|
Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Santahoho.
This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. Response:Read my comment and the evidence I gave about Musk being Trump in disguise. And think critically and you'll realize the evidence. The "nature of my edits" is that I found proof which I provided evidence for.
We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives.
Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you.
If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.
|
--Goatspeed. How's my editingCircularR
asoningMy experiments 06:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Seriously. Some anon IP rudely reverted my edits and I get banned from the Saloon Bar. Isn't this Rationalwiki? I gave rational proof that Musk and Trump are the same person and I get rudely reverted. What's with you? Don't you think rationally here? — Unsigned, by: Santahoho / talk / contribs
- "But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink!--Edict123456789 (talk) 10:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- You were in the wrong, there's an exception to the "no editing/removing comments" rule, if they're obviously bad-faith. (And besides, "But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink!) Indeed, how can a site that calls itself "rational" not see this obvious truth THEY don't want you to know? --Goatspeed. How's my editingCircularRasoningMy experiments 11:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- For fuck's sake, please, this is not difficult! Sign your posts with (~~~~) or (if that's too fucking hard) by clicking on the fucking sign BUTTON:
on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) This keeps the place tidy and stops you looking like a complete arsing tool so please, just fucking do it already.
- And it seems rather suspicious that, despite pretty much all North American editors currently being asleep (so most of our regulars), and during the holiday season, all of these edit wars between you and this one IP to only your comments always seem to happen within mere minutes of each other. For all I know you could be playing both sides to try and stir up silly drama. Regardless, I have decided to block that IP address. --Goatspeed. How's my editingCircularRasoningMy experiments 11:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 This almost made CR pee himself laughing 🤣🤣🤣
|
- Thanks for blocking that IP I mistook for you. And I will put here the comment that got reverted: Not only does Musk behave similarly but 1) He reinstated Trump on Twitter after buying it. 2) No person is likely to want someone disruptive like Trump back on their platform. 3) Him looking different can easily be explained because he is wearing a mask, wig, and other disguises. 4) Then we have Trump already having used a fake identity of John Baron years ago. Conclusion) To sum, all evidence points that Musk is another of his thinly disguised alter egos. Consider the evidence and it becomes obvious. Santahoho (talk) 14:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- That’s a good one! You can’t be serious. You must be trolling. 🤣 I really don’t see the likeness (at least physically), per Occam's Razor the more likely explanation is that Musk is an edgelord grifter, and is trying to get clout and maybe a quick buck off the perpetual, manufactured rage of the most terminally-online country’s most gullible political demographic towards everything that isn’t them. And that, my friend is why I removed access to the Elon Musk article. Try to insert this crap into it again, and I’ll block you again for pi days. After that, pi weeks. And I’m being nice by only keeping you from editing two pages, most editors who act like you were acting have gotten sitewide blocks for similar behavior on here, even after the update that added partial blocks. --Goatspeed. How's my editingCircularRasoningMy experiments
- A guy who is a billionaire and into Mars technology can afford to cleverly disgusting his body and face in a way to maintain a double life. Also, he behaves so similarly (embracing conspiracy theories, making outrageous remarks, retweeting hateful tweets, etc.) that it becomes obvious he is the same man. — Unsigned, by: Santahoho / talk / contribs
- …What the actual heck? If I still had my mop, I'd be extending your block on the basis of you clearly not learning anything from this and acting in bad faith. Read our articles on conspiracy theory and cognitive dissonance and then get back to us with how ridiculous you sound. --Luigifan18 (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- —cosmikdebris talk stalk 15:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- I already binned the idiot, but if you all wanna ban them that's fine with me. I have to ask what's the purpose of having a vandal bin if we're just gonna ban all trolls anyway though. Carthage (talk) 16:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- If they're just a single-purpose troll with an obsession with only a few really specific pages I usually just use the recently-added partial block feature we used to finally rid the Saloon Bar of Machina's solipsism fluff like I did to stop the SB spam and Elon Musk wandalism, but I can't control what cosmik does. --Goatspeed. How's my editingCircularRasoningMy experiments 16:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Vandal bins normally stop trolls due to increasing the effort involved, but this troll (and/or insane person) was pretty persistent. BobJohnson (talk) 16:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was legitimately surprised when they continued to edit-war with themselves and say "i ThOuGhT tHiS wAs RATIONALWiKi1111!!!oneoneelventy11one!!111one!!!11!!". But nonetheless, the trollpost did end up quite amusing, usually when I partial-block some single-purpose troll they immediately give up --Goatspeed. How's my editingCircularRasoningMy experiments 17:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
|
