User talk:Jenkins
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! You did a good job fighting Ed, and you'll win the war in the long run.-αmεσ (tailor) 14:40, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- For great justice! --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 14:43, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- Thanks a bunch to both of you. I have a lot of catching up to do, I think. I actually received a few invites (in various forms), and I did check this place out briefly when the first links popped up, but I always figured that I'd rather stay in the background and try to do some good and give Conservapedia a chance. When I saw the Main Page item, I overruled my "IT'S A TRAP! =O" instinct... and look where it got me. BAH.
- I hope I'll relax enough in the remaining time so I don't get infi-blocked for driving Ed's face into the ground or something. --Jenkins 14:46, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- Hello and welcome. Saw you were fighting for the monks on the talk page. Seems to be a bit worse than usual at the moment.--Bob's your uncle 14:52, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
Damn! For the first time I'm actually really cross! Well, at least I've given them a piece of my mind. Great work against Ed, though - he really is poisonous. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
- Now you're here, have you got a writing plan? Genghis Khant 15:40, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- *screams and runs in circles* --Jenkins 15:51, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- Now you're here, have you got a writing plan? Genghis Khant 15:40, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
Welcome to the jungle, boy! You're gonna die!
JK, although I'd pay a sysop to change the Cp welcome template to say that.--Offeep 17:50, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
Man, Ed is such a dick! I knew you couldn't last there; people with half a brain never do. Of course, you haven't been banned by common use of the word, but I've noticed users seldom come back after a week block. Do you have any intention to? Any substantial editing here will likely turn the block into infinite/5 years. That's what I was banned for, nothing specific, just generally being part of this site. Makes a mockery of their "we don't ban people for what they write elsewhere" rule, although all their rules are violated more often Andy's homeschool students (HA HA, I make pedophile joke! Funny, no?). Anyway have fun here. This is clearly where you belong. DickTurpis 09:31, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
Jesus H. Christ![edit]
Blashpemies aside, I can't believe it! I never welcomed you! I totally forgot!
Well... um, welcome to RationalWiki, then. I like how you're still sticking around at CP - "keep your friends close and your enemies closer" and all that. So... yeah. Feebas factor 03:04, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
Clinton and the Gay Bomb...[edit]
There, there, Jenkins. You tried your best. But didn't you know? RobS's "Idiot's Grin Stratagem" is nigh undefeatable. And this was a textbook example in action. 206.248.152.74 15:48, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
Sorry[edit]
Ed's a complete tool. UchihaKATON! 21:51, 26 January 2008 (EST)
- Nah, I really don't blame him, even though it's a pity that he apparently chose to ignore the points I made in the mail (see my user page here) and instead just interpreted it as me being aggressive.
- Of course, I mainly asked for the ban to make a point. And in the end, I got the ban, but the point was completely lost to them. Oh well. C'est la vie. (Beware: French part not spellchecked, and my French is terribly rusty to begin with.) --Jenkins 21:56, 26 January 2008 (EST)
- P.S. Belligerent email is awesome. UchihaKATON! 00:10, 27 January 2008 (EST)
- P.P.S. Ed's spelling of
belligerentbelligerint is even better. --BillOhannitygodvelocity. 00:54, 27 January 2008 (EST)- In order: Yes, he's a blind follower, thanks for the compliment, and yes, the spelling threw me off, too. --Jenkins 07:07, 27 January 2008 (EST)
- Ed is a horrible tool. He is not at all innocent. He cannot fall back on the Eichmann defense. He'll do anything for a taste of power. --PalMD-Did that sound a little harsh? 11:29, 27 January 2008 (EST)
- In order: Yes, he's a blind follower, thanks for the compliment, and yes, the spelling threw me off, too. --Jenkins 07:07, 27 January 2008 (EST)
- P.P.S. Ed's spelling of
- P.S. Belligerent email is awesome. UchihaKATON! 00:10, 27 January 2008 (EST)
What[edit]
Hey - I'm not really sure what your point is on the new WIGO thing - you do realized that Iduan only was talking about mainspace edits - right? (if you don't, I put the diff up)--Danielfolsom 11:15, 27 January 2008 (EST)
- I admit I missed the "unless talk space" bit. However, that's still him just making stuff up - talk space summaries should also contain some sort of hint (or just be left blank). There is no reason to exclude talk space from such a rule. To make matters worse, he even uses/used "re" (which I always assumed was short of "reply") when creating new talk sections. I admit that it's not the most epic Lulz (especially with his own disclaimer to exclude talk), but I guess we may as well leave it up? Not sure.
- As an aside, wow, you guys are fast! I came here when I saw that Iduan had poofed, only to find that two people here had already contributed to that WIGO item! --Jenkins 11:25, 27 January 2008 (EST)