RationalWiki:Articles for demotion/The BMJ

The BMJ | Result: Silver (6 for, 0 against)

The BMJ (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Promote to silver

1. The article is thorough, with lots of information not in the main WP BMJ article. I've cleaned citations and whatever else needed work. Two additional images added. Bongolian (talk) 01:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
2. Checks out. Carthage (talk) 01:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
3. Looks like a well-researched, well-written article with a lot of sources and just the right amount of humor! Sincerely, Postuhenin the neurodivergent doodlebug! (say hi! ^^) 03:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
4. Ag --Goatspeed. _{Watch me}CircularRasoning^{See my experiments} 23:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
5. Arcadium Trancefer (talk) 23:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
6. I like it. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 00:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Goat

1. Maybe. As a note, though, I'd like a more substantial criticism of the trans article(s) at some point (if desirable). It's kind of biting around the edges at the moment, which is fine but could possibly be improved. Although, Block's citation choice at least was at times pretty bad, so. Another note for the future: needs mention of the BMJ's role in promoting the COVID lab leak theory. But that's a quite controversial issue and I would want to bring the goods (proofs against it), possibly on a separate page dedicated to that whole topic before bringing it to this article. Chillpilled (talk) 06:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)