RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Monica Crowley

Monica Crowley | Result: Kept

Monica Crowley (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Expand or delete. D1@m0ndD15c1 (talk) 17:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
2. —€h33s3βurg3rF@€3  (talk • stalk) 17:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Keep

1. Nope, just because it's a stub doesn't mean it should be deleted. There is no reason to delete this article even if it remains untouched. The important thing is that it has enough information for our readers to get a fair bit of understanding on the subject and deleting it just because it's too short removes that information. Not good, especially when this page has sources. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 18:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
2. It's not [1] an unexpanded stub, [2] hopelessly stubbish, or [3] useless. It's skimpy on sources and full of hot air, but that's not so unusual here. FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 19:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
3. No more 'expand or delete', please. - Smerdis of Tlön, ^{LOAD "*", 8, 1.} 23:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
4. Bad deletion reason. Missional, informative and there's nothing wrong with it - David Gerard (talk) 09:47, 3 September 2017 (UTC)