User talk:物灵


@realDonaldTrump
Unemployment rates are the lowest in the U.S. in over ten years! I would like to see them go even lower.
11,641 Retweets 48,879 Likes
02:29 AM - 4 Sep 2025
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Welcome[edit]
Carthage (talk) 11:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC) Before that I have been reading for a long time.
Autopatrolled[edit]
Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.
We hope you enjoy your newfound POWER — and these external tools:
- Google Scholar Button (Chrome, Firefox) searches your highlighted text in Google Scholar. Easily check academic citations!
- web.archive.org and archive.today, among other tools, can save permanent copies of webpages. Never lose a crank website or racist Tweet ever again! Carthage (talk) 11:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Sysop[edit]
Carthage (talk) 12:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi, could I ask what you mean by "turned right with age".[edit]
I'm not trying to stir any conflict I'm just curious.— Unsigned, by: 1.43.236.241 / talk / contribs
Hello, IP user. Anyway, I am touched that someone asks me questions, no matter how boring or bizarre. I am still questioning myself, so my reply is super confusing, but let me share some basic ideas.
The cause is animism for the development of human creative work (I know of no better catch-all terms for things we believe to need a genius to exist, e.g. science or literature. I will only exemplify science hereinafter). But does it really need a genius, or is genius a real concept? Everyone around me, including leftists, has either exaggerated the distinction of competence (i.e. geniuses even breathe differently from ordinary people) or, to the other extreme, implicitly adopted some thought-terminating clichés, including:
- Everyone is a genius, only misplaced
- Creativity is from practical issues
- There are no geniuses, only social superior people
- Literature works are great because they witness history
A darker view that convinced me recently is that both excellent creativity and science come from coincidence (and a genius tends to do well in any creation). It is essentially science exceptionalism. Science exceptionalism is not that bad after all. Science and technology have been bedmates for only decades, and are not impossible to decouple shortly. At that time science will become a game of nobility again, whether exceptional or not. However, much of the clichés above are favourable for leftists or even in their words, regarding science as merely another human artifact.
物灵 (talk) 11:30, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
And it is ChatGPT that made me rethink the clichés. Whether science are all from people, and whether science are from all people, are both questions. So I tried to compare it with mentioned animism.