bo Winegard and other race realists are on the front-line doing active race research whilst you guys just sit behind your keyboards smearing them. I have had hundreds of accounts on Wikipedia, I am active on the race and intelligence or Race (human categorization) talk-page every years. My last account was blocked a few days ago but I use a VPN service and they can never track me. They didn't even connect that account to my main. You have no chance of getting me banned on there. I always win against the left-wingers. Hciam (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I am so envious of you, what an amazing role model you are. Instead of being behind the keyboard smearing race realists, we should all follow your example and be behind the keyboard being banned on Wikipedia, putting up sockpuppet accounts, and writing up shitty racist pseudoscience. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 19:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Nazis didn't win World War II. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 19:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
They could have won World War II if they ran sockpuppet accounts on Wikipedia and bitched about left wingers on RationalWiki. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 19:42, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Oh by the way, this fucker's article runs the risk of being deleted and Wikipedia editors have obliterated your little article. Try harder. Don't worry though, I will vandal bin you again if you dare, so I will win again. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 19:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Lol the Bo Winegard Wikipedia article will never be deleted, nor will I be banned because I always create new accounts. You have autism and you are bi-racial with no racial identity. Is that you why spend your life on this website smearing white academics? You have no science education or degree. You lefties were clueless. Kuiet (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Honestly, I doubt Wikipedia will delete the article if the subject is worth documenting. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 20:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Continue with your slacktivism, then. We'll see how that'll take you in life. Oh by the way, we won again by blocking another sock account. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 20:37, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
But Mike, don't They control Google? Why not check the one true search engine, DuckDuckGo? Spoiler, our article is higher there. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 03:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Looks like a Smith impersonation. Pathology (talk) 05:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A mod may want to perm lock the page[edit]

The Winegard's keep complaining on social media about their articles hence why people keep coming here to vandalise. I reverted edits of an IP. REllis (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Response to RationalWiki[edit]