There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Wooden Box
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
--Gale5050 (talk) 20:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
You act a lot like a banned user here. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 20:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- The timing (immediately after the Smith afd) is also weird. Christopher (talk) 20:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- If they're crap articles of no relevance (exactly what they are), delete them. The blocking of accounts when an account is trying to clean up the wiki is ridiculous.Adramyttium (talk) 20:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- And why did you just sign up to comment on this, right after Wooden Box was binned? If they're trying to clean up the wiki, why choose HBD of all things? Why do an afd rather than make a comment on the talk page? --It's-a me,
LeftyGreenMario! 20:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sure there's some non-HBD stuff needing to be removed as well but those AfD's were created because the websites have been deleted or are totally non-notable - I thought they would be easily deleted. Please vote to delete providing a valid reason rather than speculating who has created AfDs.Adramyttium (talk) 20:58, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- You’re defending Smith the same way the last account to afd a bunch of articles on racists did. You’re obviously the same guy, either a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of Smith, either way you’re not welcome here. All you’re doing is making it harder for legitimate users to AfD these pages as they have to go to the trouble of moving the old AfD and changing a bunch of links. Christopher (talk) 21:03, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- They don't AfD the pages though. Some of these articles have been up for 7 or 8 years with no AfD. Adramyttium (talk)
- You’re defending Smith the same way the last account to afd a bunch of articles on racists did. You’re obviously the same guy, either a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of Smith, either way you’re not welcome here. All you’re doing is making it harder for legitimate users to AfD these pages as they have to go to the trouble of moving the old AfD and changing a bunch of links. Christopher (talk) 21:03, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sure there's some non-HBD stuff needing to be removed as well but those AfD's were created because the websites have been deleted or are totally non-notable - I thought they would be easily deleted. Please vote to delete providing a valid reason rather than speculating who has created AfDs.Adramyttium (talk) 20:58, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- And why did you just sign up to comment on this, right after Wooden Box was binned? If they're trying to clean up the wiki, why choose HBD of all things? Why do an afd rather than make a comment on the talk page? --It's-a me,
- If they're crap articles of no relevance (exactly what they are), delete them. The blocking of accounts when an account is trying to clean up the wiki is ridiculous.Adramyttium (talk) 20:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)