There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Want a cup?
Greetings, Coffee, and thank you for joining our shadowy cabal of fanatical Gamecubes. I hope you enjoy your time here. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 08:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you.--Coffee (talk) 09:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
You're in charge now.
- Thank you very much. I shall put these keys in a drawer and never use them.--Coffee (talk) 19:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Pat on the back
- Well, urr, thank you very much.--Coffee (talk) 11:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Could you take a look at the latest post on http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:PaulRJ
You have at least been reasonable
PaulRJ 08:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
If you're impressed by that bet
- At least they are explicit. The one I'm complaining about could be paraphrased as "Some notable political event will occur somewhere in Europe within 10 years". Furthermore made by an IP who almost certainly won't be around or identifiable in 10 years. It's a waste of space on the page.--Coffee (talk) 08:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)