RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/A New Radical Centrism

A New Radical Centrism | Result: Deleted

A New Radical Centrism (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Seems to be very small, standard alt-rightist. Not expansive enough to warrant an article IveBeenFrank (talk) 17:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
2. Just some random guy on Twitter, it seems like. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 18:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
3. A quick google search gives me no impression of wider influence.-Flandres (talk) 18:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
4. Seems to be completely unknown outside their facebook/twitter bubble. Why bother? —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 18:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
5. A nobody with a blog is still a nobody. A nobody with a YouTube channel is still a nobody. A nobody who happens to be on Twitter and Facebook is most definitely just a nobody and doesn't warrant an article. Spud (talk) 01:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
6. Bongolian (talk) 01:58, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
7. Article was written by Smith, the guy seems to be a nobody and the article represents some of the worst of our "hear ye, this man is a cunt", without adding substance to it, problem that some of our articles have. Three reasons to delete and none to keep make this an easy decision. Techpriest ^{(I am Alpharius! / / / )} 11:03, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
8. This is a Smith article, not one of his best works. While I'm marginally inclined, to keep Smith's work as a set, I'll go with the mob here. Judge Dredd (talk) 11:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep

1. The user:A New Radical Centrism is unlikely the real user but an impersonator. See the discussion on article talk I made. 143.110.166.152 (talk) 18:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

   I'm not sure why that issue is being brought up, as it was not stated as a reason by the delete camp. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 18:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

   A suspicious account A New Radical Centrism suddenly shows up and within 12 hours there is a article for deletion page. Had that fake/impersonator account not shown up there would be no vote for deletion. It's obvious why the impersonation was made - to get this article deleted. The person creating these fake accounts, has a vendetta against the article creator and wants to remove all his page creations. Enigma (talk) 20:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

   That's quite a leap. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 23:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

   Fake account complained, so we looked at the article as a matter of course. The article sucked, hence the vote. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 00:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

   Even if it's Mike posing as ANRC, it shouldn't hold bearing to the quality of the page which is exceptionally low and is unlikely to be able to really improve, hence my support for removal. Keeping bad wiki pages up to own the Nazis isn't something I particularly care for. Techpriest ^{(I am Alpharius! / / / )} 11:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Goat

• On the one hand, he's something of a nobody. On the other hand, it appears that he wants to alter our coverage of him. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 18:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)