Information icon.svg Results for the 2023 RationalWiki Moderator Election have now been posted. Thank you for participating in this election, and congratulations to the winners!

User talk:Diadochus

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Diadochus!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

My name[edit]

Strange name, you didn't mean Diadochos did you? Redchuck.gif ГенгисRationalWiki GOLD member 06:47, 15 January 2009 (EST)

Hi Genghis - I don't know, actually. I took what I imagined to be the singular of "Diadochi," or, the peers of Alexander the Great during his conquests. -Diadochus 16:46, 15 January 2009 (EST)
'Tis Greek, not Latin. Phantom Hoover 16:48, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Ah, Hoover, 'tis both. "Diadochi" is the latinization of the Greek "Diadokhi," or so sayeth that repository of anti-family liberal bias Wikipedia.-Diadochus 16:49, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Ah, but I have only studied Latin, and it would seem that someone is using something other than the nominative here. Phantom Hoover 16:51, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Bah. That article was clearly the work of liberal parodists. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 16:53, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Fine, you have caught me. I have a year of college Latin tops, and little more history, but I like the name :). What should it have been? Hopefully I accidentally declined it in the vocative. Having a name that translates "O, Successor of Alexander!" would be AWESOME.-Diadochus
Actually, according to my Latin textbook, it could be 2nd declension nominative plural, which would make sense. Phantom Hoover 16:56, 15 January 2009 (EST)
I wish I could help you with that; I took two years of Latin in high school, but I've forgotten most of it. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 16:57, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Don't worry Diadoche, you're on solid ground. Phantom Hoover 16:59, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Should I add a new entry to the "differences with Wikipedia" entry at CP, indicating, "unlike Wikipedia, Conservapedia never gets its f#%*(&(&% Latin wrong"?-Diadochus 17:04, 15 January 2009 (EST)
But Wikipedia was right in this case. Phantom Hoover 17:05, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Wasn't there a scene based on this in "Life of Brian?" CorryNo, what I'm calling you is a television actor. 08:37, 16 January 2009 (EST)


See, I told you, the right word is "condolences" when being made a sysop. hold on a moment, I'll dig up the paperwork for you. TheoryOfPractice 17:35, 18 January 2009 (EST)

Ah, here it is. Now you can vandal-bin offenders, too. It's easy. TheoryOfPractice 17:37, 18 January 2009 (EST)
YOU FOOLS! Cower before my "special pages"! In other words... thanks, I think!-Diadochus 17:38, 18 January 2009 (EST)
Holy crap, the vandal bin thing is a great idea. Why doesn't CP use that to create a more friendly atmosphere? Then again i suppose that's not their point...-Diadochus 17:39, 18 January 2009 (EST)
"to create a more friendly atmosphere" a-hahahahahahahahahah. You crack me up. TheoryOfPractice 17:40, 18 January 2009 (EST)
If the CPers could press a button and make wandals' computers explode, they would. Why whould they want a LESS stringent punishment? --Gulik 17:49, 18 January 2009 (EST)
I just got this great mental picture of Karajou range-exploding all of Oxford's computers.-Diadochus 17:52, 18 January 2009 (EST)


Why remove the xref? I thought it was quite Logical.--Tolerance 15:40, 28 February 2009 (EST)

I didn't see what the Villainy guide had in common to your article.-Diadochus 15:41, 28 February 2009 (EST)
There were two links. One to another RW Article. As to the Relevance, all three articles talk about Infiltrating wikis.--Tolerance 16:04, 28 February 2009 (EST)
They are, but not in anything close to the same manner. The Villainist's guide is about subverting the rules by becoming the only person they protect; your guide is about using our much broader rules to be contrarian, but honestly so.-Diadochus 21:02, 28 February 2009 (EST)