User talk:CopernicustheYounger

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, CopernicustheYounger!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Welcome and all that. Ace of Spades 21:54, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Captcha is driving me nuts.[edit]

Template:Help I am not a spam robot please overide the Captcha on this account, even if you think my contribs suck they are not trying to sell you Viagra or offshore investments! CopernicustheYounger (talk) 22:07, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

The Inquisition is on...[edit]

I notice that you have this interesting bit of data on your userpage...

I suspect this constitutes something of a badge of honor at RW...


00:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC) JPatt ( talk | contribs) blocked CopernicustheYounger ( talk | contribs ) with the expiry time of 1 month (account creation disabled) (Member of vandal/parodist site

So basically the "Conservatives" stalk these pages. How odd, you'd think they'd have something better to do than deny common sense and science.

Is there someway to build enough cred on this wiki to not be captcha'd on every post?CopernicustheYounger (talk) 00:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Conservapedians regularly patrol RW. Ken in particular and Rob Smith is a User here. Oh yeah, you should have any problem with captcha now. See here. Ace of Spades 00:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Oh, and that message on Noises's userpage is the result of a block generator. One of our many toys. Like this Quote generator...Ace of Spades 00:30, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Well the assquote generator may be the cause of legal liability or of antagonism which is not useful or necessary. I don't see the point of it.NOTE: Ran it again on preview and did laugh my ass off. Buuut...OK, ran another preview, really laughing hysterically, my cat thinks i got into some really good catnip...but shouldn't there be a disclaimer??CopernicustheYounger (talk) 00:37, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Why a disclaimer? Ace of Spades 00:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
ASclaff didn't write it so he could get mad and sue or say we are childish idiots or whatever. He will probably say that anyway, I admit that, but he would maybe get more cred than he deserves. Also, he might retaliate with fake posts by others. But yeah it is funny as hell...I like your use of rap vids must scare the be-jeezus out of 'em...we got some homeys backing us...I take it those blocks are people at Conservepdia, or here, who won't take messages here and block account creation at Conservepdia. What would they do if Jesus wants to register an account there???WWJB?CopernicustheYounger (talk) 00:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
If Andy didn't want us laughing at him he shouldn't say such funny things. Ace of Spades 00:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Ha ha. Well, IDGAF, really. So are these blocks then also spoof?CopernicustheYounger (talk) 00:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Yup. Ace of Spades 00:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I haven't laughed so hard since I used to smoke lotsa weed. But seriously, you are waking me up to what assholes there are behind the pulpit these days. Red telephone. But I agree with the right on some things, like I certainly don't wnat them and only them to control all weapons (if they cop our guns only cops will have guns) and also, lots of the left really sucks. But you knew this already.CopernicustheYounger (talk) 00:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Glad you like our "toys". You aren't the first person to get burned by the random block generator. Aboriginal Noise Oh, what a lovely tea party! 14:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


The thing is that is exactly how those people do act. It does seem real. !CopernicustheYounger (talk) 02:25, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Collegaue re Abraham[edit]

Egads I have been ....reverted (oh the agonies of the wicked wiki world)...but once the initial horror wore off I looked into the face of Truth and realized that it is not "Paradoxical" that the deranged Abraham is revered as a Holy Saint by the bible-humpers...given the past two or three thousand years of witch burnings and crusades and jihads, it is simply Par for the Course!CopernicustheYounger (talk) 20:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality not quantity.[edit]

Dude, slow down. Proofread your edits. Don't insert random red links. Thanks. P-FosterCan't we talk about this, baby?Moderator 21:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

What makes you think they are "random"? One article had probably a few more than the traffic will bare. But how many readers know about those massacres? Maybe it's worth the gas. Aside from that one article, what is there not to love about these posts?CopernicustheYounger (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
The ones in Karl Marx were to a misspelling of Douglas Macarthur's name (you had an extra "s") and a pretty obscure event in Korean War history. Not really germane to what we do, best off as a sub-section in an existing article. ~~