There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2020.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
User talk:Fifth Horseman
Roger is not really all that important - and we all have nasty divorce stories these days. Not relevant. PFoster 14:23, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
- You mean like John Schlafly which is pure mockery of an individual that is not even involved in this, Roger has made him self a public figure because of his editing of CP and everything I said is in the public record. Fifth Horseman 14:24, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
- 1. Which passages in the JS article are mocking? 2. Roger has made an ass of himself on CP - stick to that. 3. So what if it's in the public record. Doesn't need to be on this wiki. PFoster 14:28, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
yet! :0 :) Lyra § talk 14:56, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
No one said
- Are you sort of like the fifth Beatle? ħuman 15:09, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
You seem to have no interest in this wiki beyond attacking Conservapedia sysops. You have not edited here in 10 months. Last time you edited was to vandalise the Eucharist article whilst there was a tense discussion about PZ Myers desecration of one, given how agitated our Catholic editors were at the time a very divisive and provocative move. But less than two days after I told DeanS - in a correspondence he never posted on his blog - he could edit his own article if he did not like its contents, here you are acting as though posting a picture of him is the single most important thing in the world. I know who you are and what this is about. - π 13:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have also reviewed your contributions and they are not encyclopedic. Please be more substantive with your edits or be elsewhere. Thanks and Godspeed. Neveruse513 13:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- "Neveruse513", your posting is filled with gross misspellings, "I don't get it" type of statements, and a general link that shows nothing. I've managed to read your rants and you deny that Obama is a Muslim, which is undeniable, so there's a 95% chance you're favoring immorality. And you persist in denying the obvious truth that exhuming heretics and burning their bodies prevents liberal claptrap. You can whine all you want, but an intelligent designer is not constrained by an idiotic straight jacket of consistency. You seem to think that the truth depends on whether PNAS accepts it. It doesn't. Insistence on last wordism in violation of our rules, without contributing substance to this encyclopedia, could result in account blocking.--aschlafly 11:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Here there be 'structions ħuman 05:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- You realize I am considered pretty much a troll around these parts right? Look up there, several people are damn sure they know who I am and what I am about...and none of it would be considered positive. Fifth Horseman (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, well, most of us are, and others are sure, and none of it and all that. Practice by blocking all 350 sysops on the site for 314 seconds or something. Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħuman 05:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Not may people around RW knows the group's name. Why don't you just wave, I am a trolling CP sysop a little louder? 23:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmmm which sysop I wonder. Theres not many of them left. Ace McWickedNecron99 23:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I am a trolling CP sysop Fifth Horseman (talk) 16:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Whatever. Now make ma sysop again god damn it. Now I said. Now. Fifth Horseman (talk) 00:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)