User talk:Jinxmchue

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi Wave.gif. Welcome, and thanks for making an edit - though I'm not sure that you fully understand what the site is about. If you'd like to know a bit more about the site please have a look at our RationalWiki:Newcomers' guide as this could clarify things.--Bobbing up 14:16, 1 August 2008 (EDT)

Hi, Jinxmchue! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:28, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

Jinx haz an R-kaiv: - 1 - 2 -

Do you know what?[edit]

You are an idiot. You want proof? Just choose any entry at random here and here. Editor at CPOh, Finland! Why? 12:37, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

You lie, I actually had to randomly choose TWICE to get this. NightFlarei haz a talk page. 12:43, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
Dear Jinx, it has come to my attention that you are a helplessly hairless can opener, and that, beyond any doubt, you receive as a favor for can openers. Have a very hairless can opener, and may you be receiveed into oblivion by a hoard of can openers. can openerspeed! ĴάΛäšςǍ₰ hi there!
Peanut wankle knocker argyle drinks. 00:20, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
Jinx.... Why don't you just create an account? SirChuckBBATHE THE WHALES!!!! 00:36, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
My not creating an account is (much) more important than you. 10:12, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
No, it means that you're too bone idle to do so. Silver Sloth 10:15, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
Now why does that sound strangely familiar, Jinx? ^_^ New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 10:19, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
I don't know. One of your brain cells is trying to communicate with the other. Rattle your head around. It might help them get together. 11:03, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
You know, when a creationist tries to insult someone's intelligence, it's not particularly hurtful, Jinx. New3.pngPink(Hilarious is what it is!) 11:15, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
This is like watching sperm whales juggle, please, continue. ArmondikoVtheist 11:12, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
AHAHAHAHAHA! Is that all you've got? Oh, it is. No wonder your site is the cesspool it is, you mouthbreathers can't even use the small brain you've got and use a decent insult. NightFlare National Review is clueless. Forrest Gump, featuring liberal Tom Hanks, is liberal claptrap.[1] 11:21, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

(unindent) Let me say, as the one who started this little topic... It just makes sense... I can see no reason for you to continue using your IP. We already know it's you, you've admitted as much and we have backup in the form of Wikipedia, you're obviously communicating with us so it's not to hide you from the powers that be at CP.... What intelligent reason would you have to not regisitering an account? That's all I'm saying.... I really don't care one way or the other, it's not like it influences my life in any way SirChuckBBATHE THE WHALES!!!! 11:55, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

That reminds me, I gotta add stuff to bunchanumber's public userpage! NightFlare The odds against a [particular] Muslim converting to Christianity are less than 100 to 1, as far fewer less than 1% of the over 1 billion Muslims convert to Christianity each year.[2] 11:59, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
That it obviously royally pisses you off that I don't register (so much so that you keep bringing it up) is more than enough intelligent reasoning for me to not register. 13:31, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
You flatter yourself too much, Mr 67. I doubt that anybody is significantly pissed off (royally or otherwise) that you only appear to us in numerical form. As Sir Chuck said, it really doesn't influence anything whether you register here or not. Take it or leave it. weaseLOIdWeaselly.jpg~ 14:02, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
Um... yeah, I just brought it up because there seems to be no rational reason not to..... In fact, if you had your own account, you could put whatever crap you wanted to on your user page (within legal limits) and we wouldn't be adding crap on our own... But if you like dancing bananas, that's your business. SirChuckBBATHE THE WHALES!!!! 14:33, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
Well, people have registered at Conservapedia so why not at least return the favour! I mean, we don't block people for no reason and don't bully and censor people so it's not like you're going to get worse treatment, in fact, it'd be better because RWikians would respect someone wanting to sign up and contribute in positive way. ArmondikoVtheist 14:50, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
"we don't block people for no reason" lol! "and don't bully" rofl! "and censor people" ROFLMAO!!!! "RWikians would respect someone" *dies laughing* Not a single shred of truth in any of that. Well done! 15:54, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
And you show again and again how clever you are. I wonder how someone as clever as you isn't a Sysop yet at CP. Editor at CPOh, Finland! Why? 16:00, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Hey Jinx, fuck you. Love Ace. Ace McWickedcast ye the first stone 16:02, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Hey Jinx.... do you have any proof that there is no truth to this... Or is it one of those things you magically know? and while we're on it. Tim has page here, TK used to, Ken has a few, we're pretty sure and others from CP have been on both sites at once... and while we're at it.. YOU'RE HERE YOU IDIOT. We could have easily blocked your IP a long time ago... but, unlike Herr Schlafly et al, we allow just about everyone to come here, as long as you're not a vandal. SirChuckBBATHE THE WHALES!!!! 16:04, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
Ya, what he said. Well, as I tried to be slightly more civil and got laughed at (part expected to be fair), Jinx can go rape his kids again for all I care now. I hope no CP editor does sign up here, I hope they keep posting annonymously or using the Red Telephone, making arses of themselves through childish antics (at least RW childish antics don't pretend to be otherwise, that's the difference). But, at least we know we make coherent posts and don't resort to "ROFLMAO!!!!" like that... ArmondikoVtheist 16:15, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Oh, I guess you're right. These were all very good reasons for blocking me:

  • 17:00, 4 September 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 30 minutes (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (For my entertainment, as always :))
  • 21:47, 1 September 2008 Human (Talk | contribs) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 314 sec. (5 minutes) () ‎ (Not using multiple accounts)
  • 03:59, 1 September 2008 SusanG (Talk | contribs) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 8 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Please do not unblock - let the wanker sit it out this once. )
  • 03:42, 1 September 2008 DLerner (Talk | contribs) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 8 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Past your bedtime, Jinx. Go to sleep. )
  • 05:15, 31 August 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 8 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Childish insults. Way past your bedtime.)
  • 02:27, 28 August 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 5 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (I said bedtime, little boy.)
  • 20:34, 27 August 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 5 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Infant games: And the cycle continues!)
  • 01:42, 25 August 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 5 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (I'm awake too, Lerner, but it's *way* past Jinx's bedtime. We can't in good conscience let him continue editing when he should be snoozing.)
  • 00:37, 25 August 2008 Pink (Talk | contribs) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 8 hours (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Bedtime, Jinxy. No dinner for you, either.)
  • 22:02, 20 August 2008 Ace McWicked (Talk | contribs) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 60 sec () ‎ (because i dont like you. asshole)

And no bullying going on here:

Nope. 16:25, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Awww... does poor widdle jwixy think he's been hard done by for a 60 second bwock when his [Andrew Schlafly|Mistress] wegularly bwocks people for 5 years or infinity after making next to no edits? ArmondikoVtheist 16:33, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
<edit conflict>What he said. None of those blocks were for more than a few hours, compared to CP where users are blocked for months or years with no warning. As for the user page, you've already been told that, if you create an account, you can do as you like with your user page (more or less). As long as you continue to respond 'anonymously' as 67.135.etc, you can expect us to amuse ourselves with your page. If you consider a couple dancing bananas to be bullying, then you really have a strange definition of the concept. weaseLOIdWeaselly.jpg~ 16:35, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
I love how pretty much all the blocks are from me ^_^
Poor Jinxy... Is that nasty Pink bullying you again? :( New3.pngPink(Bliss) 16:39, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
I just can't wait for the 4 1/2 minutes I slapped on him to end and for more crying, let me taste the tears :). I should have made it even less just to make the point clearer. Can we block for milliseconds? I'd prefer femtosecond blocks just to get the point across but that would be science! ArmondikoVtheist 16:41, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
More to the point, you realise it's actually perfectly fair to block vandals (that would be you) and trolls (you again), right? New3.pngPink(It's not too complicated) 16:46, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
Is that better now, Jinx? Th hug.gif weaseLOIdWeaselly.jpg~ 16:46, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
(3ECs)your block log proves nothing... Have a look at some of the other users block logs... From Mine:
  • 07:58, 16 April 2008 Genghis Khant (Talk | contribs | block) blocked SirChuckB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 314 sec. (5 minutes) (autoblock disabled) ‎ (Daring to ask a question) (unblock)
  • 16:05, 19 August 2008 DLerner (Talk | contribs | block) blocked SirChuckB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 271 sec. ( about 4½ minutes) (account creation disabled) ‎ (If you want to mispell my name go to WP. It's DLERNER! NO FUCKING "A") (unblock)
  • 18:00, 26 August 2008 DickTurpis (Talk | contribs | block) blocked SirChuckB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 3 seconds (account creation disabled) ‎ (disruptive edits at main page talk; contradicting a bureaucrat. use your real first name and last initial.) (unblock)
  • 17:42, 5 September 2008 DickTurpis (Talk | contribs | block) blocked SirChuckB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 271 sec. ( about 4½ minutes) (account creation disabled) ‎ ("You people" have been causing too much trouble on this quality site. It ends now!) (unblock)
Also keep in mind that I don't have a history of vandalizing pages.... Like ::ahem::some people involved in this particular conversation. I know this might be a novel concept for you, considering your site just locks everything down when Andy goes to bed.... But when you have a known vandal who edits at odd times, you don't just let him have free run when most of the Admins are not around to clean it up... And I have a little challenge for you Jason, Mayor of Tenochtitlan, look through the Conservapedia block logs and see how many people have one as extensive as yours is here.... I figure it'll be kind of hard because you guys have this habit of permabanning at the drop of a hat. Moron. SirChuckBBATHE THE WHALES!!!! 16:50, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

You know Jinx, I have been blocked here more times than you but I dont wet my pants and cry to mummy about being bullied. I mean, come on dude, man up for fucks sake. You little wet end! Ace McWickedcast ye the first stone 16:52, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Fucking a, but you are dense. I DIDN'T BRING IT UP UNTIL ONE OF YOU MORONS CLAIMED YOU DON'T DO IT!!!! Seriously, do you eat stupid for breakfast every morning or what? 17:02, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
Jinx, 'stupid' is an adjective, not a noun, YOU FUCKING MORON!!! weaseLOIdWeaselly.jpg~ 17:08, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
lol! Main Entry: 2stupid Function: noun Date: 1712 : a stupid person Who's a fucking moron, asswipe? Seriously, you jackasses need to do your homework before trying to be clever. You almost always fail. 17:55, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
So did you attempt to imply cannibalizing a stupid person makes you stupid? Fail. NightFlare The odds against a [particular] Muslim converting to Christianity are less than 100 to 1, as far fewer less than 1% of the over 1 billion Muslims convert to Christianity each year.[2] 14:52, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
For breakfast I drink scotch mixed with your childrens tears. Ace McWickedcast ye the first stone 17:06, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
So that would be "yes," then. Thank you. 17:56, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
Oh Jinx, I do so love our times together. You remind me of myself when I was child. Now be a dear and fuck off. Ace McWickedcast ye the first stone 18:03, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

One for the collection, biatch: 22:01, 2 October 2008 Bondurant (Talk | contribs | block) blocked (Talk) with an expiry time of 314 sec. (5 minutes) (anonymous users only) ‎ (Cause I haven't blocked you thus far) (unblock) Love from Bondurant 18:05, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Jinx, since you're accusing some of abuse, please answer my questions that you've failed to give any notice. It's okay if you don't answer in the archive, right here in this section is just fine. Thanks. NorsemanWassail! 18:42, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Hey, lets not just gloss over this.... Jason, my friend, really? That's the best you've got? Did you ever even watch an actual debate? You cannot just reflect the question and think everyone will go along. Starting from the top. I asked you why you didn't just create an account... After a bit of back and forth, Armondikov said that we don't block people for ideological differences or spite (something along those lines, I don't remember the exact words he used) to which you responded with the ever so mature Lol, Rolfmao and other such teenage expressions. When pressed further, you posted your block log as proof that we do execute mean and bullying blocks. As a response, I (and a few others) posted our block logs and reminded you what your "Trustworthy" site does.... That is not being dense, it's called a counter argument. As a matter of fact, it's a Logos based argument of similar example followed by counterexample. If you weren't as stupid as the dancing bananas that now cover your page, you would have figured this out. One last thing, because I'm sure you have an audition with Mel Gibson for Apocalypto II (good luck dog, good luck) But trying to deflect your own stupidity with "I didn't bring it up" doesn't work in this situation. No matter who brought it up, you still bitched about bullying on this site. SirChuckBBATHE THE WHALES!!!! 11:41, 3 October 2008 (EDT)


Jinx, haven't enough rounds gone by for you to get another save versus the Feeblemind spell Andy cast on you? --Edgerunner76 16:35, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Under which rules? Original D&D, AD&D, 2nd Ed., 3rd Ed. 3.5, or 4th Ed? 17:04, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
Andy isn't high enough level to cast Feeblemind. I think we're rather looking at an unfortunate roll of the dice during character creation. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 17:16, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

What are Jinx's ability scores right now?:

STR 12

DEX 12

CON 12

INT 12

WIS 12

CHA 12


Please note: When referring to JinxmcHue as "Jinx", it is correct to use the definite article thus: The Jinx. Failure to comply is lèse majesté of the highest order and may be treated as treason! Expect a visit from the FBI! SusanG  ContribsTalk 08:48, 3 October 2008 (EDT)

Didn't you retire?[edit]

Jinx, when you said on CP that you are seeking treasures of another world, were you referring to RW? CorryI think hallucinations are a side effect of Teamocil. 17:13, 24 November 2008 (EST)

Jinx, are you there?[edit]

We miss you Jinx, please come back.... We promise we'll treat you real nice and everything.... But seriously, Jinx Baiting season starts soon, and I really want out team in peak form before our first match.... We can't afford another loss to the parodist team from CP. Come back, please...... SirChuckBBATHE THE WHALES!!!! 14:45, 10 December 2008 (EST)

Why are you back?[edit]

I thought you were waiting for God to tell you what to do with your life. Did he tell you that you can do no better than annoy people on the internet? - User \scriptstyle2\int_{-1}^{1}\sqrt{1-x^{2}}dx 19:40, 24 January 2009 (EST)

Still loitering around, Jinx?[edit]

Toast s.png (Toast) and marmalade 21:04, 30 January 2009 (EST)

And still completely lacking any self-awareness. Vandalizing our site to complain about vandalism? How "Old Testament" of you. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 21:06, 30 January 2009 (EST)
Yes, I created it, Jinx. Feel free to discuss it with me on my talk page. The same goes for any other CP users, or indeed anyone. Stile4aly 21:11, 30 January 2009 (EST)


YOU WERE HERE AGAIN!!!! Damn Damn DAMN! I missed it! I was on holiday all last week but had I known you'd be hanging around I would have flown back early. We had fucking good times together didnt we sweetheart? Oh well, next time drop me a line if you come back and we'll reopen our lines of communication. Ace McWickedRevolt 17:10, 1 February 2009 (EST)

Hey Jinx- there's a new evil libural player on the block, you beetle-brained buffon. --"ConservapediaUndergroundResistorGoatspeed! 17:14, 1 February 2009 (EST)
Jason, I'm hurt man.....You can back and don't even drop by to say hello. That hurts on a personal level. SirChuckBBATHE THE WHALES!!!! 18:34, 1 February 2009 (EST)

JINXY BABY!![edit]

You're back! Hurrah! God I missed your scum-soured face! Be a dear and tell me to "get fucked!". Come on! I know you wanna, you slimly ball of fetid vaginal discharge! Ace McWickedRevolt 14:53, 11 February 2009 (EST)

Yay Jinxy!!! Neveruse513 16:44, 9 April 2009 (EDT)

Can you clear this up?[edit]

Did any American president before Obama ever bow to a foreign leader? Neveruse513 17:02, 9 April 2009 (EDT)

I am honored[edit]

I feel deeply honored that you chose me, of all people, to recieve your wrath. I am not worthy of such a priviledge, but I will try to live up to it. --<choose> <option>Input The ResistorOutput</option> <option>CoyoteOver 450 pages watched NOT including talk pages</option> <option>The Trickster</option> <option>Acionyx</option> 19:31, 9 April 2009 (EDT)

Member of parodist/vandal site[edit]


TK is pissing all over you, get fucking Schlafly on the phone! Ahahahaha. Ace McWickedbitch and moan 23:15, 9 April 2009 (EDT)
Now Ace this is no way to treat one of our memebers. Jinx has worked hard, parodying Andy, pretending to believe all his Obama and Lenski crap to obtain block rights just like Bugler and RobWeathers did and this is how you treat him. Its okay Jinx you are always welcome here as one of the best parodists we ever produced, I mean you didn't even get a fake name and you got away with it this long, that is some quality trolling. - User \scriptstyle2\int_{-1}^{1}\sqrt{1-x^{2}}dx 02:24, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
Good point Pi. Your subversion Jinx was so well done, you even set up several blogs (shock and blog for example) in order to sew your deceitful seeds. Ace McWickedbitch and moan 02:55, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
We even added that tactic to the parodist guide. I mean Jinx said some pretty crazy things, he even went into a discussion on an orgasming statue and got away with it because he appeared to be a True ConservativeTM. Jinx you were one of the best, although I think you should give up on this handle, get a new IP, a new name and this time don't register here under it. Better lluck next time I reckon you will be the first RationalWikian to become a sysop at Conservapedia. - User \scriptstyle2\int_{-1}^{1}\sqrt{1-x^{2}}dx 05:06, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Hey fucking scumbag![edit]

Stop messing around with your dried up phallus of yours while thinking about Valley of the Horses and respond to me! Where's your messiah Jinx? You wont find him inside that thing your tugging. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 05:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Information icon.svg This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.