There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Meh.
Indeed. P-Foster (talk) 17:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Could you try a little harder to be an unproductive prick? I don't think you've managed to communicate just how little you care. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 19:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- How else do you effectively communicate precisely how small a fuck you actually give?
d hominem 19:55, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Meh. (talk) 19:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Why unwelcome? I like his/her brilliantly eloquent style. --Idiot numbre 188 (talk) 20:11, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
- Meh. (talk) 19:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
You're a joke that was old before you even started "telling" it. And then you told it multiple times. Blue (pester) 22:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
I am bored[edit]
I think you are a sock of him. ТиранесAn pocket-sized, yet defenestrate Nintendo 64? 17:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Blah[edit]
Hmmmm. Lord Goonie Hooray! I'm helping! 22:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
You're a sysop[edit]
Who gives a fuck?. P-Foster (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2011 (UTC)