User talk:TheAmazingSkeptic

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, TheAmazingSkeptic!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

<-𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈-> (talk) 23:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. How pleasant of a person you must be. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


Appreciated. Hipocritehasaphone (talk) 00:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Ha, love it. Not very wise though. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 01:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."[edit]

Sadly, the scientific method disagrees. :/ (talk) 23:08, 10 December 42015 AQD (UTC)

I don't know what you boys are arguing about, but at the core of things, one always starts with observation - not hypothesis. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


Why do you demote somebody after a grand total of two edits? Autopatrolled status is usually given after at least a few days, during which the editor in question has shown themselves not to be completely insane. I'm not saying that TheArrogantSkeptic is insane, but I'd recommend waiting a bit until they've shown themselves to be at least somewhat competent. --JorisEnter (talk) 23:13, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet. The Captcha is annoying. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Q: Why have sockpuppet? Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk) 23:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
A: So "they" can't find him, I guess. "They" being well know to us. --JorisEnter (talk) 23:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppets are not banned as I understand, only using them to add votes. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
So effectively, you're just manipulating votes. Totally not cheaty or anything. --JorisEnter (talk) 23:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I don't quite understand? Are you saying I've manipulated votes? .-. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
What then did you mean by "Only using them to add votes"? --JorisEnter (talk) 23:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
If someone used a main account as well as sockpuppets to vote, that would be a violation. Just having them is not a problem, at least it never used to be. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Then why the heck do you use them? If they are only for voting (do you have even more sockpuppets?), why not simply use your main account for that? --JorisEnter (talk) 23:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I have them because they amuse me. Sometimes I use them to vote, but when I do I only use one. Using more than one account to vote for the same thing is a violation. Again, this is how I understand it something might've changed. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:37, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

IDK about voting and I don't want to ban you. Asking why you made it. ;P αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 00:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

I did not think you wanted to ban me, I was talking to Joris mostly. I simply have them because I like them, I have several. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

I love you[edit]

A lot. Jaboc Solve (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quick question[edit]

H3h3 stabilized.gif Triggered much? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Very angry that my Hammer & Sickle shirt has still not arrived in the mail. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 21:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
If only you could seize the memes of production! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


I have taken away your mop. Edits such as this and this one aren't exactly appreciated.--JorisEnter (talk) 11:42, 25 November 2016 (UTC)