User talk:Miekal/LQT

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This is an archive page, last updated 21 May 2014. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, (new)(back)

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Where?005:29, 23 June 2013
Just saying102:00, 29 August 2012
It works!602:31, 30 May 2012
Tone205:16, 25 May 2012
this thread107:28, 19 May 2012
telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal1505:43, 14 May 2012
Happy birthday, peckerwood!107:46, 11 May 2012
5 min block122:15, 10 May 2012
Rules704:47, 9 May 2012
Curiosity803:09, 7 May 2012
Do not censor me1019:01, 27 April 2012
Sigs003:34, 25 April 2012
Rob and tornados1718:25, 15 April 2012
Hey104:04, 10 April 2012
Powers. Back Now. Please.802:11, 10 April 2012
i swear im going to force him to stop if thats what it takes.302:06, 10 April 2012
"don't edit"122:25, 9 April 2012
WIGOCP008:59, 7 April 2012
So, when did you join the anti-Obama club?700:40, 7 April 2012
Ameriwiki105:23, 31 March 2012
First page
First page
Previous page
Previous page
Last page
Last page

Perhaps, and you would probably get further and have more credibility if you didn't accuse anyone who dosen't attempt to justify genocide as "pushing an anti-serb pov".Thannad (talk) 04:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Thannad (talk)04:01, 17 March 2012

uh huh.....

il'Dictator Mikal04:05, 17 March 2012
 

My evil plan to make your horrible system with notes and stuff obsolete is up and running:

Exasperation-list.png

Doesn't work on lqt though...

Peter with added ‼Science‼09:13, 29 May 2012

far to much work

il'Dictator Mikal13:44, 29 May 2012
Coffee spray.gif All you need to do is add
importScript('User:PeterL/exasperation.js');
Peter with added ‼Science‼00:47, 30 May 2012

yes but if i want to add more...

il'Dictator Mikal01:49, 30 May 2012

Then you'll need to copy the script over to your own userspace, and change where it says 'User:PeterL/ex' to your own page 'o phrases.

Peter with added ‼Science‼02:07, 30 May 2012

Or, I could modify the script...

ED: OK, just add the importscript line and create your own User:Mikalos209/ex page with the same format as mine. Much simpler than notes galore.

Peter with added ‼Science‼02:08, 30 May 2012
 
 
 
 
 

Why yes I'm working on fixing tone problems in other articles. I don't have to finish before we can recognize the merit of a good edit to the D'souza article. Stop reverting a good edit.

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg05:09, 25 May 2012

-shrug- ok

il'Dictator Mikal05:10, 25 May 2012
 

That edit was mostly personal trivia and a complete removal of snark. Not exactly an improvement.

~ Kupochama[1][2]05:16, 25 May 2012
 

political cartoon megathread

ONE / TALK07:26, 19 May 2012

Hm, interesting. Danke for the link.

il'Dictator Mikal07:28, 19 May 2012
 

telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal

So basically you're saying "stop having an opinion that isn't ours".

AceModerator21:52, 9 May 2012
Edited by 2 users.
Last edit: 05:43, 14 May 2012

did i say that? no. But your acting like there isnt a problem when there is; american civil unions are not viewed as equal to marriages; and they aren't. you telling us "why are you complaining" just makes you look like an ass

il'Dictator Mikal21:54, 9 May 2012

Yeah, except that I conceded quite early on that the US is different and I was talking from a NZ POV, and then asked if you'd make the same argument if you lived in NZ where civil unions are the same as marriage.

AceModerator21:56, 9 May 2012

I think the heat of the arguement was getting to me then :/ sorry , personally i'd only take issue if marriage was still seen as better.

il'Dictator Mikal21:59, 9 May 2012

But here's the thing. is the NZ thing REALLY equal? Can gays marry? That's all I want to know. or are they too different to be allowed to marry?

Green mowse.pngGodot22:01, 9 May 2012

Answered in the saloon bar.

AceModerator22:02, 9 May 2012
 

so I googled. NZ does NOT allow gay marriage. "marriage" is "special" for straights only. how can you not see that this makes gays less, Ace? they dont' get to play with your toys. they are not good enough. why? ONE REASON ONLY.

They are gay. (black, muslim, women, etc.) it's bigotry.

Green mowse.pngGodot22:03, 9 May 2012
 
 
 

I can barely believe it - Mikalos disagreeing with Ace. Not only that but you're on the right side of the argument too. It's like watching a butterfly emerge from a cocoon - a sycophantic cocoon. Well done mate; incidentally I want blacks to have all the advantages of marriage, but they really can't use our word can they? When was the last time you saw a bride walk down the aisle in a black dress? QED.

Tielec01 (talk)23:16, 9 May 2012

"the right side of the argument too" Debatable.

AceModerator23:18, 9 May 2012
 
 
 

Happy birthday, peckerwood!

^ You are a man now.

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg05:58, 11 May 2012

So that's what he was talking about. Happy arbitrary milestone!

Peter with added ‼Science‼07:46, 11 May 2012
 

I'm well aware that comments get accidentally erased, perhaps even without getting noticed. But it took me a couple of minutes to find the error and to correct it, so I thought it would be only fair to block you for an equal amount of time.

larronsicut fur in nocte22:13, 10 May 2012

hm... i should employ this reasoning...

il'Dictator Mikal22:15, 10 May 2012
 

I don't think it is up to you to decide what other people have or have not on their own talkpages and I would leave that to user. You know RW has very few actual written rules.

AceModerator04:31, 9 May 2012

ok; i can accept that reasoning. sorry for the bot revert.

il'Dictator Mikal04:32, 9 May 2012

That is my interpretation anyway.

AceModerator04:35, 9 May 2012

Reasonable one

il'Dictator Mikal04:38, 9 May 2012
 

We actually do have very specific written rules on this point, hammered out during our massive brawls; posts are not to be altered or removed from talk-pages, with the following exceptions: (1) posts from blocked users, (2) obviously vile trolling comments, and (3) personal attacks posted on a user's talk-page, if removed by that user.

Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX04:40, 9 May 2012

Then it isn't Mikalos's job to trolltop/bottom Brx's talkpage.

AceModerator04:43, 9 May 2012
 

is trolltop/bottom considered removing?

il'Dictator Mikal04:46, 9 May 2012

It is mentioned on the Community Standards page as one of two ways to conceal "obviously vile" trolling comments.

Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX04:47, 9 May 2012
 
 
 
 

Could you perhaps tell me what it is about me you find so worthy of contempt, as you mentioned here?

I personally think that any charges against me are greatly exaggerated, if not false.

"Shut up, Brx."17:31, 4 May 2012

I just find you annoying, the way you do things.

il'Dictator Mikal17:36, 4 May 2012

Well, that doesn't really explain your behavior or that of other members of this site, does it?

"Shut up, Brx."17:45, 4 May 2012
of the people who dislike you im probably one of the people in the "not terribly much" grouping
il'Dictator Mikal17:39, 6 May 2012

And yet, you're one of those that's nearly always on my case.

"Shut up, Brx."02:51, 7 May 2012

-shrug- character flaw.

il'Dictator Mikal03:09, 7 May 2012
 
 
 
 
 

Do not censor me

Thank you.

Talsley (talk)17:52, 27 April 2012

When you decide to not be an annoying troll, i will.

~ <3 mikal
il'Dictator Mikal18:00, 27 April 2012

What is the mouse for?

Talsley (talk)18:03, 27 April 2012

mouse?

il'Dictator Mikal18:04, 27 April 2012

<3 A mouse head.

Talsley (talk)18:04, 27 April 2012

Boring troll.

Colonel Sanders (talk)18:14, 27 April 2012
 

most people call that a heart

il'Dictator Mikal18:51, 27 April 2012
 
 
 
 
 

I change mine periodically when they start to get boring. I SUBST them for posterity, unlike other people who had some truly fantastic sigs but refused to SUBST them, resulting in only their current, rather dull sig.

ТySerious Business Guy03:34, 25 April 2012

Rob and tornados

What did he say? Can't find anything...

P-Foster Talk "The existing superstructure has handed out crumbs. We don’t want crumbs; we want the whole loaf now.” --Ras Frank I 17:07, 15 April 2012

nothing actually, but i decided to view his "new zealand x y z" stupidity as saying "fuck those hit by tornadoes"

il'Dictator Mikal17:22, 15 April 2012

What does Ak-sar-ben? mean?

nobsCorporations are people, too.17:49, 15 April 2012

What's that got to do with the price of fish?

il'Dictator Mikal17:52, 15 April 2012

You'd think someone from Omaha Nebraska would know that. Go ahead, I'll give you more time to Google it so you can come up with the right answer.

nobsCorporations are people, too.17:55, 15 April 2012

What's that got to do with the price of fish?

il'Dictator Mikal17:56, 15 April 2012
 
 
 
 
 

I just want to say thanks for volunteering your time and no hard feelings were meant.

Senator Harrison (talk)23:45, 9 April 2012

none too you, and thanks, sorta

il'Dictator Mikal04:04, 10 April 2012
 

Powers. Back Now. Please.

Thanks.

P-Foster Talk "Armed with the knowledge of our past we can charter a course for our future"--MX01:42, 10 April 2012

So now they're useful, eh?

Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem01:44, 10 April 2012

i had actually considered removing my sysop rights during my attempted 30 minute cool down, and i noticed that except for my own self-giving of auto patrolled rights, my rights log consisted one one event: my sysop :D,

il'Dictator Mikal01:48, 10 April 2012
 

Oh, they're useful. Just as soon as he gets them back, he gets to use them to needlessly block all my backup accounts!

User rights: great for harassing people you don't like.

"Shut up, Brx."01:51, 10 April 2012

do you ever stop to think this is entirely your fault he doesn't like you?

il'Dictator Mikal01:53, 10 April 2012

I don't care that he doesn't like me. He's shown his true colors long ago, and I don't like him either. I haven't done anything wrong, I haven't broken any rules, and I'm getting picked on regardless.

It doesn't matter that I'm unpopular. Popularity is not a factor in justice.

"Shut up, Brx."02:01, 10 April 2012

Really? That's amazing because im pretty sure popular people have gotten away with some pretty light sentences that get normal people long jail time.

il'Dictator Mikal02:02, 10 April 2012
 
 
 
 
 

i swear im going to force him to stop if thats what it takes.

Great. So you're going to unilaterally block me for no good reason after my rights were removed for no good reason. Just great

"Shut up, Brx."02:03, 10 April 2012

no, im going to block you so you can SHUT UP and and stop damning yourself. if somebody wants to take me to task for doing you a damn favor and saving yourself thats on them, but i actually dont have you enough to just shoot you in the street, yet.

il'Dictator Mikal02:04, 10 April 2012
 

You're like Ken. "No reason", ok "no good reason". What's next?

Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem02:05, 10 April 2012

What are you talking about?

"Shut up, Brx."02:06, 10 April 2012
 
 

You know, they can easily just use random page or something. Putting a moratorium on editing won't solve a thing.

"Shut up, Brx."19:18, 9 April 2012

You know, in locking the coop you're preventing me from weighing in. My sysop rights were removed.

"Shut up, Brx."22:25, 9 April 2012
 

I understand that you don't like Rob but don't delete WIGOs.

 Lily Inspirate me.08:59, 7 April 2012

So, when did you join the anti-Obama club?

Since you evidently are in agreement with A Schlalfy that Barack Obama's Christianity is in question, you are aware the Creationist website godand science.org calls Satan a son of God? Besides Andy, perhaps you are also in agreement with User:Maratrean about Mormons b that eleiving "Jesus is a separate person from God the Father, and, given we are God's literal children, he is quite literally the Son of God. If a man is a good, when he grows up (i.e. dies), God will turn him into a God..."

nobsbullies are people, too.00:27, 7 April 2012

... wha?

il'Dictator Mikal00:28, 7 April 2012

Why did you revert the posting, other than you are a covert pro-Andy and CP operative trying to cover up unfair and deliberately biased criticism of our President?

nobsbullies are people, too.00:33, 7 April 2012

... please excuse me while i simultaneously facepalm and laugh.

il'Dictator Mikal00:36, 7 April 2012

Either that, our your just a nitwit with ZERO political and analytical skills, which is more plausible.

nobsbullies are people, too.00:38, 7 April 2012

no comment

il'Dictator Mikal00:40, 7 April 2012
 

Now I'm really confused - that line only works as Mikal's response, but as he said something else you posted anyway?

Maybe Ace is right.

Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem00:40, 7 April 2012
 
 
 
 

I don't think you get it, somehow. Is there any medication you may have forgotten to take..?

Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem00:29, 7 April 2012
 

...is apparently not quite dead yet. How come?

Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem05:22, 31 March 2012

better to ask CS, i only show up to call them on stuff usually.

il'Dictator Mikal05:23, 31 March 2012
 
First page
First page
Previous page
Previous page
Last page
Last page