User talk:PolarBearInTheJungle/Archive9

;;

TOP IS VERY USEFUL. -- =w= 01:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

**blush** TheoryOfPractice 01:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

ToP = Theory of Paul. -- =w= 01:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Discovered! Was that you rooting through my trash the other day? TheoryOfPractice 01:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes but I can explain. I was just looking for heroin. You see it was perfectly innocent. -- =w= 01:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

really?

i am banned from future bureaucrat list for that question :-(?Waronstupidity (talk) 02:54, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes. And you may be banned from the site for pestering me about it on my talk page. I suggest you submit a writing plan and justify your continued presence here. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 03:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

WTF? what the hell did i do to deserve your attitude.............. look at my contribution and tell me i haven't contributed here.

i just asked a goddamn question and you want to ban me ? damn that as stupid as conservapedia banning people for posting liberal comment on the talk page........

i seriously hope you are joking. but if you are serious then know this, i dont accept to be threatened for no reason.

if you want to ban me go ahead,ban me for asking a question while you let TK acount stay here unbanned while HE did put bad stuff.Waronstupidity (talk) 03:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

ToP was making a CP-centric joke. Also, yeah, I agree with him mostly. Your war on stupidity is mostly stupid. ħuman 03:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

what war on stupidity? that my nickname that all it is.

why are you guy so angry at me all of a sudden ?Waronstupidity (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

He's not angry I don't think, he's pretending to be someone from Conservapedia. --Sean^talk 03:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

No. I am angry. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

then ban me loser if that you want but know that i did nothing to you.Waronstupidity (talk) 03:53, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm not angry at you. I'm just angry. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 03:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

You mad?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFgXF0a_Yw4&feature=related Just FYI, being the Cam'ron to your Bill O'Riley is something I find very funny.UncleHo (talk) 22:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

YOUR ALSO ONE OF THEM TOO!!!

Totally so ''Link title''SAD AND BOOOOOORING!!!!!!--Radioactive PIzza (talk) 22:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)--Radioactive PIzza (talk) 22:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)--Radioactive PIzza (talk) 22:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

allor comment ca va pour toi au *state* ?

t'enui tu de note tite poutine?Waronstupidity (talk) 22:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

So, this guy just threatened me, are you going to do anything, or does your internet rage only apply to Listener, Theory?UncleHo (talk) 23:25, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

It applies to people who've been here a while, made constructive edits, shown they know how to roll with the punches, occasionally make us laugh, and who don't come across as self-righteous little pocket revolutionaries who show no desire whatsoever to learn and read and expand their intellectual horizons--which is exactly how you described yourself in our conversation about genocide. So, no. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I know how to roll with the punches. Punch back. As you've evidenced quite well, a nice counter is far more effective than a slip or bob. Also, I've made a lot of constructive edits, unless you define that by "HURF LEFTISTS ARE POOPOOHEADS" or "RARRRGHHH ODIN"UncleHo (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

tes pas un leftist, tes juste un criss de trou du cul qui vien foutre la merde.Waronstupidity (talk) 23:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Bot

Why would I abuse it? I'm not a teenager looking for brief lulz. Best regards. C6541 (talk) 00:51, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Just joshin' with you...TheoryOfPractice (talk) 02:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

The insurgency edits are great. Thank you so much. Researcher (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Priest pederasty comment on Rob's talk page

Absolutely brilliant. Well played. Corry (talk) 02:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 03:00, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Moosik

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFoIdxLBm_A

ħuman 07:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Fart

FAAAAAAART.

Ah, sorry, I farted. This page has been gas attacked by SuperJosh. Sorry.

What's the copyright staus of File:Awesome.jpg?

No hard feelings.
Check out the new file here
:-D
Civic Cat (talk) 22:36, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

w

The awesome return of PFoster! This is the first step in the road of reforming the Classic RW Lineup. Mei (talk) 06:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Revert

Actually, the BoN's edit looked fine. Though I'm not sure why the BoN put such an odd edit comment... Tetronian ^{you're clueless} 13:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Entirely my bad. I assumed bad faith and didn't even read the edit. P-Foster (talk) 14:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

No harm done. Tetronian ^{you're clueless} 14:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

J'ecrie juste trop vite

pourquoi ta enlever la section quebec?

c'est la verite... faut tu que je te link sur le site officiel du parti ? http://www.ndp.ca/ Waronstupidity (talk) 21:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Je l'ai enlevé par-ce-qu j'ai lu ca trois fois et j n'ai aucune idée de quoi ca veut dire. P-Foster (talk) 21:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

je lai remi avec une meilleur explication.Waronstupidity (talk) 21:39, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

est tu la ?Waronstupidity (talk) 21:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

merci pour m'aider a upgrader mes articles.

mais je conprend pas pourquoi ta deleter un section complete sur mon article sur jean marie le pen ?Waronstupidity (talk) 00:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Because it's unintelligibly written for starters, and because trying to say that Republicans = Pat Robertson = LePen is lacking in subtlety of analysis...P-Foster (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

damn you sound angry.... its not unintelligibly written that quite insulting, i may have a couple of spelling error but dont call it *unintelligible*Waronstupidity (talk) 00:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

I was just about to give Rob a kick in the ass block myself. Aside from the WP harassment, I'm considering "You want to litigate all this before Arbcom?" to be a veiled threat, and I'm not a big fan of folks threatening the users here. Besides, Sid's already made it clear he wants none of it. --Kels (talk) 04:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I am totally not following that situation--I barely even edit WP, but I can't see the good in allowing him to drag his agenda onto our goofy little wiki--especially considering that none of us can post on his. eff him. Next time it goes up to 96 hour, and it doubles again each time after that. P-Foster (talk) 13:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Support He's not worth wasting a lot of time on, honestly. All he wants to do is wikilawyer, he can do that over at WP. I'm betting he won't, though. It's all about harassment, and they've got a lower tolerance for it than we have. --Kels (talk) 14:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. He keeps bitching on about ArbCom; maybe that's because he has had experience of dealing with them in the past. alt (talk) 14:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I wonder how Arbcom would feel about him frequently insulting their intelligence, and suggesting they haven't the attention span to read Sid's evidence. Oh, and I love this. He seems to think Sid making one edit which the other guy accepted as valid and took things to talk without making a single edit to mainspace after that is "edit warring". I'd love so see him convince the Arbcom guys of that one. --Kels (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

fuckery

sorry, meant to delete the death one. See my edit comment, plus, if an afterlife was scientifically disproved, we'd have heard about it. Tweety (talk) 16:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

p.s., its because I'm editing on a mobile phone Tweety (talk) 16:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

EC) DON'T DELETE WIGOs whatever the reason. It can fuck up the numbering. The WIGo is reporting the report, not agreeing or condemning it. ^yummy &  ^honey_{(or marmalade)} 16:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

EC. Fine. vote it down and move along. Not to delete. Fucks with the voting system, deprives others of the chance to vote down lameness. P-Foster (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

You also may need to read Negative proof Tweety.--Bob^{Spring is sprung!} 16:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I apologise, I didn't realise it would screw shit up Tweety (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Tweety

I've half a mind to promote him to editor to cause an Admin abuse question. ^yummy &  ^honey_{(or marmalade)} 19:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Much appreciated Tweety (talk) 19:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

You would get little grief from me, my buttery friend. P-Foster (talk) 19:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

for unblocking tk or being generally l33t? Tweety (talk) 19:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

For generally being a pillock. (and definitely not 133t) ^yummy &  ^honey_{(or marmalade)} 19:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

i prefer p1ll0ck Tweety (talk) 19:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

salut!

Comment ca va pour toi?Waronstupidity (talk) 04:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

PFoster stole my revert and now I'm leaving this message to him

I was ambivalent about reverting him until I got to 'until it was corrupted by christianity'. Lose 10 points and return to starting square. Mei (talk) 04:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Also I like PFoster. Mei (talk) 04:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

eh blocks RobSmith and doesn't afraid of anything. P-Foster (talk) 04:14, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I like how you also vandal binned him. I imagine you saying 'Hmmmm........ Yeah, that oughtta do it.' Mei (talk) 04:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Some people might argue we don't really do that kind of stuff around here

I thought you were one of them. -- Nx / talk 21:28, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I could say I'm not, I could say Never and I have a history of this kind of sniping and I'll undo it in a minute or two, I could say somebody'll revert it before he even notices, or I could say "fuck him." Take your pick. P-Foster (talk) 21:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

liberal evangelicals

They too practice the dark arts of spiritual terrorism. It is firmly established that liberal evangelicals have a better understanding of voodoo than most professional voodooists. You will lose credibility if you deny this. Mei (talk) 04:44, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Fucking Orphaned Pages

You shouldn't do that. It's wrong. Mei (talk) 22:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Consenting adults. P-Foster (talk) 22:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that sounds like something done by wikiperverts in the corners of dark alleys... --The Emperor _{Kneel before Zod!} 22:58, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Well, someone's got to do it. We've had a bit of an article creation drive in recent weeks but the linking back has been a little lacklustre. ^{d hominem} 23:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Done, for the most part. Later Imma do the dead ends page. P-Foster (talk) 23:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

I think I already did that page. Mei (talk) 23:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Skype

Call skype......now. Call Crundy1. Aceⁱ⁹ 01:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm there....P-Foster (talk) 01:47, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

nice nice....Aceⁱ⁹ 01:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

meh

Only changed it to make it shorter and more concise for easy reading. rational ghey (send a message) 02:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Plagiarism

It's not plagiarism if she wrote the original -- Nx / talk 13:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't know that's her...P-Foster (talk) 13:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Yep, count down to inexplicable tantrum in 5,4,3,... - π 13:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

"Posted by Teresita at 8:03 PM" Aw, Jeeezus, it's her again. P-Foster (talk) 13:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

(ec) The username kind of gives it away. -- Nx / talk 13:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I rolled them back. P-Foster (talk) 13:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Loya Jirga roll call

Totnesmartin plans to retire from the Loya Jirga, so we're holding a by-election to determine his replacement. We need to know if anyone else has left the LJ, so could you stop by and give a holler? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

hay

how you doin'? rational ghey (send a message) 23:59, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Double standards

So, you gonna answer? Why is it alright to bash religion as long as it's not Judaism?

'Cuz we are in cahoots with the vast Zionist conspiracy that rules the world, that's why! And sign your damn talkpage posts!!! Gooniepunk2010 ^{Oi! Oi! Oi!} 05:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Answered on the relevant talkpage, ya pantywaist. P-Foster (talk) 05:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Combat 18

If it is true...? Aceⁱ⁹ 07:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Sure--but the Asatururru thing is about Ho's hate-on for LX, he as much as said so in an edit comment. But I'm drunk and angry about something else right now so should prolly step back. P-Foster (talk) 07:10, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

We are all drunk and angry. Aceⁱ⁹ 07:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Combat 18 were famous and active enough to rate a mention. The Asatru claim is [citation needed] - David Gerard (talk) 08:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

A red-red little logo, a browny-red big logo and a blue banner?

Indeed. It started as a consistent, fairly dominating red-red. People wanted a darker and more desaturated red to be "easier on the eye" so the header was desaturated down and darkened. I tried to recolour the logo to match, but for some reason it didn't recolour to the exact thing and it mis-matched - so we had two redish/brownish, generally turd coloured elements, but hey, at least it wasn't garish. Redoing the smaller icons is, of course, more difficult as they're on one image, must be aligned perfectly to work and so they were kind of left until the final thing could be done. Hence they've stayed the original shading (well, the active ones are actually a notch brighter because of the soft-light glow). Then the header changed blue, which has been on the cards for a few days and I kind of like anyway. It'll sort itself out, it always does... ^{d hominem} 13:25, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Great idea...

Totally winsome! ^{d hominem} 16:36, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Your talk page is not your property

Do not remove comments from your talk page, it is against the rules. -- Nx / talk 16:44, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

So are threats, as was the edit I removed. P-Foster (talk) 16:45, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

The CS quite clearly says: "users should not delete or change another user's comments on a talk or discussion page." Please stop reverting. -- Nx / talk 16:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Hey there

Quit editing under the line that says "LJ only below this line" please. Your input is very welcome, but that is our special place to call each other cunts and bitches. Use da talk page, please. ħuman 07:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

But P-Foster = TOP. Perhaps we should change the LJ name list.--Bob^{Spring is sprung!} 07:33, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

EC Ummm, I'm ON THE FUCKING LOYA JIRGA...Hugs and kisses, P-Foster (talk) 07:35, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Haha who knew confusion could be so hilarious. Aceⁱ⁹ 07:38, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh fuck me, seriously? Shit. I'm sorry. ħuman 08:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

If you've been here since 1997, why is your user name ambiguous? Or was that a joke? ħuman 08:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I am gonna some sense into you

As suggested, someone needs talk sense into you and I am the one to do it. Have more sex. Aceⁱ⁹ 23:09, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

What the Fuck, Ace? all of a sudden i'm the only guy around here who vandal bins IPs? Unless you've posted the same message at Crundy's, Gerard's, Concerned Resident's, Junggai's, Goonie's and your own talk page--all people who've done the same in the last couple days, kindly go fuck yourself in the ass. Thanks. P-Foster (talk) 23:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Jesus fuck you mutant. The sense I am talking into you is to have more sex. I dont give a fuck about vandal binning. Christ almighty you know me better than that. Aceⁱ⁹ 23:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Foster, do think about your present course very carefully. I think once you understand the fundamental logical problem - IE, vandal binning doesn't affect me but hurts innocents - you'll understand that what you are currently doing is extremely petty and counter productive. 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

EC--Sorry, ACE--tensions are running high. I would have more sex, but Huw's sister won't return my fuckin' calls after that whole episode with the Rottweiller and the Cuban dwarf photographer. How the fuck was I supposed to know she was allergic to dogs in the first place? P-Foster (talk) 23:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

You do know she's welsh right? Aceⁱ⁹ 23:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Actually, no, she's American. Conceived and born here stateside. ħuman 23:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Is she pretty? Aceⁱ⁹ 23:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

joke FAIL 86.40.107.167 (talk) 23:29, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

In the worlds of Tom Lehrer "don't solicit for your sister, that's not nice. Unless you get a good percentage of of her price!" ^{d hominem} 23:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Right on

While I normally think we should let people put whateverthefuck they want on their userpage, I somehow find myself agreeing with you over this revision to Research Psychologist's userpage. Lord Goonie ^{Hooray! I'm helping!} 15:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Glad to have your support, Goonie. Using our online community as a platform for antagonizing and threatening a bunch of nazis =/= a great idea. P-Foster (talk) 16:43, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I do find it suspicious that the edit would come from you of all people: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/PFoster Research psychologist (talk) 21:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

yawn. P-Foster (talk) 22:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Right on nigga! Fuck the nazi's. Aceⁱ⁹ 22:07, 26 June 2010 (UTC)