User talk:Ajuk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Elassint Throw things at me 15:49, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
- No hard feelings on the WP article? tmtoulouse annoy 15:51, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
"Why not come on over?"[edit]
Because what Liberapedia is trying to be already exists. Why don't you guys come over here? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 10:06, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
- No I think we're different enough! --Ajuk 10:14, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
- Really? How? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 10:15, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
The funniest part is that LP doesn't even have an article about Penn and Teller. Oh dear oh dear oh dear... <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 10:26, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
- No I put it there by mistake.--Ajuk 10:51, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
- I made your template a little more snarky, as well. It didn't seem RWish enough as it was.
- Which Liberapedia is the real one, by the way? Elassint changed the link in our Liberapedia article to point to the new one, but your template links to the old one, doesn't it? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Tsubasa-Jelly 10:54, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
- RationalWiki doesn't have the political articles that Liberapedia has. Also at Liberapedia there are no Jellyfish to sting users. Both Liberapedias are real. Proxima Centauri 05:28, 11 July 2008 (EDT)
- That may be true, but RationalWiki is a (slowly) growing site, while Liberapedia is a painfully static one. As a result, we have a larger and more diverse base of editors to draw from. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:47, 11 July 2008 (EDT)
- Rationalwiki is sometimes hard for new users. Liberapedia is friendly and political. All freethinking sites must work together. The christians want to silence us but we speak there. Come join us. ħuman 04:51, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
- You sounded like Proxima Centuari there, Human. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 17:54, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
- How is RationalWiki hard for new users? I can't help improve on that aspect if I don't know the problem. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 17:54, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
- Rationalwiki is sometimes hard for new users. Liberapedia is friendly and political. All freethinking sites must work together. The christians want to silence us but we speak there. Come join us. ħuman 04:51, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
- That may be true, but RationalWiki is a (slowly) growing site, while Liberapedia is a painfully static one. As a result, we have a larger and more diverse base of editors to draw from. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:47, 11 July 2008 (EDT)
- RationalWiki doesn't have the political articles that Liberapedia has. Also at Liberapedia there are no Jellyfish to sting users. Both Liberapedias are real. Proxima Centauri 05:28, 11 July 2008 (EDT)
- No I put it there by mistake.--Ajuk 10:51, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
Muse?[edit]
No. Not really. PFoster 16:46, 17 December 2008 (EST)