Information icon.svg At All things in moderation, we are currently voting on restrictions on the use of LLMs (chatbots) in RationalWiki. Reminder: you need to have at least 75 edits and to have been registered for at least three months to be eligible to vote.

User talk:GirlConservative

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

You're no fun :p --transResident Transfanform! 00:01, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Who the hell are you? GirlConservative 00:02, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
I am the one who pwned your userpage—you know, the pwn you reverted as "shit"? --transResident Transfanform! 00:04, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Be Kind, Rewind[edit]

You have been blocked for 1 hour because of a personal attack against another user here. We block using the Fibonacci sequence so your next block will be 1 hour, followed by 2 hours if you continue. Welcome to rationalwiki! tmtoulouse pester 00:05, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

FWIW: I wasn't offended by that.CЯacke® 00:11, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

GirlConservative, your behaviour is awfully un-ladylike. We welcome all political viewpoints and ideologies here, but saying stuff like "uppity n***ers" will never be tolerated, ever. For the sake of debate, I hope you return after your one-hour block, but I will be watching, as will all other sysops, and stepping out of the (very wide, very vaguely defined) line will merit a block. --HHammer and Sickle text gold.svgjimachong 00:08, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
Well, if Cracker wasn't offended, we could consider an unblock, but next time it'll be 3 hours. Would that be OK, Cracker? Let her embarrass herself again? --HVista-epiphany.pngjimachong 00:17, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
Oh I have more faith in cracker than to think that little thing would get to him, mostly I am just ready for bed and figured I would be done with it for tonight. Feel free to unblock if you want. tmtoulouse pester 00:19, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
Good plan. Unblocked, but under surveillance (what's RW's stance on sysop utilization of the USAPATRIOT act?) --HVista-epiphany.pngjimachong 00:21, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
Authorized for only odd number blocks. tmtoulouse pester 00:23, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

and welcome...[edit]

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, GirlConservative!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

You realize your screen name is patronizing, right? Oh, no, wait, the second half explains that. Anyway, welcome, and I eagerly await your constructive contributions! humanbe in 00:43, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Whee! Homophobe and racist (and female?). Should be fun! Keep me informed 04:51, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
To be honest, I find it difficult to believe that this isn't a parody. I mean are there many people who still openly expose these views? Is this a typical (US) conservative position?--Bob_M (talk) 07:09, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
very funny. I'm not going to comment on why you would make such a stupid comment. Is this your sock? Do you think its funny? Bohdan 10:25, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
Definite parody. No one supports Lyndon LaRouche. ollïegrïnd 07:20, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
Hello Bohdan. No, it's not my sock. The question was asked in all innocence. I'm not from the USA - so what do I know? (My main exposure to US conservative views is via CP - so I may have a distorted perception.) But I must say that it certainly looked like a parody to me, so I wanted to know if this was a common conservative position. From your response can I take it that it isn't?--Bob_M (talk) 14:38, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
It's not a common one for them to acknowledge. The Republicans may cultivate the Bigot Vote, but they surely don't like to admit it. -- 16:03, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
Bob, no, its not the typical conservative position. And this isn't even a good parody. Bohdan 17:46, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Most certainly parody. --Linus(plot evil tech) 17:43, 9 August 2007 (CDT)