2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $10064.65Goal: $10000

RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Draft:Gynocentrism

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Draft:Gynocentrism | Result: Deleted[edit]

Draft:Gynocentrism (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. Hopelessly tiny stub; all "references" are shitty, weirdly-formatted ones from the shitty dumbfuck who made this shitty stub, with shitty views on women and anyone who finds his totally-not-misogynistic ideas absurd or disgusting, added in for shitty reasons. At best I think the somewhat-salvageable "examples" section could be merged into our existing "Misandry" article. --Goatspeed. Watch meCircularREmail2.gifasoningSee my experiments 07:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
  2. "Off with his head." — The Red Queen. Bongolian (talk) 07:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
  3. Per CR. Techpriest (I am Alpharius! / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 13:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
  4. Delete this poorly written crap, but add an entry to the to-do list as a placeholder in case someone comes along that can author a proper treatment of the subject. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 15:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
  5. This is covered under Misandry ans well as Radical feminism and to an extent Trans-exclusionary radical feminism. This is just an attempt by some MGTOW variety of misogynists to enter anti-feminist propaganda here. Knight CommanderIn ServiceTo HerGoatness 17:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
  6. Nuke it. Twodots (talk) 18:19, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. Vote to keep in draft, as it's a it's similar to other -isms that get their own pages at some point here. Neiltyson1fan (talk) 07:40, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]

  • We can just let this rot in draft space-Hastur! (talk) 07:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)