User talk:110.144.61.146

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, anonymous editor! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun! While you are free to continue to edit as, and be identified by, your IP address, you might prefer to create an account (they're free!), or log in if you already have one. If you create an account, your IP address will not be displayed and you will face fewer editing restrictions.

1. The alt-right don't need to be beaten, they're a tiny fringe group and will remain so.
2. Milo Yiannopoulos is a cunt whose opinions on everything are completely irrelevant.

Christopher (talk) 20:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

If the alt right doesn't need to be beaten and is such a small fringe group, why are there so many references to them on this website (including on "What is Going On?")?

Calling someone a vulgarity is not a refutation of their viewpoint, and saying someone's opinions hold no value when that very person has a New York Times best seller and has done sold out shows in the USA (and Australia as well) is specious at best and blantantly absurd at worst. --110.144.61.146 (talk) 23:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

You are both right here. The alt-right is a tiny fringe group whose digital presence misrepresents its actual influence. Why? Because the term is being used as a buzzword for, "those assholes who believe shit that makes me mad."

That's right--you're wrong! Vulgarity is not refutation but exasperation. Milo is a comedian, not like Jerry Seinfeld, but he makes fun of people who believe X, like an ordinary comedian. We don't think he's that funny. Also, the opinions of a comedian don't have to be valuable, just funny, to somebody willing to pay to hear them. The Breitbart alt-right appears to have dumped him, so maybe the people who like him now are different. The set of all troubled persons is huge and includes alt-righters as a tiny subset.Ariel31459 (talk) 02:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The term should not be used as a buzzword in my opinion, it should only be used on those people who actually are alt right, otherwise it can descend into a situation where anyone and everyone that a person disagrees with suddenly become "alt right".

He'a not a comedian, and I don't think he would consider himself a comedian. The better word to describe him is satirist - he uses humour at times to get his point across.

He is not with Breitbart, Breitbart are not alt right, and Steve Bannon (uncle Steve) did not dump him.

What do you mean when you write that the people who maybe like him are different and the set of all troubled person should is huge? --110.144.61.146 (talk) 02:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

The video you posted is from September 2016. Please do not add entries to the WIGO:Blogs page if they are from longer than one month ago. The section was called "December 2017" for a reason. CowHouse (talk) 11:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

I don't mind disagreements at all, and I like the discussion going, but keep up the edit warring and we'll have no choice but to block you; make the edits only after we've come to the consensus. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓^(T|C) 04:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)