User talk:KTDiputsho

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, KTDiputsho! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Hi! nice of you to join us. Pull up a sock goat and have a biccy.  ^Contribs_Talk 05:05, 21 April 2008 (EDT)

Userpage

Hey there and welcome!

Hate to say it, but you made two major mistakes (well, three, if we count "You joined CP in the hopes of actually improving it" :P):

1. You criticized TK. He has many friends among sysops (Ed Poor, Joaquín Martínez, HenryS, Geo.plrd, Karajou, and potentially others), so criticizing him is basically like slapping one of those sysops in the face. Which brings me to...
2. You pointed out that sysops likely did something bad, such as uploading images even when the site requires explicit permission. And pissing off a sysop (regardless of how valid your argument is - trust me, you're not the first guy to end up like this) is a Bad Idea.

Conservapedia lives and breathes hypocrisy. They also blow their horn about Free Speech so much, but the moment somebody says anything they feel uncomfortable about, they erase it (and often block the user).

I think Henry also has an account here (SHahB - though it's always hard to verify since the CP Henry won't even readily admit in public that he knows of RW), so you might have a chance after all. Also, I think you may be interested in the "Mister Sticky Fingers" section on Conservapedia Talk:What is going on at CP?. You'll also see the user I mentioned above there (pretty much everybody just calls him Bohdan since he only recently was renamed from Bohdan to HenryS). --Sid 07:27, 21 April 2008 (EDT)

Hi KT, here's a copy of your talk page on CP. I happened to still have it open in a browser window despite it being memory holed. So you can read what little HenryS/SHahB/Bohdan had to say.  Lily ^{Ta, wack!} 07:31, 21 April 2008 (EDT)

Dunno if it's true but: 23:30, 21 April 2008 Karajou (Talk | contribs) blocked "KarenD (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (sock of banned user KTDiputsho )   ^Contribs_Talk 23:39, 21 April 2008 (EDT)

ANQTNL! KTDiputsho 17:55, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

HAHAHA!

:) SHahB 18:45, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

So HenryS/ShahB/Bohdan it must be pretty cool to be a Gruppenführer in Andy's SS. Bet you feel real smug with all that power don't you? But you really are a coward. You make blocks and then not only fail to respond but disable your email. So someone who is blocked cannot appeal to the blocking sysop without creating another account. What a piece of shameless scum you are to come over here and gloat. I hope your parents are proud of what you do, because I would be ashamed of a son who acted like you. Not only are you an accessory to plagiarism/theft but you are dishonorable. As ye sow, so shall ye reap. KTDiputsho 19:06, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

Easy, tiger... Deep breath n' all that. --Robledo 19:26, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

Pardon me Robledo, but when someone blocks on Conservapedia for no reason other than stopping legitimate discourse and then comes here and gloats, then I think I have every right to feel indignant. KTDiputsho 19:37, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

You were blocked for creating an account with a name meant to attack another user. SHahB 19:47, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

Of course, no one contributing to this thread has ever had their name be a parody of another user. --Shagie 19:53, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

Shagie, KTD isn't a sock of yours is it?   ^Contribs_Talk 19:54, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

Unless blocked, I don't sock. One active account at a time. KTD isn't me - here or there. I was just pointing out that blocking a person for their name being a parody of another user is especially ironic coming from Bohdan. Now, maybe if he suggested to KTD that he change his name, it wouldn't be quite as rich in irony. --Shagie 19:59, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

Bohdan, come on. Just unblock his account and let him change his name.... It was kind of a stupid move by KTD in the first place, but he was a troll in name only - he wasn't damaging Consevapedia. And disabling email? What the hell? Just because you're at Conservapedia doesn't mean you have to do as the others do. You're not like them. Uchiha^KATON! 20:07, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

I meant to disable the email a long time ago. I will unblock if you agree to change the name (ask Aschlafly), and admit it was just a jab at Tk. And you have to agree to stay away from tk if he comes back to CP. SHahB 20:27, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

I find it utterly fascinating how some sysops are so fixated on users admitting guilt. Ed tried to do it with me (repeatedly). He always told me how he'd like to give me a "second chance" and put me on "parole" after I got banned for purely personal reasons (repeatedly). And he basically expected me to say "Yes, thank you! I have sinned, and I appreciate your mercy!" Seriously, do you guys masturbate while you force users into admitting guilt? No, wait, don't answer that.

There are so much easier solutions. You could have simply made the block to Allow Account Creation (if you did, we can skip this entire drama and he can just re-register under another name without kissing your ass), or you could have alerted Andy. He often enough told users to pick another name and then just renamed them without blocking. You're just powertripping here. --Sid 21:26, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

This is wonderful. Let me summarise:

1. The single biggest mocker of usernames on RW blocks someone on CP for a mocking username
2. "I meant to disable email a long time ago". What sort of admission is that for a sysop when the only way someone can 'legitimately' protest a block is to email the blocking sysop
3. Demands that KTD admits to mockery but requires no admission of plagiary (in contravention of two CP rules) from TK
4. Says user can come back if they pick another user name but blocked KarenD (a non offensive user name) as an alleged sock after having withdrawn from communication by disabling personal email
5. Demands that an editor stays away from TK (when it is TK that sticks his nose in all over the place) but comes here and taunts the blocked editor
6. And finally the sysop is probably a meat-puppet of TK, otherwise how did he spot KTD's name so quickly?

Any further comment would be gilding the lily (and I should know).  Lily ^{Ta, wack!} 03:21, 23 April 2008 (EDT)

Heh, I also nearly soiled myself with laughter when I saw WeirdEd gibbering on about me admitting my errors and earning his trust etc to carry on editing at CP. Absolutely freakin hilarious. Its all just a power trip for them. CP? Epeen. Fox 04:16, 23 April 2008 (EDT)