User talk:Fifth Horseman
Roger is not really all that important - and we all have nasty divorce stories these days. Not relevant. PFoster 14:23, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
- You mean like John Schlafly which is pure mockery of an individual that is not even involved in this, Roger has made him self a public figure because of his editing of CP and everything I said is in the public record. Fifth Horseman 14:24, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
- 1. Which passages in the JS article are mocking? 2. Roger has made an ass of himself on CP - stick to that. 3. So what if it's in the public record. Doesn't need to be on this wiki. PFoster 14:28, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
No one said
yet! :0 :) Lyra § talk 14:56, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
- Are you sort of like the fifth Beatle? ħuman 15:09, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Yea, and the fab four are really a bunch of pussies for the harbingers of the apocalypse. Fifth Horseman 20:58, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
- But The Clash! weren't! ħuman 21:32, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
- Yea, and the fab four are really a bunch of pussies for the harbingers of the apocalypse. Fifth Horseman 20:58, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
My thoughts[edit]
You seem to have no interest in this wiki beyond attacking Conservapedia sysops. You have not edited here in 10 months. Last time you edited was to vandalise the Eucharist article whilst there was a tense discussion about PZ Myers desecration of one, given how agitated our Catholic editors were at the time a very divisive and provocative move. But less than two days after I told DeanS - in a correspondence he never posted on his blog - he could edit his own article if he did not like its contents, here you are acting as though posting a picture of him is the single most important thing in the world. I know who you are and what this is about. - π 13:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have also reviewed your contributions and they are not encyclopedic. Please be more substantive with your edits or be elsewhere. Thanks and Godspeed. Neveruse513 13:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- "Neveruse513" (you're not credible, liberal), you may choose to disbelieve that Jesus rose from the dead, but there is nothing illogical about that Christian statement. I reread the beginning of your rant at the top of this section and you fail to mention what you find most inspiring about Columbus, such as his independent thinking, so clearly you're an atheistic believer in the fantasy of extraterrestrial life. You also clearly deny that chivalry was and is an ideal for all to strive for. It is very effective in reducing and eliminating friction, insults, hard-feelings, and accidents, not to mention that it helps resist liberal claptrap. It's simple logic: Carl Sagan was the public spokesmen for liberal scientists in the 1970s and 1980s, and an informal adviser to Jimmy Carter and other Democratic leaders. I urge you to accept logic with an open mind. Once you insist on illogical thought, there is no end to the false conclusions that you will draw. The Bible is the most logical book ever written. Learn something about it, please, for your own sake and the benefit of those around you. The truth shall set you free.--Andy Schlafly 05:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Sysop[edit]
You made sysop, use it wisely or POW! it'll be gone. Ace McWickedNecron99 04:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Here there be 'structions ħuman 05:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- You realize I am considered pretty much a troll around these parts right? Look up there, several people are damn sure they know who I am and what I am about...and none of it would be considered positive. Fifth Horseman (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, well, most of us are, and others are sure, and none of it and all that. Practice by blocking all 350 sysops on the site for 314 seconds or something. Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħuman 05:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah I only realised now you were a hideous troll. Not that it matters as power can easily be removed. Ace McWickedNecron99 06:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- My true power comes not from sysop rights. Fifth Horseman (talk) 19:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah I only realised now you were a hideous troll. Not that it matters as power can easily be removed. Ace McWickedNecron99 06:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, well, most of us are, and others are sure, and none of it and all that. Practice by blocking all 350 sysops on the site for 314 seconds or something. Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħuman 05:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
ZB[edit]
Not may people around RW knows the group's name. Why don't you just wave, I am a trolling CP sysop a little louder? 23:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmmm which sysop I wonder. Theres not many of them left. Ace McWickedNecron99 23:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I am a trolling CP sysop Fifth Horseman (talk) 16:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Or not.[edit]
. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 19:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Whatever. Now make ma sysop again god damn it. Now I said. Now. Fifth Horseman (talk) 00:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- You already wandalized the site once today. Bugger off. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2010 (UTC)