User talk:Fox/Archive3

Article

Nice article, I hope it is for us although if you could post it over you know where.... - User $\scriptstyle h/2\hbar$ 07:37, 27 November 2008 (EST)

The incipit reminds me of... Ed Poor's essays: "Historian X.Y. asserts that...". :-D Editor at CP^{Oh, Finland! Why?} 07:43, 27 November 2008 (EST)

Actually that is not his essays that is how he thinks you write articles with a neutral point of view, instead of a single continuous objective prose they us at WP. - User $\scriptstyle h/2\hbar$ 07:58, 27 November 2008 (EST)

This article over at CP includes a lot about Rome based antisemitism. I wonder how it managed to survive so long? Special:Contributions/84.135.219.139

Your "Christian Antisemitism" article comes at a most opportune time. Exactly when we are discussing how to react to essays/articles for which there is no consensus. I have no particular axe to grind on the issue in question, but it will be interesting to see how it goes down. I hope that you don't find yourself floundering in the vandal bin.--Bob^{bing up} 15:44, 27 November 2008 (EST)

Message from the RationalWiki Ministry of Demotion and Personal Impediment

Dear Fox/Archive3, We regret to inform you that you have been demoted to the rank of sysop. You are requested to report to a bureaucrat, at your nearest possible convenience, to be assigned a mop and bucket for the purposes of cleaning up the mess around here. If you have any further questions please refer to the enclosed pamphlet So you are now a sysop. Your Sincerely, Sir Reginald Albert Humfildink-Hollingsworth the Third, Under-secretary of the Chief-secretary of the Personal-secretary of the Minister.

Well, you go away for a couple of days sightseeing on the Borean Tundra, and come back to find this on your talk page! What is the world coming to? I shall formulate a block policy of my very own now that I have become an Officer Orifice of this organisation and immediately spam obsequious and fawning praise to the site owner, Randy Zipfly, while intimidating all other contributors with thinly veiled threats. /removes tongue from cheek, heads to janitor's closet. Fox 04:51, 4 December 2008 (EST)

Sic transit ...

08:30, 7 December 2008 Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for User:Fox from Block, edit and Upload to (none) ‎ (inactivity and prior self-removal of user pages) (again) Fortinbrass 09:20, 7 December 2008 (EST)

IMO, it's for the better ;-) The whole procedure of unblocking yourself - posting a comment - re-blocking yourself reminded me of someone who places the cookie jar on top of his highest shelf, but doesn't stop to pinch a bit... --LArron 09:26, 7 December 2008 (EST)

Hi Foxy

_and marmite 05:18, 25 February 2009 (EST) (SusanG)

Morning, and back at ya =) Fox 05:48, 25 February 2009 (EST)

I think Ed's half (mommy's half) Jewish if I remember aright. _and marmite 06:33, 25 February 2009 (EST)

I see you've returned.

Since you went away reluctantly I left RationalWiki as well. Some of those who vandalize Conservapedia are just out and out cyberbullies in my opinion. I worked hard, tried to use my effort and intelligence to help build RationalWiki. The cyberbullies rewarded my work by targeting me. I'm now devoted to other wikis. I'm seeing what I can do for smaller wikis, notably Liberapedia as well as Atheism Wiki and Wikia Fiction. I could have done the same for RationalWiki. It was not to be. Take care that people here can't recognise your username elsewhere or they may follow you. Proxima Centauri 06:54, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Paranoia strikes. _and marmite 07:13, 25 February 2009 (EST)

...and welcome back

Hey, happy to see you here again, hope you stay around for awhile. :-) Refugee^{talk page} 11:43, 25 February 2009 (EST)

This should be good for a larf. You gonna get all liquored up again, play the victim and scream at us to call you on the phone? TheoryOfPractice 14:34, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Hehe I wouldn't need to get pissed to nonchalantly direct vitriol at a low-life, no-hope loser like you ;) It wouldn't even be sport. Fox 13:10, 27 February 2009 (EST)

What happened to your essay?

(Repeat subject line). It looked like it was coming along quite well (I didn't read it in great detail). If you want a point to your essay, looking at the multiple causes of antisemitism is pretty important. Christianity is hardly unique in its antisemitism but church doctrine and theology ways a huge contributing factor to its prevalence. Islamic antisemitism is the next obvious one, especially as it was a late nineteenth century imam or something who's teaching formed a lot of the basis of what would become Nazism. You could do a whole series on the types, causes and effects of antisemitism looking towards ways of combating it. It is a fairly unique form of racism in that it attacks one group for historical and religious reasons and is so widespread. Just my thoughts. - User $\pi$ 20:20, 20 March 2009 (EDT)

Contributions

Nice work. - User $\pi$ 18:52, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

/bows Why thankee. What I'd learned from CP was that I was the only sysop who could spot "British" humour, and several of my socks spent many weeks transcribing the works of Roger Melly into CP. The other thing I'd discovered was that CP sysops tended in the main to be dumbasses who were blinded by science: hence, several socks set to work ensuring that very plausible-sounding technicalities went unnoticed. It was a labour of love, my love for Teacake and Ed Moon. Enjoy trying to find them, Terry XD Fox 19:11, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

You here

I like having you here. You make RW a more interesting place, in the way it was initially idealized to be - a place where people could discuss, debate, disagree, without fear of the stupid banhammer we all saw at CP. So, as I said, it's nice having you around. You add an element RW (desperately) needs. ħuman 22:58, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

I second that observation, and I was interested in reading your take on the efficiency of birth control in England, even though I didn't have the time to research or put in my 0.02. I also enjoy having an agreeable person around with whom I disagree with, makes things more interesting, as Human said. Javasca₧ why me? 23:56, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

aSK account

I registered "Fox" on aSK with the vague idea of socking it up, but I've changed my mind, so if you want it, I can email you the username/password and you can have the account. -SockDrawer 03:06, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

I thought it was someone taking the piss so I blocked the name XD Although if you send me the password I think it might be less confusing if I use that name and abandon the other one, with a redirect. I think. (Sorry, opiate mode =/) Fox 08:37, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

Can you perhaps help improve this article on Israel? I'm fighting Palestinian attack. Proxima Centauri 15:04, 22 April 2009 (EDT)

Having just read it, it is mostly harmless, as these things go. Fox 01:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

OI! Fox!

Get out here buddy! Are you too scared to face me or are you busy with a Jinx in your Foxhole? Come on buddy, I am going to thrash you, then I'll be champion! Oh, what am I saying? Your too pussy to face me down. Ace McWicked^{Disco Jesus} 06:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Hm, I have no idea what you are wittering on about. Fox 00:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, er um, I was trying to call you out and challange you to a round of Jinx baiting. It was sometime ago and I gave into peer pressure. Never mind. Ace McWicked^{Disco Jesus} 02:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Just sayin'

You youtube link is borken. Just sayin'. ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ In Soviet Russia, the rhyming cowbell googles YOU! 23:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

No shit, sherlock. Fox (talk) 23:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

You leaving? - π 23:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

How can I leave when I was never really here? I was just a trophy. Fox (talk) 23:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

That is true, but I liked it when you came around a discussed the merits of shit in a can. Oh well, good luck with what ever you do. - π

Perhaps this place needed more discussions about shit in a can. Beyond shooting the fish in a barrel at cp it lacked legs. Oh well. Fox (talk) 00:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

RW is a childish hangout for adults who really should be doing something more productive with their lives. You didn't know that? MarcusCicero (talk) 08:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Ecce Homo Insults will get you everywhere, they are so convincing. ħuman 08:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

"Whitey looked at you the wrong way today or something?"

What the hell is wrong with you? RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 21:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

He forgot the password for Marcus Cicero. --Kels 21:12, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Or Fall down? Or TK? Or HofG? RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 21:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Wow! Did I miss something? Fox, What's up? Give me a shout if you need to vent something out. Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 21:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

I guess you did miss it. Someone wrote an essay basically saying that people who have sexual attractions to children aren't evil if they don't act on those attractions, which Fox (in a RobS moment) decided meant everyone at RW is in favor of fucking children. In fact, we do it all the time, evidently. DickTurpis 22:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Ah hahahha, is funny because I'm black..... Good one Fox.... I you totally got me... Nailed me completely... You know, I'm sure I have a few jokes for you... But you'll probably cry. SirChuckB^{Further bulletins as events warrant} 23:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey Fox -

"Why do Jews have big noses?"

"Because air is free!"

Bahahahahaha! Ace^McWicked 00:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

That's almost as bad as "what's the difference between a Jew and a pizza?" ^{d hominem} 00:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

I give up: What IS the difference? also, where do you go to school where history students do so little work? TheoryOfPractice 00:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Wait wait wait guys, totally over the line. I didn't list any for a specific reason... This isn't the way to make things better.... But now that you mention it Fox, I'm pretty sure there are some Klan Dragons hiding in my glove box... and I drive a White Van... Oh my god, my van is racist. SirChuckB^{Further bulletins as events warrant} 00:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Come on, chill the fuck out. A joke is a joke is a joke. Fox can handle. Ace^McWicked 00:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, 'Ace', if that is even your real name, he can't not today, evidently. I can't speak for Fox, but a) it wasn't incredibly funny (subjective, of course, but I didn't find it that funny), b) it was racist, even if ironically so, and c) has he not had enough choler for one day? --䷉䷻䷶䷈䷰䷒䷰䷈䷶䷈䷡^䷶䷀䷵䷥

Well you seem to have completely missed the fucking point. Fox can dish it out, you see what he called Toast? But can he take it, in jest? Ace^McWicked 00:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

I have compiled a dossier of 'fucking Nazi', 'shrivelled hag', etc. remarks. My point is that just because one person starts hurling that kind of abuse, it doesn't really help if everyone starts giving as good as they get, since things are just going to escalate, becoming worse and worse and actually realising some of the complaints made against the site. Also, this sort of vicarious 'I'll respond on X's behalf' behaviour's not exactly helpful either. --䷉䷻䷶䷈䷰䷒䷰䷈䷶䷈䷡^䷶䷀䷵䷥

So fucking what? If Fox escalates it it'll go to show what a dishonest prick he is (although I quite like Fox). He can make fun of others stereotypes but none are allowed to make fun of his without being a anti-semite. Who fucking cares. </drunkand unreasonable rant. Even more so due to it being 1:39pm Sunday>. Ace^McWicked 00:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

EC) He's an ex officer but no gentleman. I assume that he was operating under the influence of alcohol. Well he ought to take more water with it. I shall never communicate with him again. _& marmite^chat 00:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Chill the fuck out.............

.......and come back Fox. I always liked you and nearly called you that day you got really pissed and challenged RW to a fight. Ace^McWicked 23:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

"you bitter, sexless, shrivelled old hag" harsh words my man, give me your phone number so I can call you. Ace^McWicked 23:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

(EC) I agree. Cool off for a few days, and then, please, come back. I have often enjoyed your contributions here, and would hate to see you go. Punky ^{Your mental puke relief} 23:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Puts me in mind of the time TK called me a "dried up old cunt". Ah, nostalgia. --Kels 23:40, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Wait, I thought that was me he was referring to. ħuman 02:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

You're better than that

“”Retire my user page please, you intolerant cunts. Would do it myself but my opinions have been made non-existent on your hate site.

— Fox 19:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Your opinions remain on the talk page - there was a majority decision to keep that essay. As for removing sysop rights, I think after you said to Chuck "Whitey looked at you the wrong way today or something?" that's more than reasonable. Come on mate, you're better than that. SJ ^Debaser 14:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Alas

R.I.P.

POMPEY

A little below the belt I fear. You can mock a man's wife, his job, or his religion, but never mock his sports team.  Lily ^{Inspirate me.} 13:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

'twas intended as sympathy.   ^Contribs_Talk 13:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

(EC) Then you're forgiven. Who can ever forget that Portsmouth F.C. was once in the top 10 most viewed pages on Conservapedia?  Lily ^{Inspirate me.} 14:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm sure the club will not actually die. I look forward to watching the mighty 'Pool beat them when they visit Bloomfield Road next season. Jack Hughes (talk) 14:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I bet that's not the same mighty 'Pool that I first think of.  Lily ^{Inspirate me.} 14:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Forty miles(?) further north than you I'm a proud member of the Tangerine Army. Jack Hughes (talk) 14:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and can I echo Susan's commiserations. Relegation is never fun but the current circumstances detract from the beautiful game. Jack Hughes (talk) 14:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Ah, football now? My housemate supports Crystal Palace, and they're in administration. Now Portsmouth... in the words of Pete Townshend; who's next? SJ ^Debaser 14:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! FOOTBALL! *hides in a wardrobe* Professor Moriarty 14:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Have to agree, PH.   ^Contribs_Talk 14:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Fox

Fox is an angry, cowardly, humorless, bitter old man.The fact that he has his good days does nothing to change that. Rational Ed^think!

I always enjoyed it when Fox came around. Ace McAwesome 20:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Do you enjoy it when he liberally and gratuitously flings epithets like "Nazi" and "child molester" around? Rational Ed^think!

Secretly, you fucking loved it. Especially when it was a quiet night.

Don't remove talk page entries

mayo—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara  (talk • stalk) 02:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)