Talk:Invisible Pink Unicorn
How can something that is invisible have color?--¿ Sta’le ? 23:53, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
- Heretic!69.216.99.159
- To Know in Faith is All that is required - obviously. Blasphemer! humanbe in 23:58, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
- I thought it was Invisible pink unicorn. Totnesmartin 14:51, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- Call me just plain stoopid, but last night I was describing my UXB and the image to a friend, and corrected myself from purple to pink. And so I knew exactly what you were going to say when I saw the edit summary ("which one's pink?" HAHAHA) The article should be moved. The I-Purple-U is her gay brother, equally revered by some, but not the same creature down before whom all should prostrate themselves. Or, at least bring some tasty oats. PBUH, humanbe in 14:55, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- I thought it was Invisible pink unicorn. Totnesmartin 14:51, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- To Know in Faith is All that is required - obviously. Blasphemer! humanbe in 23:58, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
Meet metamaterial cloaking. Take a pink unicorn. Use metamaterial cloaking to bend light around the unicorn. Light cannot reflect off the unicorn, so it is effectively invisible. Ta-da! Invisible pink unicorn. The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Heretics![edit]
True believers know that the Herselfness, actually has two horns, as can clearly not be seen in the picture. CЯacke® 16:16, 7 September 2007 (CDT)
For me, explanations of parodies are unneccessary.— Unsigned, by: 83.144.95.66 / talk / contribs
Does this qualify for tax exemption ? Apparently (according to Richard Dawkins) only monotheistic religions attract charitable status, so the introduction of an Invisible Purple Unicorn as Her brother could seriously jeopardise our tax position. Should we start a war? Dreadnought 19:45, 13 December 2007 (EST)
- As long as Her followers understand the mystery that Two are One and that One is Two, there should be no untoward tax ramifications. human 20:14, 13 December 2007 (EST)
- Plenty of polytheistic pagan groups get the church tax status, at least in the US. Researcher 20:19, 13 December 2007 (EST)
So no war then, huh ? Dreadnought 12:45, 14 December 2007 (EST)
Gender?[edit]
Should we use gender-neutral pronouns for it due to the lack of obserability of the gender-sepcific features? If the feminine form is to be kept, please list the steps to identifying (invoking faith probably will put up an immediate schism, one referring IPU as masculine and the other one feminine) the gender of the IPU. [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 20:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Excuse me, if the unicorn is pink then it has to be female, ask any five year old girl. Bob Soles (talk) 20:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- indeed , the Invisible Purple Unicorn, while honored is himself not the deity, and is unquestionably a type of blue as befits a boy. Hamster (talk) 20:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Why can't she be intersex? Blue (is useful) 21:22, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ey/em/eir Тайговорить 21:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Let's not inflict Spivak upon RW. Blue (is useful) 21:31, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ey/em/eir Тайговорить 21:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Why can't she be intersex? Blue (is useful) 21:22, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- indeed , the Invisible Purple Unicorn, while honored is himself not the deity, and is unquestionably a type of blue as befits a boy. Hamster (talk) 20:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
So...[edit]
Is My Little Pony some kind of Gnostic cult? --TheLateGatsby (talk) 13:49, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Apparently Pinkie Pie leads Her very own cult. Sounds legit, considering she's a psychotic tiny horse capable of breaking the 4th Wall. Zexcoiler Kingbolt (talk) 22:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Zexcoiler Kingbolt