User talk:Cracker/archive1

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
guess who pwned you?


PUTIN in Space!!!!
THE ALIENS ARE WATCHING YOU!!!

http://www.shaktitechnology.com/

forum[edit]

try logging in now. tmtoulouse annoy 16:50, 15 September 2007 (EDT)

OKay thanks, I'm in. CЯacke® 16:57, 15 September 2007 (EDT)

Ah, I was wondering who it was that creates articles without writing complete first sentences using the title in bold! Bad cracker, no cheese! humanbe in 18:41, 15 September 2007 (EDT)

OK...se how many articles I create now. CЯacke® 18:47, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
Hehe. humanbe in 19:01, 15 September 2007 (EDT)

Stop fucking with the fresh meat New Members![edit]

As above. CЯacke®

heh, you said, "Members". CЯacke®
That's it, you're blocked! CЯacke®

So Cracker always quotes himself? --Graham 17:55, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

Who better? Besides who, else will? CЯacke® 18:40, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
heh, graham crackers, hehe humanbe in 18:44, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
Which were invented to curb touching one's self. CЯacke® 18:49, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

Schlafly Shuffle[edit]

I wrote that the physical motion closely resembled a cross between the Charleston and the pee-pee dance. I thought that was pretty funny. Oh well.--Edgerunner76 14:15, 20 September 2007 (EDT)

Yeah, I had trouble visualizing that and it was a stub. And no, it wasn't funny. You could try resurrecting it by incorporating it into one of the existing Schlafly avoidance articles perhaps?CЯacke® 14:22, 20 September 2007 (EDT)

Pic[edit]

Love the pic. Haven't seen it in a while.--Bob's your uncle 15:29, 24 September 2007 (EDT)

We have Smyth to thank.CЯacke® 15:36, 24 September 2007 (EDT)

Thank you[edit]

You won't regret this. Sam Wellington the fourth 19:49, 25 September 2007 (EDT)

I won't or you will. CЯacke® 19:50, 25 September 2007 (EDT)

Your talk page[edit]

Is fuckin' freaky... I'm scared humanbe in 01:43, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

Just tidying up a bit for halloween. CЯacke®

Re:Archives[edit]

Very zealous, our ken is. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

Aliens?[edit]

maybe?The AlienDon't tase me, Bro!!! 00:01, 1 October 2007 (EDT)

Jeb Berkeley[edit]

Whom you blocked earlier has two red links on his user page User:Jeb Berkeley. As neither link is likely to warrant an article on RW, I would like to remove the linkage as part of Project Whitewash, but I need to tread carefully for obvious reasons. Any suggestions would be welcome.:--Remarcsd 05:03, 1 October 2007 (EDT)

laziness[edit]

I would say I was so lazy that I won't even respond to further show my laziness, but that would defeat the purpose, on account of me responding. Although, I'm still lazy enough to not update my userpage, or retell tales that have already been told, as thou art no doubt aware. Disregarding past stuff, laziness is the way to go, yea! You don't have to do very much. It's great indeed! YB indeed! 12:47, 29 October 2007 (EDT)

Eh, I'm actually worried that my labors would increase the entropy of the universe to such a degree that I, (by my actions, [i.e. work], and continual labors ) would cause the death of the universe and it's cold, dead, lifeless existence would be all my fault. That's my story, I'm stickin' to it. CЯacke®
That's the spirit! We all should do our part to stop entropy: Nothing! YB indeed! 15:52, 29 October 2007 (EDT)

message[edit]

Hi, you asked "How long would you like your initial block to be?" on my talk page. I don't think I understand. --Justinfr 11:55, 4 November 2007 (EST)

Er, consider it a hazing ritual, we block people for interesting time periods (such as pi seconds) instead of making them run naked and chug vodka. tmtoulouse annoy 11:58, 4 November 2007 (EST)
Roger. I'm catching on quickly.--Justinfr 12:11, 4 November 2007 (EST)
Are you having an internal dispute with yourself?--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 18:19, 5 November 2007 (EST)
NO! CЯacke®
YES, we ARE! CЯacke®
No, we are most certainly not!!CЯacke®
I don't mean to contradict you in front of the children...but yes we ARE!CЯacke®
Excuse me, can we get a straight jacket in here? Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 19:47, 5 November 2007 (EST)
Get two....just in case. 19:49, 5 November 2007 --PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it

Your meds[edit]

Take 2 more of the little green pills. Now.162.82.215.199 16:02, 7 November 2007 (EST)

GodBlessAmerica[edit]

If you'd like to have a little fun, I'd suggest posting a counter essay from here I thought it'd be a amusing way to expose the pathetic lunacy of GodBlessAmerica - that is, trying to make a point by copy-pasting an Uncyclopedia article. Or if you don't care quite that much, you could just straightforwardly mock him for doing so. Why don't I do it myself, you might ask? Um, because I want sleep. Uchiha 01:43, 11 November 2007 (EST)

Now he's grabbing from here... *massive rolling of eyes* Uchiha
Ranters are seldom original. CЯacke®
I corrected one of the UC links above. humanUser talk:Human 15:31, 12 November 2007 (EST)
Just remember, Liberal ranters are just as unoriginal as conservative ones. GodBlessAmerica 18:12, 14 November 2007 (EST)
I do not recall qualifying the political slant in my description. Ranters are ranters, no-one really pays attention to them, unless they're loaded for bear, or trying to hijack one's wiki. CЯacke®

User talk:Human/chats repair[edit]

I fixed User talk:Human/chats so it parses properly. Thanks! Maybe you'd want to copy it to your user space? humanUser talk:Human 15:28, 12 November 2007 (EST)

I'll probably pass, I was happy to read it in the diffs.CЯacke®
Think I should now delete again, now that we have a "working version" stored in the history? humanUser talk:Human 15:45, 12 November 2007 (EST)
Sounds right. CЯacke®

Man it dies around here after 9:0opm Edt Bohdan 00:38, 14 November 2007 (EST)

You should see it during daytime GMT. Practically a mausoleum. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 18:40, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Your name[edit]

Hi, i have a genrel question; where does your name come from? Elassint Throw things at me

Puttin' on the Ritz! humanUser talk:Human 17:45, 14 November 2007 (EST)
See mine user page. User:Cracker I'm a security expert (of sorts) I get in where most people cannot. CЯacke®

Rasist[edit]

So u can use the word Cracker but i cant use the word nigger? 67.159.30.9 18:05, 14 November 2007 (EST)

That is correct. humanUser talk:Human 18:59, 14 November 2007 (EST)
His usage is ambiguous (and possibly self-deprecating). Yours in not. Hav a nice day.Researcher 19:03, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Cracker comes from the Pennsilfaanisch-Deitsch word "Kracken-in-hosen"19:18, 14 November 2007 (EST)

As above: I am (was, I are retired for the most part), a SAFE-cracker. Unless I go off half-cocked (or worse full cocked) then I am a dangerous cracker. CЯacke®
Cracker.JPG

Asdfgh.jpg. This picture is real. Bohdan 20:09, 14 November 2007 (EST)


I are pwned. :-( CЯacke®

My password is password?[edit]

You mean you wernet able to take control of the account? My password is ginger 16:45, 16 November 2007 (EST)

Please for to speak English, did you mean "weren't"? I could and did but what's the point? CЯacke® 16:47, 16 November 2007 (EST)


PM[edit]

I've sent you a pm on the forum :-) --Bobbing up 17:04, 16 November 2007 (EST)

Colored goat intestines![edit]

ROTFLMAO!!! humanUser talk:Human 23:09, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Just to clarify, the intestines were colored...not the goats used to make them. Despite #16 (above) I ain't no "rasist". CЯacke® 23:15, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Hello?[edit]

Hello? hello? ello? ello? lo? Warren Terra 00:47, 9 December 2007 (EST)

?[edit]

  • Did you archive my stuff in your archive space? That's... so kind. Bohdan 20:30, 13 December 2007 (EST)
Just until your...stuff founded a home. CЯacke®
Thank... you. But its not really necessary. It is always... saved in the history. But thanks... anyway. I appreciate it. ... Bohdan 20:38, 13 December 2007 (EST)
Yeah, but Trent you could just wipe it anytime you didn't want it around anyways. CЯacke®

Returned??[edit]

Lol I dont think so this is my first time on rationalwiki. Realist2 11:12, 14 December 2007 (EST)

Sir, yes, sir![edit]

Red Impact size +5 locked and loaded, sir! --Robledo 23:01, 14 December 2007 (EST)

On matters of absolute importance and singular relation.[edit]

so i herd u liek mudkips?Substitution 14:55, 20 December 2007 (EST)

ai are alargik seefoodz :-( ai eated cookiz doh. CЯacke®

Bloggy[edit]

So, I'm spamming people with invites to RationalBlogs, and thought I might as well give you one. --Linus(plot evil tech) 16:48, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Um...okay...Where is it?

Addtions 2008[edit]


Thanks for updating "recent changes text"! Gotta go outside in an hour and, er, worship the sunfulness. Shit, I keep meaning to build a stonehenge here so I can keep track! I feel like it's such a copout not to figure it out on my own! humanUser talk:Human 23:54, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Nice balloons, by the way!

[edit]

Okay this a-here page will house the 22nd's on-running celebration of Yule/solstice/Xmas party. By the way, XMAS is pronounced cricksmas. CЯacke® 10:12, 22 December 2007 (EST)

What? Party here? We didn't know! You gotta send out invitations, man! ГдлессЛиберал 11:11, 22 December 2007 (EST)
Ctree 5a.gif
Well, I've brought a tree who's got the booze? Jollyfish.gifGenghis Marauding 11:19, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Sorry strictly BYOB, I'ma cheap bast'ad. CЯacke®

OK here's some Bolly Jollyfish.gifGenghis Marauding 12:21, 22 December 2007 (EST)

100px100px

35px 35px 35px 35px 35px 35px 35px 35px 35px 35px 35px 35px
And some Guinness! All we need now are the RW strumpets. Jollyfish.gifGenghis Marauding 15:14, 22 December 2007 (EST)

File:Long-eared jerboax.jpg
We loves X-mas parties!!!!

Music[edit]

File:Pianoxbar01a.gif
No Requests!!!!






Get Wet[edit]

File:Scotchx.jpg
This iz wot I thawt u ment!
File:Mudkipx.png
pools r good four mudkips!



Swimming in December? Fascinating. --Linus(plot evil tech) 12:36, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Unseen in the photo is the dome, besides it's summer in OZ.CЯacke® 12:39, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Kissing Station[edit]

File:Poison01ax.jpg
Your mononucleosis Headquarters!

I'll be hanging out here. ГдлессЛиберал 11:51, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Careful, I have a lot of gay friends coming to this a-here sware-ay. CЯacke®
This'll compliment my GBS quite well! NorsemanWassail! 11:55, 22 December 2007 (EST)


FOOD[edit]

200px Anybody bringed a can opener? CЯacke®

How about some of that vegamite stuff?


Party!![edit]

Goat!!!



And SNOW. It's all I've got :( No lemons, at least! humanUser talk:Human 23:08, 22 December 2007 (EST)

I's KY boy[edit]

I brings bourbon, and bourbon balls. Enjoy. Researcher 01:34, 23 December 2007 (EST)

I can't stand the stuff (any more), but I mightily admire the bourbon mythologies! humanUser talk:Human 01:45, 23 December 2007 (EST)
My grandpa was eating bourbon balls this morning! He can bring us some more when we run out. ГдлессЛиберал 16:44, 23 December 2007 (EST)

HA![edit]

I see you're still bitter about your loss in the Doughnut war! --Ζωροάστρης 20:33, 26 December 2007 (EST)

Tis not bitterness but a bittersweet victory, knowing that heretics enjoying holeless "doughnuts" will roast in the fiery pits (Krispy Kreme oil heaters), for all eternity, still refusing the Truth, that only the holely are of the one, true, phaith. CЯacke® 21:15, 26 December 2007 (EST)

Pakistan...[edit]

"Relationships have remained high..." Holy fuck, did I write that?!?!? Jesus. No more wikiediting before coffee. Thanks for catching that...PFoster 11:44, 30 December 2007 (EST)

two minutes?[edit]

You're getting soft. user talk:Bohdan 20:55, 31 December 2007 (EST)

Blocking TK[edit]

Excuse me? What in your mind is a "real reason", if not outright insults like the one I quoted? I'm reinstating the block until I get a straight answer on that. --Kels 14:08, 6 January 2008 (EST)

  • The comment that earned the block didn't really rise to "intimidating behavior" IMO.
  • "old, bitter drunk" is Human anyway. Well, at least "old" and "drunk" are; bitter's a rather subjective term and given the nature of the exchange, mild.
  • In blocking you prove TK's point about the site not growing because the old guard tends to circle the wagons a bit too quickly and a bit too often.
  • The exchange started with other's taking shots at TK's expense: okay, they were mild jabs but he shouldn't be picked on...He should be allowed leeway to defend himself.
  • No-one found it offensive, but you, apparently.
That said, I will not undo your block. I leave it to your own conscious.
CЯacke® 14:27, 6 January 2008 (EST)
I would ban pretty much anyone for that crack, as well as the whole paragraph it was part of. I wasn't singling TK out on that, and he'd already been warned about the Fibbonacci blocks in days, or I would have gone with only an hour or so. Also, since nobody else commented on it, I'm a bit mystified at your comment that no-one found it offensive. --Kels 14:31, 6 January 2008 (EST)
Let's then ask Huw when he gets here. He's the "offended party" should he be so inclined. CЯacke® 14:38, 6 January 2008 (EST)
Mmmm. I'm not sure that's the right solution. He may well say "So what." But is that the issue? Should the test for abusive behavior be whether the person insulted complains, or should it be whether it appears insulting to third parties? In other words should every person subjected to cyber-bullying be obliged to post a formal complaint against his persecutor or should admins be expected to step in? While Human is well able to take care of himself, we should also remember that we are setting a bit of a precedent here.--Bobbing up 14:46, 6 January 2008 (EST)
Good natured snarks or offensive behavior have to be judged in the light of the participants and the follow-up in the exchange. Had the comments come from Bohdan, (though not his style), would we be having this discussion? Ah well, volleyball calls me. CЯacke®
That is the question indeed. I feel that the answer is no, as certain users seem to have an extreme grudge against Tk (Not saying he's always in the free and clear, he has gone after other users to, but his comments sure do seem to draw much more fire than others). Pinto's5150 Talk 15:06, 6 January 2008 (EST)
Pinto - I tried to say a similar thing but reset my wireless router by mistake. Working on two PCs at once :( Jollyfish.gifGenghis Marauding 15:52, 6 January 2008 (EST)

I have one more bit of research to do before commenting here. humanUser talk:Human 21:09, 6 January 2008 (EST)

Comment from human[edit]

First a general comment. In the past, we have tested personal attacks by the standard of whether someone feels attacked or not. I remember, for instance, blocking HG once for what I perceived to be an insult. The receiver of the "insult", however, said he didn't mind HG's comment - so there was no foul and we unblocked HG forthwith. It does make sense to do this - for instance, an "in joke" between two editors may look nasty from the outside, but be harmless to those involved (as long as they aren't insulting someone else).

Second, the issue at hand. Last night after getting off the phone with a friend 'round 1:30 AM (2:30 contrib list time) I scanned my watchlist quickly, and made two edits. This first was to talk:main, and is the section in question, and the second was in mucketykipeze on the bible talk page, and was utterly harmless. I investigated this in the off-chance I had provoked TK somewhere else on the wiki.

Here is what I added to a fairly random thread: "Me me me! Everyone forgot me!!!! Oh, never mind... humansub 01:37, 6 January 2008 (EST)". Fairly innocuous, I think, and not directed at anyone specifically.

TK replied "Yes, you old, bitter drunk...denigrate and diminish even nice conversations when they don't go the way you wish (down the toilet). It's apparent to everyone who comes here and has left.....odd you don't notice the RW retention rate, even for far-leftists, is dismal. That's because old, bitter snarks who have been made admins, want it like that. Otherwise your control over the place will go. And control is what you are all about. --TK/MyTalk 02:19, 6 January 2008 (EST)"

Points taken one by one...

  • I am old, sure. Not as old as TK, but older than "most" people on here.
  • I'm not "bitter".
  • While I may drink to excess quite regularly, and feature the scotch userbox on my user page, etc., there was nothing to indicate drunkenness (or bitterness?) in my silly little post.
    • Combining these three adjectives is something one should only do when they are close enough to the other person that they know it's a joke. And it had better be followed with j/k or a smiley, at least, if typed on the innertubes.
  • The next section is what I consider a personal attack, pure and simple. "denigrate and diminish even nice conversations when they don't go the way you wish (down the toilet)" has nothing to do with what I said, and implies a pattern on my part of denigrating and diminishing nice conversations - which is not substantiated.
  • The rant about control and user retention is irrelevant, although it's also pretty nasty in a general sort of way.

Trouble is, I didn't read any of this until this evening, about 18 hours later. Who knows what would have ensued if I had read it last night - I might have complained, I might not have cared, or, worse, I might have been rude in return (although I've not done that sort of thing for a while).

TK has a history of calling me some pretty offensive things, and I don't like it when he does. I never find it funny, and it bothers me when people post unsubstantiated personal attacks on me on the web.

Summary: I do consider the post an offensive personal attack. I leave it up to the rest of you to decide, however, whether the 2 day block should run its course or if "time served" is adequate. And to discuss whether Kels was rash or justified in the block. humanUser talk:Human 21:28, 6 January 2008 (EST)

The block was a good one, IMO, I originally reverted it based on my (considerable) gut telling me that too much time had elapsed from the time of the comment to the block. It looked vindictive. My gut has been wrong before and perhaps I shoulda stayed out of it (or at least talked about it before reverting the block). The comment on the unblock was "Please have a real reason for blocking" and seems now, in retrospect, a tad too terse, (or even wrong). As always, we should strive to "play nice" with other people's children. CЯacke® 21:55, 6 January 2008 (EST)
Do we know for a fact that TK was referring to Human? It wasn't indented in as far as Human's comment (IIRC). I thought at first he was referring to Susan (the two aren't the best of friends, she had just made a comment about him previously). Then again, I'm notorious at misunderstanding people. ThunderkatzHo! 22:17, 6 January 2008 (EST)
So looking back, it probably was about Human (no one else had commented close to that). However, in light of the fact that nothing TK said in that section was coherent or on topic, I vote we forgive him for being drunk and unblock him. ThunderkatzHo! 22:21, 6 January 2008 (EST)
What makes you think TK was drunk? I rather doubt it, but if he was, why would that mean we should unblock him?--Bobbing up 05:49, 7 January 2008 (EST)

The problem is Human, you are being too "rational", and TK is "irrational". So to give his comments the same respect as you would those of someone who is not a psychopath, would be a mistake. TK has a habit of repeating things that people have said to him. So when he calls you "old" or "bitter" or a "drunk" this is because someone has said this to him. If he complains that you "denigrate and diminish even nice conversations" it's a sure bet that someone has accused him of doing this in the past. Ditto his "control is what you are all about" remark. It's not really about you, you are just a convenient target for the "hate" that he so often accuses others of having. You must understand the madness behind the man... — Unsigned, by: 193.200.150.23 / talk / contribs

I guess I follow your logic? Well, yes, he is a sociopath, etc., etc. I get the picture. Compare our contribs to the wiki if you're really bored. humanUser talk:Human 06:11, 7 January 2008 (EST)

So, according to "Human" is is acceptable to call someone a sociopath, but not a bitter, old drunk, lol. Typical of the power elite here, allowed to get away with whatever they want to, but demanding they be allowed to silence and harass whoever they don't like. Very liberal! Very rational! He sounds like Andy, inviting others to "make substantial edits of a quality kind", in his statement above, knowing full well, if one investigates my contribs, one finds lots of "missing" wiki glitches, deleted material, and 95% of all my edits here have been reversed, mainly out of spite. The elites here, they only fool themselves.....anything to hold on to power. We understand them. --TK/MyTalkRemember: Old English Prunes Are Usually Bitter 18:12, 8 January 2008 (EST)

I have no idea why I didn't get blocked (yet) for that. Sometimes the gears of justice creak slowly...? humanUser talk:Human 18:35, 8 January 2008 (EST)
No, they work as you make them. All the better for me to make my points, is all. Neither was your fellow Cabalist Kels blocked for her attack on me in WIGO. Nor were you or AmesG blocked, for doing the same on my talk page last month. Only those who admins dislike are ever blocked, except for your beard and shining example of "tolerance" Bohdan. Like I said earlier, even my recent block, formulated on AmesG's bogus pronouncement, based upon two reversed and against the rules blocks by you and AmesG, was crap. It only makes people stay away, as you members of the Cabal show how intolerant you are, and use comparisons to fascist CP to show you are more tolerant. Being a bit more tolerant than a Nazi, isn't a particularly good thing in most people's opinion, Human. Let's see you and AmesG give up, completely, your power, forever, to see how much equality you can take, huh? --TK/MyTalkRemember: Old English Prunes Are Usually Bitter 18:49, 8 January 2008 (EST)
Dude.... whilst personality disorders aren't generally responsive to treatment, at least beg your doctor for some fucking Valium or something. Two of them and a pint, and you might be halfway bearable. --Robledo 19:02, 8 January 2008 (EST)

How about you get the same comments I do, the same edit reversals just out of spite I get, the same hate emails these tolerant people send me? Always easy to put others down, Robledo, especially when you don't ever see both sides, or even ask. But that's your right. At least I wouldn't block you for your opinion. --TK/MyTalkRemember: Old English Prunes Are Usually Bitter 19:17, 8 January 2008 (EST)

God I'm half an inch away from blocking everyone who has posted on this page, myself included. Pinto's5150 Talk 19:37, 8 January 2008 (EST) I suppose asking the lot of you for some mature treatment of each other would be a stretch? Pinto's5150 Talk
"A bureaucrat is the true voice of the people in a Wiki project. He or she is supported and recognized by all as a fair administrator of the rules, who does not spark controversy, but instead mollifies it, bringing users together rather than splitting them apart...." -AmesG10:46, 26 April 2007 (EDT)[1]
--TK/MyTalkRemember: Old English Prunes Are Usually Bitter 19:53, 8 January 2008 (EST)

privacy question[edit]

I'm working on this:

http://www.rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Editors'_Report_Card_2007#Participants_on_RW_1.0

And you edited CP as Cracker and as your real name. To follow the format I've used, I would be "outing" your real name. If that's ok with you I'll do it, other wise I'll just put that username on its own row.

Thanks! humanUser talk:Human 01:01, 7 January 2008 (EST)

Yes, that's fine with me.
I was also:

.CЯacke® 13:40, 7 January 2008 (EST) [[cp:user:

OK, I'll combine them (your two main accounts) later today. Those others are all latterday socks, aren't they? As opposed to RW1-era CP users? I suppose I can look up their records myself... humanUser talk:Human 16:02, 7 January 2008 (EST)
Right, in the RW era I only had Cracker and Rob Pommer, those listed above are post-purge. CЯacke®

It is possible that I, also, wore some socks, but I cannot remember which were the most prolific. --PalMD-Mmmm...Brains! 16:11, 7 January 2008 (EST)

You foole![edit]

Negative time blocks don't work! Bwahahahaha! CЯacke® 00:40, 10 January 2008 (EST)

Rant thingie[edit]

How come it got moved back to CS?* (*community standards, for those to tired to type it)

I get dizzy keepin' track!!! I thought it wuz here while I replied to TK's latest paranoid, divisory crap.

Oh, wait, maybe I know why you don't want it on your user space now... humanUser talk:Human 02:50, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Are you leaving?[edit]

I'd probably cry.-αmεσ (tailor) 14:56, 16 January 2008 (EST)

I almost did. --Linus(plot evil tech) 15:53, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Me too. I'll miss you. humanUser talk:Human 16:07, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Where did thIs come from? Cracker's not going surely - heartbreak :-( SusanPurrrrrrr 16:33, 16 January 2008 (EST)

See the forums… you'll notice a change if you look carefully enough. It's there. --Linus(plot evil tech) 16:41, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Also see the block log (too lazy to provide a link) Oh, ok, here humanUser talk:Human 19:41, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Don't do it, fella. Keegan's back in charge of the Toon - you'll be pissing on an otherwise beautiful day. --Robledo 16:56, 16 January 2008 (EST)

I don't understand, Cracker seemed to be an unproductive wise-ass, that only posted to WIGO and various talk pages to add his touch of (what I'd guess could be called) humor. Maybe I just don't know the backstory. I don't know. Can I have his sysopship? Warren Terra 19:17, 16 January 2008 (EST)
No, you can have a nice block though, if you're still interested...... Pinto's5150 Talk 19:18, 16 January 2008 (EST)
"Requesting" sysopship is generally considered a disqualification for demotion here. So sorry. humanUser talk:Human 19:41, 16 January 2008 (EST)
But I want to be pro-...ah, I see. I guess it's too late to say I wouldn't touch a sysopship here with a giant from Warsaw? Warren Terra 22:14, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Was it something user:Human said? user talk:Bohdan 22:23, 18 January 2008 (EST)

Post retirement bullshit[edit]

Banana.gifBanana.gifBanana.gifBanana.gifBanana.gif


IRC[edit]

pikture gone

OK, I see the "@chanserv" thing. I wonder how to activate that? humanUser talk:Human 16:15, 9 February 2008 (EST)


Why does he get to post here, but you revert everyone else?humanUser talk:Human 00:47, 29 February 2008 (EST)


Why does he get to post here, but you revert everyone else? humanUser talk:Human 00:52, 29 February 2008 (EST)


Why does he get to post here, but you revert everyone else? humanUser talk:Human 00:57, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Hey[edit]

Thanks for the block, hehe. Maybe I should stop making sense :) --MrMetalFLower 15:36, 7 March 2008 (EST)

You can make all the sense you want since you're not likely to be procreating anytime soon. CЯacke® 15:38, 7 March 2008 (EST)
procreating? as in the reproductive sense? :P excuse my momentary lapse of understanding. --MrMetalFLower 15:40, 7 March 2008 (EST)
Right since your progeny isn't going to be showing up to make sense FOR YOU, you'll obviously have to make your own sense. So...your sense was right, I was talking about "procreating" in the reproductive sense.15:43, 7 March 2008 (EST) CЯacke®
Either you're already informed of my sexual orientation or trying to take a shot at my manhood... good luck finding any vestiges of heterosexuality in me :P --MrMetalFLower 15:48, 7 March 2008 (EST)
I saw your note at the friendly hellhole. We tolerate fags fine here. We're marginally safe from queer-baiters and such. 16:01, 7 March 2008 (EST) CЯacke®

2011[edit]

added 09/12/2011[edit]

ow do i reset my password without an email having been set up? 70.72.49.178 (talk) 03:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

This question is above my paygrade, you'll have to talk to a tech person. I would imagine you'd have to tell them (via email) your username. I would also imagine that they would have to try to confirm you're actually the username you're claiming to be. They'd reset your PW and then you'd have to log in to change it.
This shouldn't take more than 3 weeks.
Maybe you should create a sock instead? C®ackeЯ

I have a GED[edit]

In fact, I scored in the 99th percentile (or whichever number implies I'm smarter than 99% of people taking the GED. Not much of an achievement, but it's all I got)--brxbrxbrxbrxbrxbrx-brxbrx

I'm sorry cracker please forgive me--"Shut up, Brx." 04:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Oh, you're forgiven, dearheart, but the above stays. kiss kiss C®ackeЯ

I dunno what the fuck that was all about...[edit]

...but I reinserted the dirty words in your most excellent WIGO. P-Foster (talk) 16:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

So I seen, thank you. The "unwritten" rule is (I guess) to keep RW looking betterer than CP by taking the high road. While I wouldn't want to see every WIGO in the gutter, sometimes it's best to go LOW to get in a good uppercut. 16:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC) C®ackeЯ

Moderator nomination[edit]

In case you're not already aware, somebody nominated you in the RationalWiki:Moderator elections. You need to accept the nomination in the next day or so if you want to appear on the ballot. WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 14:51, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

sayasaki the sysop[edit]

How do you mean "GP?"--"Shut up, Brx." 17:18, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

GP= General principle.
While his werk is excellent and whatnot, we're not a meritocracy...he should have to wait a few days (unless he's your sock) for to have the powerz, that everybody else had to wait fer. revert as ye see fit, I've made mine point. 17:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC) C®ackeЯ
OK. In a few days I'll do it again, will that be alright?--"Shut up, Brx." 17:41, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
being a re-noob here, what are the general principals of when you sysop?--Sun mowse.pngEn attendant Godot 17:58, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
A few days, he created the account on the 23rd and was sysoped the 25th...a bit too soon for mine taste. I'd also like to see at least fifty edits. but remember that as a mobocracy the way brx did it was fine...I just happened to disagree. 18:24, 25 June 2011 (UTC) C®ackeЯ
In this case edit count is trumped by the high substance of his edits. He wrote a great essay, does that count for nothing? Anyways, your call. You have seniority and I like you.--"Shut up, Brx." 19:42, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Tsk, this is silly. If you feel strongly that the user should oughta have a sysopship, give it to him; I won't revert. I've made my point but this needn't be a power struggle thing, do as ye see fit. If someone else, though silent, agrees with me, don't be surprised if the decision is revisited again. C®ackeЯ
Very well.--"Shut up, Brx." 01:31, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Wow, I only just discovered this. My apologies for creating such a stir. --Sasayaki (talk) 08:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Your message[edit]

Sorry, but it is hard to please three different people with conflicting wishes simultaniously. Please decide among yourselves, where you would like me to write and let me know. --I haven't chosen a username yet. (talk) 03:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Write wherever you damned well please. But if you post to a talk page please sign your posts. (The dereddeding of your userspage is just a pet peeve of mine, if you ax the comment I won't reinstate it). Maybe rent a thicker skin too, this is the internets. C®ackeЯ

I have a solution[edit]

I have a solution for a certain "problem" but cannot implement it without YOUR help. TeaPartyPlanner (talk) 17:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Christ, it's a joke![edit]

My block of human.

Obtain a life those whom will be OUTRAGED!!!! C®ackeЯ 19:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

2012 dump[edit]

You know what your individual assignments are.[edit]

I have begun. AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 23:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Jebus fucking Christ Ace, wait for till I uncomment out the Simon sez! We've been over this, albeit a long time ago, many times. C®ackeЯ
I think I have finished my individual assignment to quickly. How embarrassing. AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 23:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
I have emailed you. We need to time this better. AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 23:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, well, remember the post is the heads up, the authorization code is bullshit and nothing is done until the Simon sez is commented back In. C®ackeЯ

More one thing go I before[edit]

Please, for the love of goat (re)read this.

— Unsigned, by: cracker / talk / contribs

Huh?[edit]

What's going on, you make the fucking popcorn. AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 06:25, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank You[edit]

Thanks for telling me about the general guidelines around edits. I thought the editor made a mistake, so I wanted to correct it. Considering it's Conservapedia though, the poor grammar would actually help our case against it.

You can tell I'm new here, so forgive me if I haven't posted this reply correctly.

~99.240.246.163

Rob[edit]

To try to resolve this shit over Rob, I've opened a vote on the Chicken Coop and I wanted to make sure you were aware. Ochotonaprincepsnot a pokémon 1013 points 10:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

You can't be serious.[edit]

Please see my reply to your comment about an "ill-advised revert" on the talk page. Refugeetalk page 05:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

storage[edit]

Cause I'm THAT lazy C®ackeЯ . [Mark this page as patrolled]


Preview button[edit]

Yep ill try to learn that button. As I am going to edit right now.. fingers crossed.

If someone can help me with creating a new heading for Jose Escamilla on his page please do. Or if I give you the information can you do it for me because I am a tard at editing.

Jose's Latest Scam is Vortex Based Mathematics. His website for raising money is http://randysdonuts.neverendinglight.com/ Supersoylent has a video up on his youtube channel debunking it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAebKbnauG0&feature=plcp

Jose is also trying to raise 15k for a song about a dead girl.. He has removed the video after I kicked up a stink about it by writing to the official website.

Well please let me know as I do not want to piss people off with my poor editing techniques. — Unsigned, by: GreyMoon / talk / contribs

You can't put your comments on the talk page?[edit]

It would be much simpler if you did so. After all, if everybody inserted their commentary where they put their name, then the registration would be a mess to sort through. There's no reason to allude to your inebriation on the registration page, and doing so risks complicating the page's purpose.--"Shut up, Brx." 08:17, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

If you need a wiki that is tidy and well run then yes the comments should go onto the talk page. I do not wish for such an wiki. So fuck off. C®ackeЯ 19:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

I do apologise[edit]

But I am from the Isle of Man, which makes me sluggish of thought and lacking of sophisticated humour. 87.254.67.192 (talk) 07:06, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Xmas 2012[edit]

Christmas party! (or not) I ain't decorating this year[edit]

MERRY FUCKING XMAS!


Scotch.jpg

For all ye gay tunes