There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
- Go right ahead. If you work on it, I can guard the zoo for a little while. Punky Your mental puke relief 17:41, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Does the zoo have snakes? An iron, yet caring fist 17:43, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
The Open Society Foundation
Does anyone have some sources on how all these Soros conspiracy theories started? I am not saying it isn't a possibility,but I am interested into seeing how he came out to be the boogeyman.-Maeve (talk) 09:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think there's much to it beyond he's rich and he gives money to (not very) left-wing groups. Also he's Jewish, so all the anti-Semites can't help themselves in fingering him as one of the sinister Jewish puppetmasters. --Ymir (talk) 09:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
It does appear that Soros assisted in the confiscation of property from Jewish persons -- see https://youtu.be/Ar9EfzSnMZc?t=494 -- though this is not nearly as bad as the "Nazi collaborator" label implies. We should rectify the article. The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 00:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, refs 4 and 5 don't suggest that Soros had anything to do with weakening Russia's economy, and 5 doesn't seem to mention Soros at all(?). It appears that Soros made public comments to benefit his funds, but it seems a bit of a stretch to give him so much credit.
I understand that it is (supposed to be) a joke, but it doesn't really make any sense. Am I missing the punchline? Is it supposed to be that Soros is blamed for things that he didn't do? In this case maybe a link to someone blaming him might help? Lgs (talk) 05:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Helping undermine the Soviet Union is not "innocuous."
Yeltsin is not liked in most post-soviet states. There are very good reasons this anti-democratic right wing nationalist isn't liked. He destroyed their country, balkanized it, started several wars, killed millions through the results of economic hardship due to ruinous mass-privatization of the people's democratically-controlled industry he had no right to sell, and also left the American empire in a position of supreme, unchecked, global, hegemonic power, with all the disastrous results that entails.
Anyone who tried to cause this, and don't pretend nobody knew what would happen when Yeltsin took office, is a mass murderer and an American Imperialist. Neither of those things are innocuous and liberalism is not a cruelty-free ideology. Russia is right to ban this enemy of the Soviet people. — Unsigned, by: 188.8.131.52 / talk 13:55, 2 November 2018 (UTC)