Democratic Party

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
The previous logo (a bloody ass donkey)
Guide to:

U.S. Politics

Icon politics USA.svg
Hail to the Chief?
Persons of interest


It is quite certain that a moderate Republican will be nominated to stand as his party's candidate for the presidency. His name is Barack Obama.
—Some damn Canucks[1]
Remember back when Democrats used to vote with us?
—Leo McGarry, The West Wing

The Democrat Party Democratic Party is a centre-left political party in the United States, widely perceived to be left-wing in the American political spectrum. That's the great irony of the modern GOP: as it moves further right, it has become less conservative in the Dictionary definition/non-partisan sense. It's a real question now whether the GOP or the Democrats are the more conservative party.

Contents

[edit] A short history

The electoral college from the 1860 presidential election, only months before the American Civil War. Compare to today.

The successor to the Democratic-Republican Party, the Democrats historically acted as the more populist party, as opposed to the mercantilist Whigs and (later )the industrial Republicans. At the same time, however, it was rooted in many socially and economically conservative views, notably being anti-Second Bank (Andrew Jackson), anti-tariff (ie. the Bourbons) and supporting and upholding slavery (later segregation).

The party began to move to the left in two major shifts,:starting with Woodrow Wilson in the 1910s and Franklin D. Roosevelt during the Great Depression. The latter was buffered by the "New Deal Coalition," a combination of urban constituents, immigrants, intellectuals, organized labour, farmers, whites from the Solid South and (for the first time) African Americans, all of whom agreed on more government intervention in the economy but not much else.[2]

The schism widened in the 1960s, the hot-button issues being the Vietnam War and desegregation. Nixon took advantage of this with his "Southern strategy," which flipped the American political sphere on its backside: almost every southern seat defected to the GOP. The remaining liberal Republicans (or the "Ike Republicans," vital in passing the Civil Rights Act) fled to the Democrats.

Unable to keep the fire alive into the 80's, the DNC embraced the snail's pace of incrementalism. The McGovern-Fraser pivot (1968) towards the primary system ushered in the age of Third Way politics. Couple it with the presence of superdelegates and the reliance of more primaries, and the result was less populism and more appeal to urban areas.

[edit] Future

Ironically, by winning the culture war the Democrats have ceded the electoral war: hard-up whites behaved like a minority bloc and came out for Trump in the same way that African-Americans did for Obama. The strength of the Dems used to be that they had broad ideological flexibility. They are the party of non-whites, which is a huge and diverse group. Now that diversity hurts their messaging in presidential elections, and as America's power twilights and those folks see their lifestyle changing dramatically, social conservatism will only get stronger. It makes perfect sense for the GOP to cultivate that base rather than try and shove them into the cellar as they have been doing. That approach is what made Romney lose. Playing to the alt-right is what made Trump win. The dynamics are different in Canada, the UK, et. al, but it's playing out in other countries, too.

On a more superficial level, with stuff like DNC hacks, the party is forced to remain squeaky clean. The RNC does not have this problem. Trump and his subordinates know this and will couple it with swiftboating/voter suppression tactics. Over 30 states have Republican majorities in both chambers (which equals more gerrymandering, since the governors approve the redistricting bills), and they are just one or two states away from a constitutional majority, when they can change the constitution to enshrine their extremism into law.[3]

[edit] Internal factions

While the Democrats have a substantial liberal wing among the public at large, the party's inability to coordinate itself properly results in a political platform that consists of rolling over to Republican schemes and failing to provide effective leadership. The sectarian violence appears below.

[edit] Progressive Democrats

European-styled social democrats, some bordering on socialist. In the House they are organized in the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), the largest of its kind in the House of Representatives. Some are descendants of the New Left:

  • Cecil Bothwell
  • Sherrod Brown
  • Donna Edwards
  • Keith Ellison
  • Russ Feingold (the only Senator to vote against the original manifestation of the PATRIOT Act)
  • Barney Frank
  • Alan Grayson
  • Kamala Harris
  • Dennis Kucinich
  • Barbara Lee
  • John Lewis
  • Jim McDermott
  • Cynthia McKinney (switched to Greens to the Democrats' relief, "An long time ago")
  • Jamie Raskin
  • Bernie Sanders (self-described and indeed admitted "Democratic" socialist; for many years he wasn't even an actual Democrat, but caucused with them. He switched his party registration from Independent to Democratic in time for his 2016 presidential bid)
  • Pete Stark (the first openly atheist member of Congress[4])
  • Elizabeth Warren

[edit] Traditional liberals

Constitute half of the voter base, and take pain to avoid infighting between the separate Democratic coalitions. "A little left of center," in FDR's words, and don't share many differences with the progressives anyway:

[edit] New Democrats

The Third Way moderates. Birth from the Democratic Leadership Council in the 80s, they turned the party increasingly neoliberal in the 90s, and are roughly equivalent to the British New Labour. Represented by the New Democrat Coalition (an affiliate of the now-defunct Democratic Leadership Council):

  • Bill Clinton, who led the New Democrat coalition. Clinton took a bipartisan track with regards to NAFTA (conservative) and Hillarycare (progressive), but had mixed results in doing so.
  • Hillary Clinton, who heads the Clinton Foundation and leads the centrist Democrats who dominate much of the DNC to this day.
  • Andrew Cuomo
  • John Edwards
  • Dianne Feinstein
  • Al Gore
  • Martin O'Malley
  • Joe Lieberman (independent since 2006)
  • Harry Reid
  • Barack Obama[5]
  • Chuck Schumer
  • Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the incompetent head of the DNC who often votes with Republicans.

[edit] Blue Dogs

The Blue Dog Coalition are often accused of being DINOs, most commonly on social issues and deficit hawkery.[6] These guys are the same concern-trolling fucks that FDR crushed on his way to enacting the New Deal. Officially they are a coalition in the House but a few ideologically aligned Senators are listed as well. They're typically elected in Jesusland, and are considered flaming lefties there, despite being firmly centre-right:

[edit] Dixiecrat leftovers and boll weevils

To the right of the Blue Dogs. Not a significant feature in the party anymore, although occasionally one will turn up here and there as a failed Senate candidate,Wikipedia's W.svg or a centrist Democrat will go haywire and swing far to the right.[7]

  • Virgil Goode (left the Democrats in 2000, was the Constitution Party presidential nominee in 2012)
  • Zell Miller[8]

[edit] These guys

These often vote with the progressive and traditional liberal wings of the party, but have their conservative quirky bits. Not easily categorized elsewhere:

  • Lincoln Chafee (Who self-describing as Libertarian-leading Progressive for some reason?, Thus maybe means to be down as others "Libertarians" technically?)
  • Jon Tester
  • Jim Webb

[edit] The libertarians

Yes, they exist too, probably upset about Dubya's stance on civil liberties and the Republicans' constant juggling between pro-business interests and the Religious Right:

  • Mike Gravel
  • There is also an erstwhile "Democratic Freedom Caucus" influenced by Georgism whose actual influence in the party is negligible

[edit] So who's ticking them on their ballot?

All over the country Democrats are running on their singular strength – the fact that they are not as batshit crazy as their Republican opponents.
Chris Ladd[9]

Today, the Democratic Party attracts academia, white-collar professionals,[10] scientists,[11] medical students,[12] the youth vote,[13] the working class,[14] increasingly the middle class,[15] consumer advocates, copyright reformers, women,[16] LGBT, and ethnic minorities. However, many progressives feel left out of the Party, especially those whose focus in on income inequality. These are alarmed by positions taken by, e.g., Jon Cowan, president of the centrist think tank Third Way, claims populism is dead in the Party, who argues:

“There is a very large faction within the Democratic Party that wants to go back in time,” Cowan told me. “They want to take what we did in the 20th century and do more of it. They want to re-unionize the entire country, unwind the trade deals of the last couple of decades, and not just preserve but expand entitlements. Even if we could afford that, it wouldn’t solve most of the problems of the middle class.”

That is, many top dog Democrats don't want to deal with income inequality; they want to appeal to the middle-class voters who have been moving in the Democratic direction.

Self-identified Democratic centrist and two-term Delaware governor, Jack Markell, agrees that the middle class is key, and claims: : '“If it’s about inequality, it’s a conversation that has the potential of dividing us.” ...Markell says that middle-class voters hear in the crusade against “inequality” a desire to equalize people rather than make everyone better off."[17] In all this, progressives hear no Party support for unionizing the working poor in the service sector, or for supporting any new programs to assist with the cost of child care or sky-rocketing college tuition.

[edit] Quotes

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] References

  1. Hey, we didn't say it.
  2. Franklin Delano Roosevelt: The American Franchise, University of Virginia
  3. http://www.cbpp.org/research/states-likely-could-not-control-constitutional-convention-on-balanced-budget-amendment-or
  4. "Representative Pete Stark Named 2008 Humanist of the Year"
  5. Obama's inclusion here is striking in that while his election effectively shut down the DLC, his outlook as POTUS has been largely Clintonian.
  6. A Brief History of Blue Dog Democrats, Time
  7. In states that are effectively one-party blue states, it's not uncommon to find wingnut Democrats who are only Democrats because they can't get elected otherwise. They're almost the same as Dixiecrats.
  8. aka. The Duel Guy. Watch Zell Miller vs. Chris Matthews
  9. What Kansas says about our political future, Houston Chronicle (The GOP did keep the state in 2014, but holy hell, Sam Brownback.)
  10. The Emerging Democratic Majority Turns 10, The Atlantic
  11. Inconceivable!
  12. E. Frank, J. Carrera, and S. Dharamsi. Political Self-characterization of U.S. Medical Students, Journal of General Internal Medicine. Apr 2007; 22(4): 514–517.
  13. Millennials in Adulthood, Pew Research
  14. The Effects of Union Membership on Democratic Voting, The New York Times
  15. Is a Democratic realignment afoot in the middle class?, Washington Post
  16. Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History, Gallup
  17. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/12/the-battle-within-the-democratic-party/282235/
United States 2008 presidential election articles on RationalWiki
Topics: Debate:Religious beliefs and public office - Mission accomplished - Same-sex marriage - United States Electoral College - Values Voter Debate 2007

Parties: Constitution Party - Democratic Party - Green Party - Libertarian Party - Republican Party
Candidates: Baldwin (Con) - Brownback (R) - Clinton (D) - Giuliani (R) - Huckabee (R) - Keyes (R) - McCain (R) - McKinney (Green) - Obama (D) - Paul (R) - Romney (R) Running mates: Biden (D) - Palin (R)
Winner: Barack Obama

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools