RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Fun:Goatse

Fun:Goatse | Result: Deleted

Fun:Goatse (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Really not the sort of page we should have, even if it is in funspace. —Kazitor, ^pending 04:35, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
2. What's the point of this page?! Nerd (talk) 02:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
3. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 19:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
4. It's really outlived it's humorousness. Cosmikdebris (talk) 21:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
5. From the talk page: "Really? Are we all sniggering 12-year-olds? People who are interested in Goatse can piss off to ED. Let's get rid of this." and that was back in 2011. Nothing about this has changed. 109.204.116.189 (talk) (Sophie) 109.204.116.189 (talk) 12:47, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
6. --It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 00:34, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Keep

1. It's goaty. Bongolian (talk) 23:47, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
2. But it's goat tho.—(((CheeseburgerFace)))  (talk • stalk) 02:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

   Just because it starts with same four letters? Weak. —Kazitor, ^pending 02:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

   Spiro will do that to you.—(((CheeseburgerFace)))  (talk • stalk) 02:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

3. Seems harmless. It's only a funspace page, after all. DuceMoosolini^{Novus Forum Romanum} 19:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Goat

• I don't get it. --It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 02:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
• There could be a larger discussion of what constitutes grounds for deleting Funspace pages. I don't think there's any clear policy. Would it be non-missionality? A lot could be deleted. Would it be not fun? It's rather subjective. Bongolian (talk) 03:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

  Regardless of the general case, I really don't think we should have a page about an old shock image; it's not a particularly good look. —Kazitor, ^pending 03:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)