Periodic Table

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
The poetry of reality
Icon science.svg
We must know.
We will know.
A view from the
shoulders of giants.
Warning icon orange.svg This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.

Periodic Table could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

The Periodic Table is a chart which organises chemical elements into groups based on their various properties - ascending by atomic number and grouped by things such as reactivity and valency. While it was first organised by these macroscopic properties, it actually forms a map of the atomic orbital structure indicating how quantum mechanical concepts relate to chemical properties. The Table was invented by Russian chemist Dmitri Mendeleyev in the second half of the 19th century, though others were part of a push towards order in the chemical world.


Chemical behaviour is generally very messy, complicated and irregular.[1] Chemists, in contrast, are more usually aspergic types who enjoy making neat and tidy lists of things. By the 17th century, chemists had begun to use the concept of an "element" in its modern sense (i.e. a substance which cannot be broken down into a simpler substance using chemical means) - which was nice and tidy - but, distressingly, they had also begun to discover dozens of new elements besides those which had been known for centuries - this was distressing untidy. A glimmer of hope was at hand, however: it was noticed that many of these newly discovered elements appeared to exhibit similar properties, seeming almost to belong to 'families'. Moreover, these similar properties often seemed to exhibit trends when the elements were placed in order of atomic weightWikipedia's W.svg. Examples included "triads" such as chlorine, bromine and iodine, and copper, silver and gold.

The race was on amongst chemists to draw up some kind of nice tidy list which would arrange the ever-increasing numbers of these pesky new elements in some kind of elegant way which brought order to the increasing chemical mess. The breakthrough was finally made by Mendeleev. His Table managed to set out the elements in rows and columns, in order (more or less) of atomic weight, so that those elements with similar properties fell into nice tidy vertical groups. Mendeleev made two particular innovations over previous pedants:

  • in a couple of cases where listing the elements in order of atomic weight would have messed up his groups, he swapped elements round so that they fitted the pattern
  • in further cases where listing the elements in any order wouldn't fit the pattern at all, he declared there must be a "missing element" and left a gap for it in the table.

However, Mendeleev couldn't, at the time, provide any physical explanation of why there should be missing elements, or why atomic weights occasionally needed swapping around. The trends were evident, but the knowledge of atomic structure and the identity of the missing elements was still far off, meaning that there was no verifiable proof that the periodic table was as Mendeleev hypothesised. Still, he stuck to his hypothesis, and the testable predictions of what properties these missing elements ought to have if and when they were discovered. Luckily for him, his predictions were correct!

Later, the discovery of atomic structure (protons, neutrons and electrons) provided a sound rationalising for Mendeleev's quirky ad hoc tweaks, and vindicated his periodic table. It was discovered that the shared properties of similar elements was due to these their having the same number of electrons in their outer shells. Thus, silicon has similar reactivities to carbon, although their difference in physical size also affects these properties. These observed facts are combined in their arrangement in the modern Periodic Table of the Elements.

Elements in the table are sorted by the increasing number of protons in their nuclei, from 1 to somewhere around 120. The structure of the table is based on the electronic structure of the atom: in the "p" block for example, there are elements for which the outermost electron is in a "p" orbital.

And here it is![edit]

Group # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1 H
2 LiWikipedia's W.svg
BeWikipedia's W.svg
BWikipedia's W.svg
NWikipedia's W.svg
NeWikipedia's W.svg
3 NaWikipedia's W.svg
MgWikipedia's W.svg
AlWikipedia's W.svg
SiWikipedia's W.svg
PWikipedia's W.svg
SWikipedia's W.svg
ClWikipedia's W.svg
ArWikipedia's W.svg
4 KWikipedia's W.svg
CaWikipedia's W.svg
ScWikipedia's W.svg
TiWikipedia's W.svg
VWikipedia's W.svg
CrWikipedia's W.svg
MnWikipedia's W.svg
FeWikipedia's W.svg
CoWikipedia's W.svg
NiWikipedia's W.svg
CuWikipedia's W.svg
ZnWikipedia's W.svg
GaWikipedia's W.svg
GeWikipedia's W.svg
AsWikipedia's W.svg
SeWikipedia's W.svg
BrWikipedia's W.svg
KrWikipedia's W.svg
5 RbWikipedia's W.svg
SrWikipedia's W.svg
YWikipedia's W.svg
ZrWikipedia's W.svg
NbWikipedia's W.svg
MoWikipedia's W.svg
TcWikipedia's W.svg
RuWikipedia's W.svg
RhWikipedia's W.svg
PdWikipedia's W.svg
AgWikipedia's W.svg
CdWikipedia's W.svg
InWikipedia's W.svg
SnWikipedia's W.svg
SbWikipedia's W.svg
TeWikipedia's W.svg
IWikipedia's W.svg
XeWikipedia's W.svg
6 CsWikipedia's W.svg
BaWikipedia's W.svg
* HfWikipedia's W.svg
TaWikipedia's W.svg
WWikipedia's W.svg
ReWikipedia's W.svg
OsWikipedia's W.svg
IrWikipedia's W.svg
PtWikipedia's W.svg
TlWikipedia's W.svg
BiWikipedia's W.svg
PoWikipedia's W.svg
AtWikipedia's W.svg
RnWikipedia's W.svg
7 FrWikipedia's W.svg
** RfWikipedia's W.svg
DbWikipedia's W.svg
SgWikipedia's W.svg
BhWikipedia's W.svg
HsWikipedia's W.svg
MtWikipedia's W.svg
DsWikipedia's W.svg
RgWikipedia's W.svg
CnWikipedia's W.svg
NhWikipedia's W.svg
FlWikipedia's W.svg
McWikipedia's W.svg
LvWikipedia's W.svg
TnWikipedia's W.svg
OgWikipedia's W.svg

* LaWikipedia's W.svg
CeWikipedia's W.svg
PrWikipedia's W.svg
NdWikipedia's W.svg
PmWikipedia's W.svg
SmWikipedia's W.svg
EuWikipedia's W.svg
GdWikipedia's W.svg
TbWikipedia's W.svg
DyWikipedia's W.svg
HoWikipedia's W.svg
ErWikipedia's W.svg
TmWikipedia's W.svg
YbWikipedia's W.svg
LuWikipedia's W.svg
** AcWikipedia's W.svg
ThWikipedia's W.svg
PaWikipedia's W.svg
UWikipedia's W.svg
NpWikipedia's W.svg
PuWikipedia's W.svg
AmWikipedia's W.svg
CmWikipedia's W.svg
BkWikipedia's W.svg
CfWikipedia's W.svg
EsWikipedia's W.svg
FmWikipedia's W.svg
MdWikipedia's W.svg
NoWikipedia's W.svg
LrWikipedia's W.svg

Metals Metalloids Nonmetals Unknown
Alkali metals Alkaline earth metals Inner transition metals Transition metals Post-transition metals Other nonmetals Halogens Noble gases
Lanthanides Actinides

External links[edit]


  1. More specifically:
    • Inorganic Chemist: "Inorganic chemistry is messy, complicated and irregular and therefore interesting. Organic chemistry is boring and predictable."
    • Organic Chemist: "Organic chemistry is messy, complicated and irregular and therefore interesting. Inorganic chemistry is boring and predictable."