User talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton
- Thank you. May I take it you are a potential contributor?--Hillary Rodham Clinton 18:42, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- Well, I gave $25 to your husband in 1992, which got me annual holiday cards from Al & his lovely family. If somehow you get the Dem nomination (or are on the ticket for VP) some of my money will pass near your coffers, at the least. ħψɱɐ₦ 19:46, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- HRC? *Here*, on RW? Suspicious, methinks. But anyhoo, sorry Hils old girl, I'm a Brit and you're not left enough for me to send you any money. Toodle-oo, pip-pip, tadaa wack and tally ho :) Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 18:49, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- If there is some particular policy you'd like me to bring forward then please tell me.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 18:51, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- OK, I'm not 100% convinced you *are* HRC, but hey, I'll bite (and apologies if you really are HRC :D ): universal healthcare paid for by the direct taxation of the working population, free at the point of delivery; a complete ban on private citizens owning weapons in every state of the US; the discrete "disposal" of Andrew Schlafly, the worst advert for America, ever (if the IRA can make people "disappear", I'm sure the FBI/CIA/USSS can, too). That should keep you busy for a while :) Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 19:04, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- If there is some particular policy you'd like me to bring forward then please tell me.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 18:51, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
I promise to work on the helthcare one.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 09:21, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
Some advice[edit]
Quit immediately if you value your dignity. Do it now! --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 18:58, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- If she valued her dignity, she'd never have gotten this far. The American political system is designed to systematically cull any candidates who are unable to debase themselves sufficiently. --Gulik
- Have Obama assassinated, then eulogise and cry at his funeral. Promise to win the election "for him". Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)Approach the Presence 21:54, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- Which movie was that? ħψɱɐ₦ 23:17, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- I just made that one up off the top of my head. Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)Approach the Presence 06:52, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
- Thank you all for taking the time to and being concerned enough to offer advice. I shall, of course, consult with my advisers but it is always useful to the the opinion of the man or woman on the street.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 09:24, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
- I just made that one up off the top of my head. Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)Approach the Presence 06:52, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
- Which movie was that? ħψɱɐ₦ 23:17, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- Have Obama assassinated, then eulogise and cry at his funeral. Promise to win the election "for him". Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)Approach the Presence 21:54, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
Stain remover[edit]
As a housewife, perhaps you could help me with just a little household tip? I have a dress that needs a small stain removed from it - it's just a little bit of material of organic origin, white/clear in original colour. Oh, the dress is blue, so I don't want the colour to run. Can you advise? DogP 19:14, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- Do you really think that spelling it British in this case fools anyone? ħψɱ₦ 19:48, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- Human: wot, exactly, are you talking about? Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 19:54, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- The same thing that "DogP", if that is her real name, is talking about. ħψɱɐ₦ 19:58, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- (Human, why did you change your sig to hymen - is it a sign of something , I wonder? ContribsTalk 20:02, 24 May 2008 (EDT))
- Huw: ta for that but HRC's own webstile spells her name with 2 Ls. Susan: big LOLz XD Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 20:06, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- @Spica, haha, very funny. You know what I mean! @Susan, that's an upsilon, not an ypsilon! Also, how does "ɐ" read as "e"? Oh well.... the same thought occurred to me, but the damn anarchy image made my sig break at line endings... ħψɱɐ₦ 20:10, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- Ta again, Huw - just spotted it (it's been a long, long day). Iechyd da Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 20:13, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- @Spica, haha, very funny. You know what I mean! @Susan, that's an upsilon, not an ypsilon! Also, how does "ɐ" read as "e"? Oh well.... the same thought occurred to me, but the damn anarchy image made my sig break at line endings... ħψɱɐ₦ 20:10, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- Huw: ta for that but HRC's own webstile spells her name with 2 Ls. Susan: big LOLz XD Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 20:06, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- (Human, why did you change your sig to hymen - is it a sign of something , I wonder? ContribsTalk 20:02, 24 May 2008 (EDT))
- The same thing that "DogP", if that is her real name, is talking about. ħψɱɐ₦ 19:58, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- Human: wot, exactly, are you talking about? Spica the Hiver If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 19:54, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
- That post was quite sexist, DogP. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 04:08, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
- Uhm...you have heard of irony, haven't you? You'll need plenty of it if you want to properly take the piss out of people. And, in fairness, I think most observers could spot that the person being ridiculed was her husband. Back to the books, Mr. Glow In the Dark Cracker! DogP 05:12, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
- Sorry, I missed the Lewinski reference. My bad : } Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:18, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
- Uhm...you have heard of irony, haven't you? You'll need plenty of it if you want to properly take the piss out of people. And, in fairness, I think most observers could spot that the person being ridiculed was her husband. Back to the books, Mr. Glow In the Dark Cracker! DogP 05:12, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
To answer the point I question I would recommend colorfast bleach. It will not only remove the stain but should do a good job of eliminating that pesky residual DNA at the same time.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 09:27, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
So[edit]
So... want to hook up sometime, I mean, have dinner? John McCain 02:27, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
- Hillary was so hot, back in the day... Hi John McInsane! ħψɱɐ₦ 03:49, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
- I take it you want to be my running mate Senator?--Hillary Rodham Clinton 09:28, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
HA! You LOST![edit]
It is with great pleasure that I read the newspaper this morning to find that Obama now has 2,128 delegates, and is therefore the nominee for the Democratic President. I will LIVE to rub that in! I bet the 42 people you killed after Whitewater are smiling in their graves! 64.72.65.130 10:08, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
- Don't be so harsh on her, Obama's been the nominee for a very long time. Al Gore 10:10, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
I have it![edit]
You're Anders. Barack Obama 15:10, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Sorry, but she isn't. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:14, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Sulk. Barack Obama 15:20, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Why this obsession with individual identities, anyway? Do as I do: Accept that identity is a fluid thing on the Internet and go with the flow. Think of it as a vast, grey mass of interchanging identities, any one of which could potentially be a sock of another, and simply enjoy the great choir of voices. [/poetic] --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:26, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- "Fluid identity" is a contradiction in terms. Sulk 15:29, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- No it isn't. The Mob o' Doom 15:33, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, it is. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:35, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- U SUCK! The Mob o' Doom 15:36, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- NO U! --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:37, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- U SUCK! The Mob o' Doom 15:36, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- ↳ ↑ <blink>⇨</blink> ↕ ▽ ← .si ti esruoc fO
- Yes, it is. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:35, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- No it isn't. The Mob o' Doom 15:33, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- "Fluid identity" is a contradiction in terms. Sulk 15:29, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Why this obsession with individual identities, anyway? Do as I do: Accept that identity is a fluid thing on the Internet and go with the flow. Think of it as a vast, grey mass of interchanging identities, any one of which could potentially be a sock of another, and simply enjoy the great choir of voices. [/poetic] --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:26, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Sulk. Barack Obama 15:20, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
I may have to give you all a good spanking.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 15:39, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- ↳
↑
<blink>⇨</blink>
↕
▽
←
.namuH yletanifeD
- You think so? Maybe they're just pretending to be Human. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:42, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- ↳
↑
<blink>⇨</blink>
↕
▽
←
?signehG ebyaM
- You may say as many names as you like. I AM HRC.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 15:47, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Wasting your time, Cha. Could be anyone. Just another voice in the choir. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:48, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Wrong, Amaranth. It couldn't be anyone -- it is definitely someone. Your circle-of-life spiel isn't winning you any converts. Sulk 15:49, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- For all we know, it could be no one - just the result of random electrons firing all over the Internet. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:51, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- How is "random electon firing with the semblance of identity" any different from "semi-autonomous organic matter with the semblance of identity"? Sulk 15:53, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Well, for one thing, electrons aren't exactly 'organic' by most definitions of either. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:55, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- The "organic" label is not important. It is still nothing but random motion. Sulk 15:57, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- This would be my cue to start talking about chaos theory if I knew anything about chaos theory. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:59, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- It's not chaos theory! Aaaaaaargh! --λινυσ(☮) 16:48, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Because you are the computer from Star Trek. As we've established. Sulk 16:00, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- You're confusing the past with the future again. Also, which computer would that be? There's been a couple along the way. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:02, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Perhaps you're the officer whose job it is to repeat what the computer says? Sulk 16:04, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Are you thinking of Spock? That would be fine with me. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:08, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Really? You would have to embrace SCIENCE. Renounce your heretical obsession with all that is not minutely quantifiable! At once! Sulk 16:10, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Contrary to common belief, Vulcan ethics are far from the crass materialism that you suggest here. As a follower of Kolinahr, I would assume Spock to accept fully the principle of Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations; a principle, I might add, from which many contemporary opinion-makers could learn a lot. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:14, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Really? You would have to embrace SCIENCE. Renounce your heretical obsession with all that is not minutely quantifiable! At once! Sulk 16:10, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Are you thinking of Spock? That would be fine with me. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:08, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Perhaps you're the officer whose job it is to repeat what the computer says? Sulk 16:04, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- You're confusing the past with the future again. Also, which computer would that be? There's been a couple along the way. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:02, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- This would be my cue to start talking about chaos theory if I knew anything about chaos theory. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:59, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- The "organic" label is not important. It is still nothing but random motion. Sulk 15:57, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Well, for one thing, electrons aren't exactly 'organic' by most definitions of either. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:55, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- How is "random electon firing with the semblance of identity" any different from "semi-autonomous organic matter with the semblance of identity"? Sulk 15:53, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- For all we know, it could be no one - just the result of random electrons firing all over the Internet. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:51, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Wrong, Amaranth. It couldn't be anyone -- it is definitely someone. Your circle-of-life spiel isn't winning you any converts. Sulk 15:49, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Wasting your time, Cha. Could be anyone. Just another voice in the choir. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:48, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- You may say as many names as you like. I AM HRC.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 15:47, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- ↳
↑
<blink>⇨</blink>
↕
▽
←
?signehG ebyaM
- You think so? Maybe they're just pretending to be Human. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:42, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Sulk 16:19, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- I wear that label with pride. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:29, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- I'm sure you do. (definitely no deceit here. No sir...) Sulk. 16:31, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- I wear that label with pride. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:29, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Sulk 16:19, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
The officer who had to repeat everything the computer said was Sigourney Weaver in "Out of Orbit.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 16:34, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Is that a movie? Never heard of it. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:38, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- I think she means Galaxyquest. And incidentally Anders, I'd check this edit if I were you. Godspleen. Sulk. 16:41, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, what Sulk said.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 16:44, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- My name is CHAOS! Sulk. 16:45, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Really? I thought it was Barack Obama. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:47, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- I don't know why you'd think that. Barack Obama 16:50, 15 July 2008
- No, of course. My bad. >_> --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:52, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- I'm going to stop posting as Sulk, now. I'm professing renewed commitment to talking backwards. !soidA Sulk. 16:54, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Keep up the good work. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 17:04, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- ↳
↑
<blink>⇨</blink>
↕
▽
←
.leehw I .sknaT
- I could hypothetically write it, sign it, scan it, and then upload it for the world to marvel at... but that still seems like a lot of trouble to go to. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 17:16, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- ↳ ↑ <blink>⇨</blink> ↕ ▽ ← !ysoahc os eb d'tI !no og ,hO
- I could hypothetically write it, sign it, scan it, and then upload it for the world to marvel at... but that still seems like a lot of trouble to go to. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 17:16, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- ↳
↑
<blink>⇨</blink>
↕
▽
←
.leehw I .sknaT
- Keep up the good work. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 17:04, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- I'm going to stop posting as Sulk, now. I'm professing renewed commitment to talking backwards. !soidA Sulk. 16:54, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- No, of course. My bad. >_> --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:52, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- I don't know why you'd think that. Barack Obama 16:50, 15 July 2008
- Really? I thought it was Barack Obama. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 16:47, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- My name is CHAOS! Sulk. 16:45, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, what Sulk said.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 16:44, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
- I think she means Galaxyquest. And incidentally Anders, I'd check this edit if I were you. Godspleen. Sulk. 16:41, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
The future[edit]
Do a good job as SoS, and you'll get Biden's slot in 2012, setting you up for your own run for the top in 2016! ħuman 15:31, 28 January 2009 (EST)
- Yeah, but by that point everything will have fallen apart and the Republicans will have a clear run. Time evil Hoover! 15:33, 28 January 2009 (EST)
- I think not, and I have high hopes to follow up Mr Obama.--Hillary Rodham Clinton 12:30, 2 February 2009 (EST)
Demotion[edit]
Mrs Clinton, you are hereby endowed with sysop powers at RationalWiki. Please use them wisely and compassionately. Thank you. ЩєазєюіδMethinks it is a Weasel 15:05, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- That's a surprise. I wonder if I will need to declare this as a gift?--Hillary Rodham Clinton 16:10, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- Enjoy your Swearing-In ceremony. After you've had blinis and champagne and done the document signing business, you can come back here for your Swearing-At ceremony. DogP 16:13, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- How many times do we do the swearing-in?--Hillary Rodham Clinton 16:20, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- Once for the cameras and once for Allah...pretty standard. Neveruse513 16:22, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- OK, Standard stuff there then. Any secret oaths? Handshakes?--Hillary Rodham Clinton 17:19, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- Once for the cameras and once for Allah...pretty standard. Neveruse513 16:22, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- How many times do we do the swearing-in?--Hillary Rodham Clinton 16:20, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- Enjoy your Swearing-In ceremony. After you've had blinis and champagne and done the document signing business, you can come back here for your Swearing-At ceremony. DogP 16:13, 2 February 2009 (EST)
Heh[edit]
Have you ever told Bill how little he knows about embryology? --Earthland (talk) 15:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- We usually stay off the subject of reproduction.--Hillary Rodham Clinton (talk) 15:51, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know much about you, but do you have children? Btw, hos did you like Tallinn? --Earthland (talk) 16:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- I assume you continue pretending to be Hillary Clinton? It's no fun if you won't. --Earthland (talk) 16:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- What do you mean "pretending"?--Hillary Rodham Clinton (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oh good, good. Do you also stay off the subject of Monica? --Earthland (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Are you deliberately trying to be hurtful and offensive? I think you may need a lesson in tact young man.--Hillary Rodham Clinton (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've always thought that the whole scandal was meant to cover up that it was actually you who had a sexual relationship with that woman. --Earthland (talk) 17:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- That's a very lame conspiracy theory. And also a little hurtful. I believe that I shall go back to promoting world peace.--Hillary Rodham Clinton (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've always thought that the whole scandal was meant to cover up that it was actually you who had a sexual relationship with that woman. --Earthland (talk) 17:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Are you deliberately trying to be hurtful and offensive? I think you may need a lesson in tact young man.--Hillary Rodham Clinton (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oh good, good. Do you also stay off the subject of Monica? --Earthland (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- What do you mean "pretending"?--Hillary Rodham Clinton (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC)