User talk:Ace McWicked/Archive18

A comment regarding your friend.

In response to your question here, my short acquaintance with the fellow suggests he is the sort of person who craves attention the way some people crave heroin or meth. If he can't get positive attention he will do something strange and provocative to get negative attention. All that matters is that he gets attention. The quandary is that some of the things he does can't simply be ignored, but by responding to him in any way at all (whether to agree or smack him down) you're playing his game. Doctor Dark (talk) 03:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. Aceⁱ⁹ 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

whatthehell happened, Ace?

I take some time off to stuff the ballot box GOTV for Rmoney and you do the honorable thing? I'm impressed. Never thought you had it in you. nobs^{Corporations are people, too} 16:59, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Ewww, Rob. Aceⁱ⁹ 19:46, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Funny typo, Rob. Генгис^marauding 20:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

As can be plainly seen, sometimes the interests of the whole take precedence over individual parts. Maybe there is something to be said for communism. nobs^{Corporations are people, too} 20:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

John Nash

Saw a movie last nite starring New Zealander Russel Crowe about Nobel Laureate wp:John Nash. Researching Nash made me think about you:

“”I later spent times of the order of five to eight months in hospitals in New Jersey, always on an involuntary basis... In these interludes of, as it were, enforced rationality, I did succeed in doing some respectable mathematical research....But after my return to the dream-like delusional hypotheses in the later 60's I became a person of delusionally influenced thinking but of relatively moderate behavior and thus tended to avoid hospitalization and the direct attention of psychiatrists.

Perhaps RW could use an entry on Nash. According to WP, his theories are used in market economics, computing, evolutionary biology, artificial intelligence, accounting, politics, military and game theory. nobs^{Corporations are people, too} 17:23, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Russel Crowe has been disowned by NZ. Aceⁱ⁹ 19:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Well, Crowe's portrayal of Nash is convincing, if not exceptional (even under the direction of that commie Ron Howard). But Nash is the object here, with "enforced rationality...I became a person of delusionally influenced thinking but of relatively moderate behavior ...", describes perfectly your Rationalwiki career. I'm sure you can relate. nobs^{Corporations are people, too} 00:19, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

You're only saying Ron Howard is a commie because he has red hair. Aceⁱ⁹ 00:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

No, I heard him apologize on the Tonight Show because when he was 8 years old he once made a TV appearance with Ronald Reagan. Normally this type of irrational behavior would be considered psychotic, but in this case it appears he's just a typical hardcore, hate-filled communist. nobs^{Corporations are people, too} 02:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Many of things you say should be considered psychotic. Aceⁱ⁹ 02:19, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

BFD, it wouldn't preclude a person from being a Nobel Laureate, or for that matter getting millions of dollars in government contracts and being a CEO of a Fortune 500 company. nobs^{Corporations are people, too} 02:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

What does this have to do with Nash or Russel Crowe? Aceⁱ⁹ 02:37, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Jus' sayin'. delusionally influenced thinking but of relatively moderate behavior describes you pretty good of late within the confines and structure of Rationalwiki's enforced rationality. You wanna collaborate on Nash or not? 02:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

You have a very interesting way of saying nothing at all. Aceⁱ⁹ 03:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Russell. Two L's. :p Refugee^{talk page} 20:52, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

We in NZ care not for the correct spelling of his name. Usually we spell it "p-r-i-c-k". Aceⁱ⁹ 21:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

I don't really care how it's spelled, I just wanted to post here to catch your attention, since we haven't talked for a while... it's like, oooo look at me, pay attention to meeeee! hehehe. Refugee^{talk page} 00:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes yes I see you. Aceⁱ⁹ 00:36, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Russell Crowe can't be that much of an idiot; getting out of New Zealand was probably the smartest career move he ever made. nobs^{Corporations are people, too} 00:46, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, a 4 year old Russell Crowe made the decision to move to Australia for career reasons. Aceⁱ⁹ 00:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Seeing as you chose my new nick...

--PsyGremlin^Praat! 12:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Hahaha, nice. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

...

02:55, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

hm

When do you get unblocked? 'Tis really slow over @PJRWiki 'n it might be dead by then. sterile^{sporadic heavy hitter} 02:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

March I think. Aceⁱ⁹ 01:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Asking a favour.

Rob and I have made a bet. As a neutral party that we both respect, could you please ensure that the loser of said wager fulfills the penalty as agreed upon? Thanks. Theory of Practice Still tryin' to figure it all out. 02:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Jah, sure. Aceⁱ⁹ 06:52, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Knob gag

Quality! I like. JzG (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Anyone would gag on Ace's knob. Генгис^{Is the Pope a Catholic?} 20:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Hope you brought some Difflam...

De la friendship

You my motherfucker. Imma hold you like piss.

18:08, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Word. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Hey

Kind of rude of me, but do you want to op me? <wink wink> Brenden (talk) 06:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

I would have but someone beat me to it. Aceⁱ⁹ 07:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Ha ha!!!

After searching and searching, I found it: Brxbrx's rendition of X-Mas carols. For your amusement. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 03:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh jesus god! Aceⁱ⁹ 03:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Steg

[1] 05:59, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Terry

All Terry's contact info is online. However I do see your point. Is it OK to leave the comment without the link?--Fergus Mason ^{Thruppence I got for selling my coat, tuppence for selling my blanket. If ever I 'list for a soldier again, the Devil shall be my Sergeant.} 01:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Email

I have sent you a vitally important email which, if actioned, could change the very nature of the space time continuum. It appears that you may have overlooked it. Damo^Hi 06:51, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

On it... Aceⁱ⁹ 09:52, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Cheers --Damo^Hi 07:24, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Sterile for mod

Sterile.

I'll be there. Will you?

Theory of Practice "...and we do love you madly." 01:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Ahhh dude I would love to but guess what I am doing instead? In June I am going here and here. Aceⁱ⁹ 01:22, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Driving in snow on a hilly dirt road in a tiny car

15:31, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Ace quote

"In NZ there is no culture of tipping and we pay people properly. You yanks are fucked up. Ace 9 4:22 pm, Yesterday (UTC−6)"

Love it. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 08:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

It is an adequate summary of the situation I agree. Hell, once in Florida I got told off for not tipping properly. The waitress actually came back to the table and told me it "wasn't good enough". Aceⁱ⁹ 19:52, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

I, myself, have never liked the idea of waitstaff making most of their wages based on tips. In my state, at least, they make a base salary of, at least, just above minimum wage (I think we are the only state in the US left, IIRC) and get any tips you've earned added on to that (whether those be tips of money of tips to fuck off, nobody cares), but I'm always amazed that most other states tie whether or not you can afford food to how generous the customers are feeling that night (i.e: pay well below minimum wage), which causes waitstaff to go insane about making tips at any cost and forces policies like "minimum tip required." Bunch of nonsense. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 10:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

In South Africa waiters get paid nothing but tips. Aceⁱ⁹ 18:35, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

But do South Africans tip well? Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Only if you push them far enough. Генгис^{Our ignorance is God; what we know is science.} 15:19, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

It's my understanding tipping is a Euro-centric tradition; I can only speculate why NZ hasn't continued it (poverty? unstable monetary supply? lack of empathy between social classes, etc.) But I sympathize greatly with Ace's experience in New York; you know them New Yorkers, damn greedy socialists & liberals with no compassion. nobs^{Say hello to my leetle friend} 19:44, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Probably the polar opposite of all three factors. Peter ^mqzp 19:47, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

In the United States, after slavery was abolished, tipping was an important source of income for a group of citizens who had trouble finding jobs for wages or commission with little experience of a money society. nobs^{Say hello to my leetle friend} 19:54, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Tipping has never been common in New Zealand. Because we pay people properly, Nob. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:21, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

What do you do when you get crappy service in a restaurant? Waiting on people must be little different than a working a dull assembly line. nobs^{Say hello to my leetle friend} 20:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Complain to the management and demand a discount. Aceⁱ⁹ 01:16, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Got this one from my comedy forum

A NZ'er moves to Australia and is embarrassed by his nationality. He is particularly aware of his unmistakable accent. One day he walks into a shop and asks for "five dollars worth of FUSH and CHUPS".

The shopkeeper immediately replies "You're from New Zealand aren't you?" Embarrassed, the man runs out.

Determined to rid himself of his accent, he practices: "FISH and CHIPS, not FUSH and CHUPS," over and over again.

For months, he passes by the shop, but never goes in. Finally, he feels ready to show off his perfect Aussie accent. He confidently strolls up to the counter, clears his throat and in a perfect Australian accent says "Five dollars worth of FISH and CHIPS Please."

Immediately the shopkeeper replies "You must be from New Zealand."

"OH NO" the man cries. "This accent always betrays my nationality. I just cannot hide it."

"It's got nothing to do with accents, mate," replies the shopkeeper. "This is a hardware store".

SirChuckB^{Go Naked, Hitler Wore Clothes} 06:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Pfffft. Aceⁱ⁹ 06:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi

Hey I've been huffing model airplane glue watching Cannonball Run II, a truly remarkable film, with Gang Starr No More Mr. Nice Guy as the soundtrack. Life is good. How's work? Chump. 04:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Just about to leave the office. It is my two year wedding anniversary so going to be busy tonight. Busy in the Luther Vandros/Barry White sense. Aceⁱ⁹ 04:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

If that's code for drinking breast milk at a wedding and vomiting in the fountain, sounds like a great evening.

That was a great day. Aceⁱ⁹ 10:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Fox Geezer Syndrome

I'm not sure why you felt so strongly the page had to go. Several other progressive blogs have mentioned Fox Geezer Syndrome, including Slacktivist and Huffpo; and it was hardly the most irreverent or least notable entry on RationalWiki. Would you mind commenting on how I could have made the page more appropriate content for RW?

Thanks!

It's source is a single blog. Not really notable enough for it's own stand-alone article. Why don't you instead create a section under David Frum as he invented the term? Aceⁱ⁹ 02:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

(EC) I'm not Ace, but I am prettier than he is. I suggest you add a section to the David Frum article. I was about to do this but Ace deleted it before I could get to it. Perhaps a bit of background of the disagreements between Fox and Frum should be added also (didn't he get banned from contributing on Fox after he had a dummy spit or something?). --Damo^Hi 02:26, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

I see. I don't think I'll bother creating it as a section under David Frum, since the general consensus on the talk page seems to be "who cares?" And anyway, I don't fancy rewriting the text from scratch. Thank you for taking the time to explain this to me; I'm not terribly familiar with the standards and practices of wikis, as you can probably tell. Heywood (talk) 20:27, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

No worries. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:49, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Don't take it too hard Heywood. Nearly all of my edits get reverted and I've been here 5 years. Damo^Hi 23:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Heh. Thanks. I wasn't thrilled to see it disappear... but I didn't take it personally. That way lies drama. :) Heywood (talk) 15:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

"but I am prettier than he is" - I think pictures of Ace & Damo wrestling in jello need to be submitted, so the mob can decide this. PsyGremlin^{Поговорите!} 15:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Premier or RZA?

Ghostface Editah (talk) 03:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Premier is too nice sounding. RZA hands down. Aceⁱ⁹ 03:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Premier's part of history tho. Right back to the early 80's. Check this out. Pro decks and production. One of my favorite records in the last few years.

Ghostface Editah (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Ja Ja. Aceⁱ⁹ 08:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Back to listening to this record 5 times a day. (formerly Ghostface Editah) 01:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

I have been hitting my techno 12's pretty heavily recently in lieu of hitting Europe later this year. Aceⁱ⁹ 01:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

I probably have 1000 50s-70s country LPs to get rid of. The whole back of my living room is stacked with crates since I stopped using physical media. Holla if you need some wax. (formerly Ghostface Editah) 01:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Oh she bought me a fur?

How's the trip? 17:39, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

it is excellent. Aceⁱ⁹ 21:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Drinking rye and listening to Public Enemy. 23:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Love this label. They rocked SXSW. 23:24, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

2nd Deltron 3030 record coming out in June. 12 years late. 15:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I tried

This is what we could have had if I wanted to waste time messing around with RW's css stylesheet. Oh well. It would have been nice. 03:55, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Japan

How did you like it? Where did you go?

Tokyo, Nikko, Takayama, Fuji, Kyoto and Osaka. Loved it - had an awesome time. Are you a yank or a Brit, weasel? I'll be in London in a couple months and for some reason I thought you are from there. Aceⁱ⁹ 07:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm a Brit, but not from London; I'm based in Nottingham. If there's a big RW happen-in going on in London, I can come down for that, but I think you said you're only gonna be in town for a couple of days in the middle of the week(?). Let me know.

I love Japan. Been there three times now, & it's definitely it's my favourite holiday destination (although expensive). Sounds like a good circuit you did. Wėąṣėḷőįď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 12:59, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Yeah it was expensive only in that for some reason going on holiday I always expect things to be cheaper than at home whereas Japan was like spending three weeks in a hotel back home and eating out for every meal. Now that Japan is done I need to find a new country to visit. I think (after my Europe trip in a few months) the wife and I might try Kenya. Or Turkey. I let you know about London closer to that time. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:59, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

don't expect London to be any cheaper AMassiveGay (talk) 11:35, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

I used to live in London so know how expensive it can be. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

and you left? You fool AMassiveGay (talk) 23:24, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

I lived there for a year and a half, then left for South America where I was for three months. Then I ran out of money so came home. Aceⁱ⁹ 23:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Liquor and pals

Am drunk with Neveruse. No frozen chicken this time. 04:24, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

In person or on the phone? It's morning time and my brother is staying with me. He is vomiting in the bathroom. Aceⁱ⁹ 22:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

How do you get drunk with someone other than in person. Tell your brother hi. I guess now that S is knocked up you can do whatever the fuck you want. 23:27, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

I gauantee we can get drunk over Skype or googlehangingout, you just can't share the whiskey. ^talk 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

It's the younger brother this time. I got home at about 11pm and feel asleep on the couch and woke to him leering and gibbering some drunken nonsense at me before making himself a little bed on the floor. Aceⁱ⁹ 02:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Call me I'm drunk. 01:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

At work. Aceⁱ⁹ 01:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Fuck you. 01:52, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

I do everyday. Aceⁱ⁹ 01:59, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

In case you need to be entertained, big soon-to-be-daddy

New creationist astronomy bibliography. ^talk 10:51, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Ahhh jesus fuck. Aceⁱ⁹ 22:33, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

I find it particularly hilarious that not all papers have anything to do with astronomy and many of them are VERY old. Would you be happy to willy nilly cite 30 year old papers on rapidly evolving subjects solely because they're by an author who happens to be a member of the same country club as you, Sterile? Also, I've been drinking for 4 hours yet managed to code something that would have been over my head sober. If I didn't gain a few pounds over the holiday from drinking and eating shitty food, I'd keep this up until my project is due. Yeah! 01:04, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Now, now, creation science is realatively new and oppressed by lack of funding from maintstream science.</end script> Actually, it's scary bc c-decay's in there, and I think the creationists don't go for that any more. ^talk 11:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

creation science is realatively new Is that so? Perhaps if evolutionists did their homework they would realise the Newton, Farraday, Kepler etc were all creationists. It is evolution which is new.

oppressed by lack of funding from maintstream science and censored. Glad you finally admit it. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Is it time for a PJR quote template like the assfly generator? At this point he's pretty easy to channel. 20:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

I have played around with it before but I never finished it. It needs to take random bits of text from the comment you are replying to and tq them. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

random Meaningful information isn't random. ^talk 00:21, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

.

Been drinking for 3 hours on an empty stomach after spending nearly 30 hours cranking a Rails app out for a presentation that didn't happen. Call me Sunday. 00:37, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

What's up fat cunt? 00:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Fuckin' GZA never ceases to amaze. 15:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I see what you did there

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brxbrx&curid=149713&diff=1202752&oldid=1202750 Thanks for that. I wasn't sure about it. d(^_^)b –Александр(а) Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 05:12, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Upcoming at Answers Research Journal

Abstract of unreleased article:

“” A Proposal for a New Solution to the Light Travel Time Problem by Danny R. Faulkner, AiG–U.S. I identify a little-noticed issue in the normal formulation of the light travel time problem. In addition, I lay groundwork for the beginning of a new solution to the problem. This solution invokes similarity between creative acts of Day Four and other days of the Creation Week, but especially Day Three. The Day Three account suggests unusually fast growth for plants. In similar fashion, this possible new solution suggests unusually fast propagation of light on Day Four, probably by rapid expansion of space. This is an appeal to a miraculous event rather than a physical process to get distant starlight to the earth. It is not yet clear whether this suggestion could have testable predictions. If this is the correct way to look at the problem, it may be that we are seeing much of the universe in something close to real time. I briefly compare this possible solution to the light travel time to other previously published proposals.

Honestly, why do they think this is a good idea? And if it's not testable, what's the point? ^talk 18:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

It's similar to the kind of things Walt Brown makes up. But think about it - homeostasis on earth is a delicate balance. Who knows what the practical effect of changing the speed of light would be. I guess you can figure it out. The weird stuff here is the suggestion that plants would thrive with more light. The subtext in appealing to miracles is ... they'd cook to cinders like any other living thing would. The "theory" doesn't serve creationists at all without miracles. We already know the answers otherwise. 19:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

It's really just c-decay all over again, which even creationists deny. ^talk 15:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

It's really just c-decay all over again, which even creationists deny. I see that you've taken to misrepresenting the positions of leading creationists. Typical. No substance, just slandering creationists. Creationists are the reason for science in the first place and it is only with God's predictable rules that we can even examine the universe. In short, science is an inherently Christian endeavor. I'll trust Dr. Faulkner's analysis over the self-serving rants of an evolutionist. Philip J. Rayment^talk 16:36, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

close but that sounds too much like andy, rather than PJR. I am enjoying my final night in Europe before flying out to NZ tomorrow. Going to eat some mushrooms and send my mate off to the red light district in downtown Amsterdam while this married man weirds out over a few beers. Aceⁱ⁹ 17:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Email me when you get a chance. I don't have some of your contact info and I've got a question. 18:31, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

No, really. C-decay at ASK was one of the first discussions I (along with Sid and Horace) had with PJR. Sid referenced Aardsma's ICR reference on it. ^talk 18:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

And it is amusing to think about. What color would chlorophyll be? Would plants even absorb the light any more? ^talk 18:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Unacceptable

Don't let it happen again! ^talk 01:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Am I missing the joke, or are three of the four editors who are even there actually RationalWiki users? --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 02:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

The goal is to have lim[t→August] numusers(ASK) = 1 ≡ PJR. And yes, they are one and the same. cf, [2] and all talk pages at ASK, for that matter. But don't edit! ^talk 02:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Gatsby, I know you don't want to get stabbed in the neck. But that's what's going to happen if you go over there and give Phillip someone to disagree with. Do you want to get stabbed in the neck? 03:14, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm just amazed at how pathetic it is that only Rayment's "enemies" are there, now. I have no desire to edit at that wiki, not even to fight with the guy. --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 03:18, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

it was a quick hit and run that seemed to get PJR blood moving. Hamster (talk) 07:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

ASK was always dominated by, um, us. He had at least one ally and a couple of bigot fundie friends. ^talk 12:16, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

What's up fat cunt

04:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC) HOLY FUCKING SHIT

04:28, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

What's up fat cunt

00:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

I don't know what else to say, given that I'm not very articulate. Bobafan (talk) 23:04, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

You could call me a fuck-knuckle? Aceⁱ⁹ 23:07, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I'd only do that if you were taking the piss.Bobafan (talk) 23:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

OK then. Aceⁱ⁹ 23:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Maratreanism

If you saved the page you haz the devoshun of I, Terror Trinka , the cat of the endtimes. mreeoooww ceiling cat will bless you too. Terror Trinka (talk) 23:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

SCREECH. TERROR TABA (talk) 23:37, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

say that's great. Aceⁱ⁹ 10:08, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Worst - and one of the quickest - deletions ever.--Bob^{"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that."} 18:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Regardless of the merits, it was premature. You can edit war with one of our vilest and most tendentious editors if you want. He'll slither out of the woodwork to defend his decision to enforce a non-existent consensus. 19:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

I lack the technical knowhow to revert it, but I definitely think that vote was ended prematurely. Many of the people active on the site who voted against deletion last time did not vote this time. If there is a consensus to delete then fair enough, but there wasn't evidence of one yet and pushing it through before there is one only creates resentment. Damo^Hi 22:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

OK, I'll do it. Aceⁱ⁹ 07:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

How can we get rid of Maratreanism????? It's very seldom that such comedy walks itself onto RationalWiki (or anywhere else on the internet, to be honest). I would argue, it was the greatest comedy spoon-fed to us since CUR's felidae nonsense! Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 10:50, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Fatherhood

Congrats. You're a lucky bastard all round. Mrs. K could never have kids but we never fretted over the fact. Генгис^{RationalWiki GOLD member} 13:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Congrats fatty! You'll make a rotten dad to that little hellion, but Mrs. McWicked is even more stuck with you than before. When did your third world healthcare system say it was ok to start tranquilizing your kidlet so you can go drinking again? But serious, congratulations. I'm really happy for you. I suppose I should just go look at Facebook. 14:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

An appropriate response

16:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC)