Welfare queen

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reagan popularized the term during his 1976 presidential bid.
We don't want to turn the safety net into a hammock that lulls able-bodied people to lives of dependency and complacency.
Paul Ryan... who paid for his university education by living off his father's Social Security benefits.[1]
God, guns, and freedom
U.S. Politics
Icon politics USA.svg
Starting arguments over Thanksgiving dinner
Persons of interest

"Welfare queen" was one of many dumb terms coined by Saint Reagan, this time to refer to people who scam the government through the welfare system to live easy on taxpayer money without trying to work. Reagan gave a very memorable speech in 1976 which described a welfare queen drawing an easy living by scamming veteran's benefits and Social Security benefits from four (fake) dead husbands, as well as using eighty different aliases. The closest case to the one he described was of a single woman who scammed the government out of $8,000,[2] and who, upon further investigation, wasn't emblematic of welfare users in general.[3] Whoops (also, welfare fraud was probably the least evil crime she committed, since she was also suspected of kidnapping and murder).

This, as well as Reagan's talk of "states' rights", using coded phrases such as "strapping young buck", describing the Voting Rights Act as "humiliating to the South", intervening on the side of Bob Jones University (which was on the verge of losing its tax-exempt status because of its ban on interracial dating), and firing three members of the Civil Rights Commission,Wikipedia was not at all aimed to appeal to Southern racism, and anyone who tells you otherwise is a dirty commie![4]

Stereotyping welfare recipients is an easy way to convince voters to reduce or get rid of these programs. It also has the benefit of manipulating the very people who benefit most from these programs into supporting their elimination (ironically the vast majority of welfare recipients live in red states).[5] Observational evidence indicates that increasing state welfare support through increased spending is associated with increased social engagement, and, in particular, increased desire and willingness to work.[6] But who cares about the evidence and quality of life when it conflicts with your ideology?

Modern usage[edit]

Today, "welfare queen" has evolved into a more general version of dog whistle politics against the new evil of "entitlements." While there are always going to be fraudsters and other people who badly abuse such programs, given the difficulties that private insurers of all kinds seem to have with the exact same problem (and openly advertise the fact that they increase your rates to deal with it) the only obvious difference would seem to be whether everyone else makes up for it in taxes to the government or premiums to insurance companies (or similar).

It plays very well into pitting people of different classes and races against each other. Race resentments very much factor into this, since only certain kinds of people (disadvantaged minorities) are portrayed as living on welfare.[7] Many opponents of welfare use the welfare queen stereotype as a way to rile up members of the lower middle class and working poor against those on welfare/unemployment/Social Security/Medicaid benefits. This is by making wild claims that welfare queens are living "high on the hog" while the poor folks have to work hard to barely scrape by.[8]

Notably, "welfare queen" is almost never used to refer to those who most deserve the label: the largest Republican-friendly corporations.[9]

Plastic surgery[edit]

One argument that popped up in the health care debate[10][11] is that people on Medicaid get free medical care on your dime, using purely the example of the documented rates of "plastic surgery" for Medicaid patients, while poor folks pay an arm and a leg to wait forever to see a general practitioner. What was not said is that the term "plastic surgery" in a hospital includes covered procedures for the replacement of skin for burn patients and rebuilding of parts removed for cancer surgery (such as breast reconstruction after mastectomies). Medicaid (and every other insurance) has never covered any purely cosmetic surgery, and you'll find the same around the world[12] — but apparently it's difficult for Republicans to do research.

The real welfare aristocracy[edit]

A few bucks on welfare is nice and all, but where does all that money get spent? Wal-Mart took in 13 billion dollars in revenue from foodstamps in 2013.[13]

See also[edit]