Information icon.svg Voting in the 2023 RationalWiki Moderator Election is now closed. Results to come!

User talk:Merkel

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Great news Rightpedia was deleted. It was a bunch of Nazi paedos and other freaks. I read that all Orain domain info and storage is deleted, so hopefully even if Orain get back online - Rightpedia will never be restored. Krom (talk) 07:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Are you from Rightpedia?[edit]

Mikemikev is just using Rightpedia for his personal feuds and vendettas; he's creating revenge articles on people who either banned him from forums, or who have debated him. The Right Stuff banned him, so predictably he created an article attacking Mike Enoch.

And if you're from Rightpedia, how do you tolerate the fact Mikemikev is a paedophile who also posted he supports child murder?

I think Rightpedia is a ridiculous site for its crazy opinions and anti-Semitic views; but to have a paedophile editing there?? Dr. Witt (talk) 23:47, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


You have been writing falsehoods and slander about Rationalwiki users to try and cause trouble, your edits were archived in the chicken coop and seen as trolling. Nobody has doxxed anyone on Rationalwiki. Your Neo-Nazi friend Michael Coombs uses his name on his twitter, publicly. There is no harassment on his article and no dox, there is no address or contact information, the article is all sourced to his own words. You and Mikemikev have been writing attack pages on Rightpedia about Rationalwiki users, not the other way round.

If you are so concerned about doxing then tell Mikemikev to stop doing it on Rightpedia. He has been uploading the addresses of innocent families which is illegal and cowardly, on Rightpedia articles to attack and threaten people. Yet you allow it and do nothing. You won't find this sort of harassment on Rationalwiki. This website sticks to the facts that are well sourced in the public domain. Anti-Fascist for life (talk) 03:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

I have removed your block and given you a second chance, don't abuse it. Comrade GC (talk) 03:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
According to Dr. Witt, Merkel is Wyatt from rightpedia. Whilst he hasn't done any doxing on Rationalwiki per se (yet), over at Rightpedia he has been doing it with Mikemikev. DangerZone (talk) 03:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
What evidence does Witt have of this claim? Comrade GC (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Merkel is obviously associated with the website Rightpedia [1], he suddenly appeared to defend Michael Coombs last week [2]. Rightpedia only has about four editors. The word "sophistry" in that diff is a give away to me. Wyatt has used that word elsewhere on the web. In his post on the chicken coop, he was defending Eleonóra Dubiczki. Who else would be defending these neo-Nazis? Anti-Fascist for life (talk) 03:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
I personally do not understand Merkel's doxing claim. Michael Coombs is not a "secret" name like he claimed, it is public information found all over the internet. See the Michael Coombs @ Mikemikev on twitter, and his gab account here uses "Michael Coombs" Mikemikev. Mikemikev also signed up to Rationalwiki with his name. I suspect Merkel is trolling us. DangerZone (talk) 03:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
I think Dr. Witt has summed it up best. Michael Coombs is shitting himself IRL right now because he is worried the authorities in the UK may arrest him over his hate speech. Michael Coombs on his twitter has been talking about shooting black and Jewish people and on forums endorsing things like child murder and denying the holocaust. It has all been documented at his rationalwiki article and now he is running scared and wants it all deleted so he has sent Merkel to help him. He obviously does not want to man up for his actions. He has a ten year toxic internet history by choice. If he was a normal dude doing normal things his - RW article wouldn't exist. It's all his fault nobody else. I believe by 2019 this guy will be in prison. Anti-Fascist for life (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
The coop page says:
When presenting a case here, be sure to include who you are accusing, what exactly you are accusing them of, some hard evidence, and a brief explanation. Since the sole purpose of the Coop is to resolve these disputes, don't post unrelated or more generalized complaints here — if you do, your posts will be moved off the page. Any vote started within 48 hours of filing will be deleted and you will be blocked.
Pls stop editing the coop archive pages. If you have some issues, I encourage you to bring them up on the relevant article talk pages instead. Cheers, Cosmikdebris (talk) 03:44, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
For someone to like a person's edits to gain adminiship after a week on a wiki, one has to be very experienced. I've read this site for informational purposes for years and I don't edit that much because I am not sure if people will like my edits. In contrast, Dr. Witt and Anti-Fascist both were so experienced with editing this site, they gained adminship in about a week after making their accounts. Both those accounts are less than a month old and were created within 3 days of each other. Merkel (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Grammar, punctuation & posting-style is clearly different... Are you saying I change all that each time I log on separate users, if I own these two accounts? Obviously nonsense. As I pointed out on the coop: "Anti-fascist" isn't me. Considering you appear to be a compulsive liar with the stuff you've already written, I'm sure you will ignore this though.Dr. Witt (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

And he admits it[edit]

"I currently have about active 8 users who are sysops; de-sysop this one makes no difference."

Above he admits he has many sysop accounts here. I mentioned this fact and everyone flung venomous insults at me. "I've used this site since the beginning of 2012;" he finally admitted.

Dr. Witt and User:Anti-Fascist for life put that they retire on their user page at the same time. The second account didn't get its sysop powers removed like the first.

Merkel (talk) 02:11, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Sock-puppeting is aloud on this Wiki, some sysops have more than one account and they openly admit it. Maybe you haven't read the rules here. BTW as I already noted Anti-Fascist for life is not Dr. Witt. I know this user in real life, they are unrelated. DangerZone (talk) 03:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

@ Merkel[edit]

Mikemikev posted threats or was trying to intimidate me by saying he will show up on my door. The guy is about 10 stone and almost anorexic; he would crap himself meeting me in person. You forget we have what he looks like on video; put in around2: 10 and he was named the "bean-pole Nazi" on Kiwi FARMS. Even the Nazis from the The Right Stuff were mocking his laughable physique. When am I to expect this lanky ugly weirdo on my door-step?Dr. Witt (talk) 04:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Merkel is neo-Nazi Wyatt[edit]

Merkel is an alternative account of a neo-Nazi white supremacist user called "Wyatt" who administrates the notorious hate website rightpedia.

I am confused to why Rationalwiki a left-wing website is allowing this Nazi to post here? I am antifa and I will not tolerate it. (talk) 04:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Merkel is also really Ted Cruz. He operates inside Donald Trump's basement, while he secretly contemplates on becoming the Zodiac killer again. But we all know the truth, he was the guy that spaded our food supply with 9/11 chemicals that turn the snow into plastic. Remember, everybody burn your snow with a lighter to make sure that your snow isn't actually plastic. It's so your frogs don't turn gay.—(((CheeseburgerFace))) Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 04:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Atlantid, the evidence you claim for that is I said a word. I looked up the word on a search of all content at Rightpedia. The long version has only two entries. One is an essay by Karl Marx and the other is a talk comment by a different user on Rightpedia who is now banned. The shorter form of that word is only on three pages, all content from Wikipedia. The main person who uses that word is a famous vlogger and I'll let you figure out who that is. Merkel (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
The evidence is you're an single-purpose-account. Nearly all your edits, early ones at least, were on Metapedia/Rightpedia and you showed up to defend the latter. That website only has 3 active admins, Wyatt, Hu1 and Mike aka the three stooges. Which one are you? Since you showed up to defend Mike, and you have a different post-style, you're unlikely to be him. So Hu1 or Wyatt? Also, you weren't "vindicated" about anything: you listed half-a-dozen accounts Dr. Witt denied owning; nowhere did he say he didn't own other (but different) accounts. You also think you got a "confession" from Dr. Witt he has used this wiki since January 2012; that's public knowledge, something he's said for years. You're incredibly dumb. (talk) 13:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Rightpedia going offline[edit]

We will just shut your neo-Nazi troll website down - multiple reports sent to its host. In fact its already unreachable today? If it comes back, we will just send more complaints.Nick Lowles Fan (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Where exactly is your evidence that Merkel is s neo nazi? Christopher (talk) 16:45, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
It’s still online, use third party websites to check though. Christopher (talk) 16:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Nick Lowles Fan is slightly wrong it is not closed right now. Rightpedia is hosted by GoDaddy, it is still online now but I have received information they are looking into abuse about the website. I believe it will be closed next week personally. As for Merkel he is an admin at Rightpedia. He turns up to Rationalwiki every time an edit is made on the Rightpedia related articles. Asian dude (talk) 16:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Linking to a neo nazis account doesn’t prove they’re related in any way. Unless you’ve got actual evidence Merkel is a neo nazi, stop saying they are. Christopher (talk) 17:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Icon fedora.svg * dons Mod Hat *Icon fedora.svg

@Nick Lowles Fan: Please stop bringing up the idea of shutting Rightpedia down. Any further discussion about this will result in a banhammer. RationalWiki is not a hatesite.—(((CheeseburgerFace))) Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 17:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

"Nick Lowles Fan" for your issue about the article on "Nick Lowles" at Rightpedia, it has one sole edit from user Vajna. Vajna is simply a bot that imports content from backups. If you look at the earliest contributions of Vajna there, December 22-25 or so was when Vajna was mass importing content to Rightpedia. Thousands of pages a day, far more than anyone can write.

If someone did write an article, there's usually more than one edit.

Rightpedia imported its articles from Metapedia. The "Nick Lowles" article was deleted there but the deletion logs show that "and the only contributor was "Basileus"". Basileus wrote a bunch of hit articles and then vanished after the split between Metapedia and Rightpedia. Basileus never returned.

You can look at any of the pictures in Rightpedia's "Nick Lowles" article. They are uploaded by "Maintenance script" on Rightpedia. And then Metapedia, you'll see they were uploaded by Basileus. Merkel (talk) 18:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Vajna is not a bot, this user has talked to users on her user-page [3]. Seriously dude, Eleonora is going to end up get sued or in prison. These racist hit-piece articles are defamation and are being hosted at Rightpedia a website registered by Eleonóra. The real Nick Lowles knows about it as do other anti-fascists. Many people have complained to GoDaddy about these hit-piece articles. I say Rightpedia is on its last legs. Asian dude (talk) 18:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

So you're saying that when Vajna was uploading thousands of articles a day early on around the time the "Nick Lowles" article was made, that was the Rightpedia owner painstakingly writing the article? And did it in only one edit? Does the real Nick Lowles know that it was a user "Basileus" from Metapedia who wrote the entire article back then? The only difference is that Metapedia deleted it. All the images on the Rightpedia article were uploaded by a user "Maintenance script" and if you check on Metapedia, they were uploaded by user "Basileus". Metapedia deleted the article but the images even still remain.
If you can contact Nick Lowles, you should let him know "Basileus" from Metapedia wrote it and this person vanished after the Rightpedia-Metapedia split. Merkel (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Gerry Gable, Nick Lowles, Luciana Berger, Southern Poverty Law Center, Hope Not Hate, Searchlight and many other people all know about their Rightpedia articles which are extremely offensive and defamatory. I know for a fact some of these people have complained about it. Rightpedia has illegal racist articles about these people that defames them. It does not matter who wrote them, the content is being hosted on Rightpedia and the website is registered by Eleonóra Dubiczki. Eleonora is responsible and all these people have her personal details if they want to take it further. Anti racist skinhead (talk) 18:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
I am pressing the Southern Poverty Law Center about this, they may cover it on their website :) — Unsigned, by: Anti racist skinhead / talk / contribs
Do you remember back a year or two ago when PewDiePie's big nazi scandal was in the news? I wrote to the SPLC asking them to cover it and they never did. Merkel (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
If Eleanora goes to prison or ends up getting sued and losing her job at her library, can I look after her cats :) Asian dude (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if Basiliues edited[edit]

It doesn't matter who specifically made the defamatory and hate speech edits on Rightpedia; the point is Rightpedia is hosting this illegal content and since eleonora is the site owner she is to blame.

Mikemikev has been doxing people's street addresses and writing libellous articles on people he's had a spat with on other forums; in other words Mikemikev is using Rightpedia to attack random people he disputes over the internet. Can you not see this?

Why doesn't eleonora delete Mikemikev's defamatory articles?Nick Lowles Fan (talk) 22:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Because she doesn't care? I mean, this should be obvious -- neo-Nazis aren't going to be upset when the people they want gassed are doxxed. Also, why are we having this conversation on Merkel's talk page, and why do you keep switching accounts? Spriggina (sgwrs) (cyfraniadau) @ 22:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

I was just emailed about this. I just want to say, Hope Not Hate is investigating the matter. Michael Coombs edited the hit-piece article on Rightpedia about Hope Not Hate. He is from the UK and this individual has been reported to the Cardiff police. Hope Not Hate member (talk) 22:39, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


A case involving you has been raised at the Chicken Coop. Feel free to comment. ODS (talk) 12:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Eleonóra Dubiczki and Tesco store[edit]

I am generally interested why did you sign up fake details with the registrar for Rightpedia. You used a Tesco store as your address. Naughty Naughty. Did you think antifa would not find out? They find everything out about Nazis. Hope Not Hate are going to do a future article on you and Rightpedia. Cool eh? (talk) 21:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Why are you impersonating me?[edit]

Sheer psychological projection you falsely accuse me of impersonating others, when there's now the following evidence presented by JuniusThaddeus you created a sock here impersonating me:

"RaiderFan is Merkel. Look at the timeline: "RaiderFan claims Brian Ruhe is Jewish] (06:50, 29 January 2017). DiamondDisc1 blocks RaiderFan (07:18, 29 January 2017). Merkel picks up where RaiderFan left off (01:14, 30 January 2017).Also, RaiderFan's userpage fits Wyatt's profile. The userpage mentions glyphosate, and Wyatt spent considerable time editing Metapedia's and Rightpedia's Monsanto article: JuniusThaddeus (talk) 12:12, 9 March 2018 (UTC)"

What a nutcase.ODS (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2018 (UTC)