User talk:Edit filter/Archive1
Welcome[edit]
Because bots have feelings too. --PsyGremlinKhuluma! 14:06, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- This filter needs tweaking... it's treating some non-spam as spam.Nullahnung (talk) 01:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- What non-spam is it treating as spam? 04:04, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- I see 1 in 35 hits that was a false positive. I also unfortunately can't tweak the filter without breaking it. 04:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- I believe we are all thinking of the same false positive hit. Can't find any clue why that editor tripped the filter, not with the info available at this comfy armchair. I trust that the matter is in capable hands, and will keep eyes open from time to time. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 15:37, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- I've been editing from my phone or I would have taken care of adding the edit back in and unlocking the address. I'll do that tonight. Sprocket - what's the single unifying characteristic of all the "Hi my name is Anna Chung I play the accordion and collect ants" spam posts? 17:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe we're not thinking of the same one after all. I saw an IP trip the filter, not a named account. The consistent formatting of "my hobby is linking to search results for learning Xhosa" type posts needs no mention. I'll say no more, but thanks! Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 17:19, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- I've been editing from my phone or I would have taken care of adding the edit back in and unlocking the address. I'll do that tonight. Sprocket - what's the single unifying characteristic of all the "Hi my name is Anna Chung I play the accordion and collect ants" spam posts? 17:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- I believe we are all thinking of the same false positive hit. Can't find any clue why that editor tripped the filter, not with the info available at this comfy armchair. I trust that the matter is in capable hands, and will keep eyes open from time to time. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 15:37, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- I see 1 in 35 hits that was a false positive. I also unfortunately can't tweak the filter without breaking it. 04:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- What non-spam is it treating as spam? 04:04, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Don't welcome it! It'll become sentient! SophieWilder 15:42, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- In the movies, treating the monster with kindness is the only thing that might save us.--"Shut up, Brx." 17:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Unblock Please[edit]
I was blocked for vandalism, but as far as I know it was a false positive. Unblock please. I am User:RationalPsycho
- You should be unblocked as of 22:05? I hit the thing a couple minutes ago. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 22:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Unblock Please[edit]
Apparently you blocked me User:Bloomingdedalus automatically for placing a link on my user page. I didn't know I wasn't allowed to put links on my user page. — Unsigned, by: Bloomingdedalus2 / talk / contribs
I'm blocked User:NerdyWizard, I too did not know that I couldn't put links on my user page. Please unblock me so I can put a pithy quote of some kind. — Unsigned, by: NerdyWizard / talk / contribs
- I already unblocked you, no worries. Nullahnung (talk) 14:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- You can do whatever you want to your userpage. You just can't add links until you have three edits. 15:15, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Should it be including internal links? Peter mqzp 00:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- You can do whatever you want to your userpage. You just can't add links until you have three edits. 15:15, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Infinite blocks for IPs are probably bad[edit]
The edit filter bot's blocking IPs indefinitely. This is probably a bad idea. (It's hitting Tor exit nodes today, from our latest serial filter-triggerer.) - David Gerard (talk) 13:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- I personally saw it as a "block this guy 'til he gets bored, then unblock the ip" kinda thing, but anyway. DØØM MĖSSIÅH …But spirit is foulest, devoid, askew 14:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Unblocking will invariably never hapen--Miekal 14:04, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- I've been figuring a few days is enough. We do want to allow proxy/Tor editing in general (it seems). Though my tears for future Tor editors are rather sparse - David Gerard (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Gerard here. However, if I remember correctly, the setting for how long the edit filter blocks something is in localsettings.php. Therefore, it would be up to David or Trent to set this. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 19:06, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Is it?? That sounds odd ... just having a look - David Gerard (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Can't see anything of that sort there ... just reading the manual - David Gerard (talk) 21:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Look under the configuration portion. It's the $wgAbuseFilterBlockDuration setting, which is at indefinte by default. It's at the very bottom of that section. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yep. I'll set it to a week for today, though I think really we want to indefinite on names and days for IPs ... I'll ask on mediawiki-l for ideas - David Gerard (talk) 22:03, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Actually set to 314159 seconds, per local custom - David Gerard (talk) 22:13, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- A-ha! It's undocumented, but there in the code and WMF settings: $wgAbuseFilterAnonBlockDuration. Anon is 314159 seconds, named is back to indefinite - David Gerard (talk) 23:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Look under the configuration portion. It's the $wgAbuseFilterBlockDuration setting, which is at indefinte by default. It's at the very bottom of that section. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Gerard here. However, if I remember correctly, the setting for how long the edit filter blocks something is in localsettings.php. Therefore, it would be up to David or Trent to set this. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 19:06, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
You blocked 141 for 3.6 days[edit]
S/he's a respected BON. What triggered? FrothyCatPotato (talk/stalk) 21:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
"Nazi scumbag" filter[edit]
I tried to reply to a nazi BoN on the talkpage of Race, and (I assume) it thought I was posting their post, and it blocked me. Seems like something that should be fixed, if possible. Frederick♠♣♥♦ 04:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'll take a look at it. I was hoping somebody would trigger it sooner or later so I could find out what it would do (since I programmed it, the person it was meant to stop hasn't been back). I've taken some measure to fix the problem. Thanks for letting me know, and I apologize for the inconvenience. Gooniepunk (talk) 05:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)