|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|Where?||0||05:29, 23 June 2013|
|Just saying||1||02:00, 29 August 2012|
|It works!||6||02:31, 30 May 2012|
|Tone||2||05:16, 25 May 2012|
|this thread||1||07:28, 19 May 2012|
|telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal||15||05:43, 14 May 2012|
|Happy birthday, peckerwood!||1||07:46, 11 May 2012|
|5 min block||1||22:15, 10 May 2012|
|Rules||7||04:47, 9 May 2012|
|Curiosity||8||03:09, 7 May 2012|
|Do not censor me||10||19:01, 27 April 2012|
|Sigs||0||03:34, 25 April 2012|
|Rob and tornados||17||18:25, 15 April 2012|
|Hey||1||04:04, 10 April 2012|
|Powers. Back Now. Please.||8||02:11, 10 April 2012|
|i swear im going to force him to stop if thats what it takes.||3||02:06, 10 April 2012|
|"don't edit"||1||22:25, 9 April 2012|
|WIGOCP||0||08:59, 7 April 2012|
|So, when did you join the anti-Obama club?||7||00:40, 7 April 2012|
|Ameriwiki||1||05:23, 31 March 2012|
Perhaps, and you would probably get further and have more credibility if you didn't accuse anyone who dosen't attempt to justify genocide as "pushing an anti-serb pov".Thannad (talk) 04:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
My evil plan to make your horrible system with notes and stuff obsolete is up and running:
Doesn't work on lqt though...
Then you'll need to copy the script over to your own userspace, and change where it says 'User:PeterL/ex' to your own page 'o phrases.
Why yes I'm working on fixing tone problems in other articles. I don't have to finish before we can recognize the merit of a good edit to the D'souza article. Stop reverting a good edit.
So basically you're saying "stop having an opinion that isn't ours".
Last edit: 05:43, 14 May 2012
did i say that? no. But your acting like there isnt a problem when there is; american civil unions are not viewed as equal to marriages; and they aren't. you telling us "why are you complaining" just makes you look like an ass
Yeah, except that I conceded quite early on that the US is different and I was talking from a NZ POV, and then asked if you'd make the same argument if you lived in NZ where civil unions are the same as marriage.
I think the heat of the arguement was getting to me then :/ sorry , personally i'd only take issue if marriage was still seen as better.
But here's the thing. is the NZ thing REALLY equal? Can gays marry? That's all I want to know. or are they too different to be allowed to marry?
so I googled. NZ does NOT allow gay marriage. "marriage" is "special" for straights only. how can you not see that this makes gays less, Ace? they dont' get to play with your toys. they are not good enough. why? ONE REASON ONLY.
They are gay. (black, muslim, women, etc.) it's bigotry.
I can barely believe it - Mikalos disagreeing with Ace. Not only that but you're on the right side of the argument too. It's like watching a butterfly emerge from a cocoon - a sycophantic cocoon. Well done mate; incidentally I want blacks to have all the advantages of marriage, but they really can't use our word can they? When was the last time you saw a bride walk down the aisle in a black dress? QED.
I'm well aware that comments get accidentally erased, perhaps even without getting noticed. But it took me a couple of minutes to find the error and to correct it, so I thought it would be only fair to block you for an equal amount of time.
I don't think it is up to you to decide what other people have or have not on their own talkpages and I would leave that to user. You know RW has very few actual written rules.
ok; i can accept that reasoning. sorry for the bot revert.
We actually do have very specific written rules on this point, hammered out during our massive brawls; posts are not to be altered or removed from talk-pages, with the following exceptions: (1) posts from blocked users, (2) obviously vile trolling comments, and (3) personal attacks posted on a user's talk-page, if removed by that user.
Then it isn't Mikalos's job to trolltop/bottom Brx's talkpage.
Could you perhaps tell me what it is about me you find so worthy of contempt, as you mentioned here?
I personally think that any charges against me are greatly exaggerated, if not false.
Well, that doesn't really explain your behavior or that of other members of this site, does it?
of the people who dislike you im probably one of the people in the "not terribly much" grouping
When you decide to not be an annoying troll, i will.
~ <3 mikal
What did he say? Can't find anything...
nothing actually, but i decided to view his "new zealand x y z" stupidity as saying "fuck those hit by tornadoes"
You'd think someone from Omaha Nebraska would know that. Go ahead, I'll give you more time to Google it so you can come up with the right answer.
I just want to say thanks for volunteering your time and no hard feelings were meant.
i had actually considered removing my sysop rights during my attempted 30 minute cool down, and i noticed that except for my own self-giving of auto patrolled rights, my rights log consisted one one event: my sysop :D,
Oh, they're useful. Just as soon as he gets them back, he gets to use them to needlessly block all my backup accounts!
User rights: great for harassing people you don't like.
do you ever stop to think this is entirely your fault he doesn't like you?
I don't care that he doesn't like me. He's shown his true colors long ago, and I don't like him either. I haven't done anything wrong, I haven't broken any rules, and I'm getting picked on regardless.
It doesn't matter that I'm unpopular. Popularity is not a factor in justice.
Great. So you're going to unilaterally block me for no good reason after my rights were removed for no good reason. Just great
no, im going to block you so you can SHUT UP and and stop damning yourself. if somebody wants to take me to task for doing you a damn favor and saving yourself thats on them, but i actually dont have you enough to just shoot you in the street, yet.
You're like Ken. "No reason", ok "no good reason". What's next?
You know, they can easily just use random page or something. Putting a moratorium on editing won't solve a thing.
Since you evidently are in agreement with A Schlalfy that Barack Obama's Christianity is in question, you are aware the Creationist website godand science.org calls Satan a son of God? Besides Andy, perhaps you are also in agreement with User:Maratrean about Mormons b that eleiving "Jesus is a separate person from God the Father, and, given we are God's literal children, he is quite literally the Son of God. If a man is a good, when he grows up (i.e. dies), God will turn him into a God..."
Why did you revert the posting, other than you are a covert pro-Andy and CP operative trying to cover up unfair and deliberately biased criticism of our President?
... please excuse me while i simultaneously facepalm and laugh.
Either that, our your just a nitwit with ZERO political and analytical skills, which is more plausible.