User talk:C6541/Archive1

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, C6541!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Welcome to the goat-botherer. Remember to wipe your feet. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 05:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

You keep doing stuff.[edit]

You know, like, stuff. Acei9 07:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


Use -webkit-border-radius for webkit browsers and border-radius for Opera 10.50 and future browsers. Note that the css3 draft and webkit's implementation use a different naming scheme than mozilla, i.e. border-bottom-left-radius, not border-radius-bottomleft. -- Nx / talk 08:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

PROTIP 2[edit]

You don't have to enter an edit summary when creating a redirect, the software will automatically summarize your edit if you leave the summary empty. -- Nx / talk 09:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


Good cleanups. You are a worthy janitor around here. Researcher (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

That's what I came here to say... ħumanUser talk:Human 02:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
It's not a big deal, but don't you think mdashes look better when framed with two spaces — I do.? ħumanUser talk:Human 04:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure, but I think some of your "typo" fixes might just be changing from British to American spelling (or vice versa--I can never keep track of which uses two r's and which uses 1.) Researcher (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
It took me 30 years to learn which was right - ise or ize... then I started editing here, and the Brits who run this place have totally screwed up my sense of spilleng. Bastids. ħumanUser talk:Human 10:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Pat on the back[edit]

Waves.gifGood job cleaning up typos and the like around here! Waves.gifWaves2.gif Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 03:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:What the Goon said. You rock. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Great Job... but[edit]

Can someone give this account Bot status until it's done? :) –SuspectedReplicant retire me 00:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Will do. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
You're a bot now--won't appear by default on recent changes. Abuse it and I will have you walrus-raped. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
That's nice, but if you're going to use this account for anything other than typo fixing and cleanup using AWB, you cannot be a bot. I recommend you create a separate account which we can then bot. Also it's a good idea to give us a heads up when you go on an editing spree, so that we can check your edits. I doubt anyone here checks bot edits, and I'm not saying this because I suspect you might insert vandalism or parody stealthily, but because you might make mistakes or edits that are not uncontroversial. -- Nx / talk 08:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm keeping a mild weather eye on our friend. I use my watchlist as my RW anchor, and don't click on "don't show bot edits". I did catch one odd mistake, but it's because I know how the wiki was built that I caught it. English-only was written by language mavens, so the odds of it having a typo were zero. So far Cxxxx is just being a strange kind of friendly, useful editor. You or anyone else can always click on their contribs and check a few, it's not like RC is the only way to track wiki activity. ħumanUser talk:Human 08:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)