2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

User talk:Gill110951

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I would say welcome, but since you tried editing other people's essays...[edit]

New logo large.png Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Gill110951.

This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble.

We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives.

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you.

If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

Please don't let it happen again. --Goatspeed. Watch meCircularREmail2.gifasoningSteal my ideas 18:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

That's unnecessary for an honest good faith mistake. So:


New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Gill110951!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Knight CommanderIn ServiceTo HerGoatness 18:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

@Knight Commander Oh. I contemplated for a while which one to use, since the "unwelcome" one still implicitly assumes good faith. Feel free to trout me. --Goatspeed. Watch meCircularREmail2.gifasoningSteal my ideas 22:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)