User talk:Dark Matter Glaucopis
Greetings, Glaucopis! -- Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 13:40, 6 March 2008 (EST)
Thank you, Radioactive Afikomen. Dark Matter Glaucopis 13:49, 6 March 2008 (EST)
- Welcome to the Dollhouse! human 16:19, 6 March 2008 (EST)
Thank you, Human. Dark Matter Glaucopis 16:23, 6 March 2008 (EST)
- Greetings from RatWiki's local friendly Hiver! Spica 16:43, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
- What is a Hiver? Dark Matter Glaucopis 16:44, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
- Don't get him on that for Drake's sake - He'll fill the wiki with explanations.
(See my old talk page(Susanpurrrrr 16:50, 10 March 2008 (EDT)- Don't need to - there's a Wikia full of it already! XD http://traveller.wikia.com/wiki/Hiver Spica 16:58, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
- I see. Thank you, Spica. Dark Matter Glaucopis 17:00, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
- You're welcome! Nice Tragic: The Blathering designs, btw :) Spica 17:16, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
- I see. Thank you, Spica. Dark Matter Glaucopis 17:00, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
- Don't need to - there's a Wikia full of it already! XD http://traveller.wikia.com/wiki/Hiver Spica 16:58, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
- Don't get him on that for Drake's sake - He'll fill the wiki with explanations.
- What is a Hiver? Dark Matter Glaucopis 16:44, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
Come pretend to debate Bohdan at user talk:AmesG with me![edit]
human 22:29, 12 March 2008 (EDT)
- Yes. Dark Matter Glaucopis 22:30, 12 March 2008 (EDT)
Apology!![edit]
You APOLOGISED to B****n! are you ill? Susanpurrrrr 04:18, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- Why shouldn't I? It was not my intention to offend him. Dark Matter Glaucopis 04:26, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- TmtamesP (formerly Bohdan) is very unpopular around here, so apologizing to him for anything is considered unusual. I, however, applaud your etiquette. -- Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 04:31, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- I am unpopular around here? Oh noes! TmtamesP 13:46, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- Thank you, Radioactive Afikomen. Dark Matter Glaucopis 04:33, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- Bohdan isn't unpopular, he's just... special... he is like having the incarnation of the anti-goat around. human 15:16, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- TmtamesP (formerly Bohdan) is very unpopular around here, so apologizing to him for anything is considered unusual. I, however, applaud your etiquette. -- Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 04:31, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
SHAME![edit]
(on me!) Aaargh! possessive apostrophe - don't tell please :) Susanpurrrrr 06:57, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- Okay. Dark Matter Glaucopis 06:59, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
Bullet lists[edit]
Have you been adding periods/full stops to bullet lists? Because they don't need them, if they aren't complete sentence form, and the little dots often look a bit silly. Wondering if you're working from a MoS concept I need to be educated about...? human 19:29, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- No, I only thought it looked neater. Allow me to remove them. Dark Matter Glaucopis 19:33, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- Ah ok... thanks. I guess it is mostly a matter of taste, since we technically don't have a MoS here! human 19:46, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
Anti-Zionism[edit]
Does this mean that everyone who disagree's with the state of Israel is an anti-semite in your book? MarcusCicero 17:06, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- No. The redirect was based on the logic that the Anti-Semitism article contains all our information about Anti-Zionism. Dark Matter Glaucopis 17:09, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
Thanks and good luck with your work![edit]
Glad you don't hate us :-).-αmεσ (soldier) 22:28, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, we'll miss you, be sure to email when it's time to come back! human 22:48, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
- Thank you. Dark Matter Glaucopis 04:53, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
Hi[edit]
You can have your computer back now. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Chaos! 23:59, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
- Oh, I see. Thank you. Is there something wrong? Dark Matter Glaucopis 09:56, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
Welcome back! Do you want your sysopship returned to you? Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 16:21, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
- I don't believe I have ever been a sysop here, in fact. Dark Matter Glaucopis 15:51, 17 October 2008 (EDT)
- O_O I would've sworn you were at some point. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 18:22, 17 October 2008 (EDT)
- You are now. TheoryOfPractice 19:53, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
- Thank you, TheoryOfPractice. However, I would really prefer not to be a sysop. Dark Matter Glaucopis 19:55, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
- You are now. TheoryOfPractice 19:53, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
- O_O I would've sworn you were at some point. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 18:22, 17 October 2008 (EDT)
As you wish. TheoryOfPractice 20:02, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
- Thank you. Dark Matter Glaucopis 20:03, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
- Welcome back! ħuman 20:42, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
- Thank you, Human. Dark Matter Glaucopis 20:44, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
- Welcome back! ħuman 20:42, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
Minor[edit]
You seem to have "Mark all edits minor by default" checked in your preferences. Could you uncheck it please. yummy & honey(or marmalade) 22:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Dark Matter Glaucopis (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Cheers! yummy & honey(or marmalade)
Question[edit]
Do you still not want to be a sysop? It's the default position around here. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐMethinks it is a Weasel 21:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- I have no preference. Thank you for asking. Dark Matter Glaucopis (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- The thing is done. Guidelines are here. Enjoy. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐMethinks it is a Weasel 21:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, Weaseloid. Dark Matter Glaucopis (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐMethinks it is a Weasel 21:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, Weaseloid. Dark Matter Glaucopis (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- The thing is done. Guidelines are here. Enjoy. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐMethinks it is a Weasel 21:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Evidence against a recent creation[edit]
You just seem to have burned through the article removing links (red ones, I suppose). OK, I buy removing coral, but many of those others might be good articles perhaps? Definitely a couple I saw. Red links aren't inherently evil. What do you think? Hmmm, maybe I should have asked this on the article talk page... Palindrome (talk) 05:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
- I created those red links in this edit. They were only articles I assumed would already exist. Dark Matter Glaucopis (talk) 05:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)