There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Monica Crowley
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Monica Crowley | Result: Kept[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Expand or delete. ⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 17:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- —チーズバーガー • めん
(talk • stalk) 17:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- Nope, just because it's a stub doesn't mean it should be deleted. There is no reason to delete this article even if it remains untouched. The important thing is that it has enough information for our readers to get a fair bit of understanding on the subject and deleting it just because it's too short removes that information. Not good, especially when this page has sources. --It's-a me,
LeftyGreenMario! 18:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- It's not [1] an unexpanded stub, [2] hopelessly stubbish, or [3] useless. It's skimpy on sources and full of hot air, but that's not so unusual here. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 19:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- No more 'expand or delete', please. - Smerdis of Tlön, LOAD "*", 8, 1. 23:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- Bad deletion reason. Missional, informative and there's nothing wrong with it - David Gerard (talk) 09:47, 3 September 2017 (UTC)