User talk:物灵

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  Follow  Иконка шеврона вниз (ei).svg
Donald Trump Twitter.jpg
Donald Trump Icono verificacion de cuenta twitter
@realDonaldTrump

Unemployment rates are the lowest in the U.S. in over ten years! I would like to see them go even lower.

11,641 Retweets 48,879 Likes

02:29 AM - 4 Sep 2025

Speech bubble text.svg 82 Ei-retweet.svg 472 Twitter web heart animation.png 354

Welcome[edit]

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, 物灵!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Carthage (talk) 11:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC) Before that I have been reading for a long time.

Autopatrolled[edit]

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound POWER — and these external tools:

Sysop[edit]

Carthage (talk) 12:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, could I ask what you mean by "turned right with age".[edit]

I'm not trying to stir any conflict I'm just curious.— Unsigned, by: 1.43.236.241 / talk / contribs

Hello, IP user. Anyway, I am touched that someone asks me questions, no matter how boring or bizarre. I am still questioning myself, so my reply is super confusing, but let me share some basic ideas.

The cause is animism for the development of human creative work (I know of no better catch-all terms for things we believe to need a genius to exist, e.g. science or literature. I will only exemplify science hereinafter). But does it really need a genius, or is genius a real concept? Everyone around me, including leftists, has either exaggerated the distinction of competence (i.e. geniuses even breathe differently from ordinary people) or, to the other extreme, implicitly adopted some thought-terminating clichés, including:

A darker view that convinced me recently is that both excellent creativity and science come from coincidence (and a genius tends to do well in any creation). It is essentially science exceptionalism. Science exceptionalism is not that bad after all. Science and technology have been bedmates for only decades, and are not impossible to decouple shortly. At that time science will become a game of nobility again, whether exceptional or not. However, much of the clichés above are favourable for leftists or even in their words, regarding science as merely another human artifact.

物灵 (talk) 11:30, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

And it is ChatGPT that made me rethink the clichés. Whether science are all from people, and whether science are from all people, are both questions. So I tried to compare it with mentioned animism.

物灵 (talk) 11:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)