RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Xenogender 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is an archive page for an article that has been AfDed before. For the most recent AfD for this article, see here.
Xenogender | Result: Merged with non-binary gender[edit]
- Xenogender – (View log)
Delete[edit]
- Strange neologism with no science to back it up. If we take the description "genders which aren't accurately described by a 'human' understanding of gender" and replace "gender" with "science", we get a description of pseudoscience. If I go here I read things like "Having a gender which is bright, celestial, and radial." wut?! Carpetsmoker (talk) 13:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Pseudoscience is within our missions, yeah? WẽãšẽĩõĩďMethinks it is a Weasel 15:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Well, my point was more that this is a bunch of nonsense, rather than a serious thing that this page tried to sell. Carpetsmoker (talk) 00:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Pseudoscience is within our missions, yeah? WẽãšẽĩõĩďMethinks it is a Weasel 15:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: within mission but not widespread nor likely to ever be. Take a look at [1] to see where this is leading. Bongolian (talk) 18:55, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- Keep it as a separate concept. Merging it with non-binary genders is a bad idea since it seems to include otherkin and other odd neoglisms which could stigmatize the idea of non-binary genders.--Owlman (talk) 18:42, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
- Merge with non-binary gender. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Masturbation masturbation pies pies Brian Cox 15:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- What Ray said. Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 17:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- What Ray and Fuzzy said Hertzy (talk) 17:23, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- What, Ray, Fuzzy and Hertzy said. Bicyclewheel 17:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- What Bicycle, Hertzy, Fuzzy and ray said. Haha, just kidding, it's backwards get it, I just disrupted the whole chain (lol), trolled, lmfao, XD, so funny, get it? I'm dead, lol. 8/10 gr8 b8 m8. 𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈 (talk) 17:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- What Bicycle, Hertzy, Fuzzy and Ray said. It's forward again [because no two of us have done it!] Anyhoo, merge and can describe as pseudoscience in context of other stuff that's not.---Mona- (talk) 19:00, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
- How widespread is this phrase? If it's just something a handle of Tumblr users use I think a passing mention in our non-binary gender article is probably all that's needed. ЩєазєюіδMethinks it is a Weasel 15:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- ↑ Wot the mustelid sed. Pippa (talk) 17:23, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- That's 6 for redirect and 0 for keep. Snowball clause? FᴜᴢᴢʏCᴀᴛPᴏᴛᴀᴛᴏ, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 17:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)