There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Cjameshuff
- David Gerard (talk) 19:11, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Satz and capacitors[edit]
Apparently, that's only true for "normal" capacitors. Though I see that the distinction between types only seemed to be made clear after the BAUT thread was done and dusted. Still, I haven't seen any results forthcoming. narchist 23:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, he tried that argument with me via PM. Apparently film capacitors (as I used in earlier measurements) aren't "normal" either. With these two examples for comparison, I think we can safely rule out anything with two conductors separated by a dielectric as being described by Reciprocal Theory. Funny that nobody makes "normal" capacitors, though... Cjameshuff (talk) 01:37, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry....[edit]
...I was a little quick on the trigger - thought you were a spambot. Sorry about that. Acei9 20:32, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
pictures[edit]
So... what are the pictures for..?--Mikal Harass Follow 20:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC)