User talk:GirlConservative

You're no fun :p --_transResident Transfan^form! 00:01, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Who the hell are you? GirlConservative 00:02, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

I am the one who pwned your userpage—you know, the pwn you reverted as "shit"? --_transResident Transfan^form! 00:04, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Be Kind, Rewind

You have been blocked for 1 hour because of a personal attack against another user here. We block using the Fibonacci sequence so your next block will be 1 hour, followed by 2 hours if you continue. Welcome to rationalwiki! tmtoulouse ^nettle 00:05, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

FWIW: I wasn't offended by that.CЯacke® 00:11, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

GirlConservative, your behaviour is awfully un-ladylike. We welcome all political viewpoints and ideologies here, but saying stuff like "uppity n***ers" will never be tolerated, ever. For the sake of debate, I hope you return after your one-hour block, but I will be watching, as will all other sysops, and stepping out of the (very wide, very vaguely defined) line will merit a block. --Hjimachong 00:08, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Well, if Cracker wasn't offended, we could consider an unblock, but next time it'll be 3 hours. Would that be OK, Cracker? Let her embarrass herself again? --Hjimachong 00:17, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Oh I have more faith in cracker than to think that little thing would get to him, mostly I am just ready for bed and figured I would be done with it for tonight. Feel free to unblock if you want. tmtoulouse ^nettle 00:19, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Good plan. Unblocked, but under surveillance (what's RW's stance on sysop utilization of the USAPATRIOT act?) --Hjimachong 00:21, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Authorized for only odd number blocks. tmtoulouse ^nettle 00:23, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

and welcome...

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, GirlConservative! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

You realize your screen name is patronizing, right? Oh, no, wait, the second half explains that. Anyway, welcome, and I eagerly await your constructive contributions! human^{be in} 00:43, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Whee! Homophobe and racist (and female?). Should be fun! Keep ^{me informed} 04:51, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

To be honest, I find it difficult to believe that this isn't a parody. I mean are there many people who still openly expose these views? Is this a typical (US) conservative position?--Bob_M (talk) 07:09, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

very funny. I'm not going to comment on why you would make such a stupid comment. Is this your sock? Do you think its funny? Bohdan 10:25, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Definite parody. No one supports Lyndon LaRouche. ollïegrïnd 07:20, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Hello Bohdan. No, it's not my sock. The question was asked in all innocence. I'm not from the USA - so what do I know? (My main exposure to US conservative views is via CP - so I may have a distorted perception.) But I must say that it certainly looked like a parody to me, so I wanted to know if this was a common conservative position. From your response can I take it that it isn't?--Bob_M (talk) 14:38, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

It's not a common one for them to acknowledge. The Republicans may cultivate the Bigot Vote, but they surely don't like to admit it. --67.102.192.7 16:03, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Bob, no, its not the typical conservative position. And this isn't even a good parody. Bohdan 17:46, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Most certainly parody. --Linus^{(plot evil tech)} 17:43, 9 August 2007 (CDT)