Fun talk:Andrew Schlafly/Archive3

This is an archive page, last updated 14 December 2024. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:

<2>, <1>

, (new)(back)

Pronunciation

Let us say that one was composing a series of limericks about CP users. How would he go about producing 'Schlafly' (for rhyming purposes)? EddyP 15:00, 22 February 2009 (EST)

Rhymes with Laugh-lee. See him pronounce it himself: [1] 15:04, 22 February 2009 (EST)

Thanks very much, that was what I was hoping for. Not sure if I should bother with the 'Schlaf' bit though. EddyP 15:07, 22 February 2009 (EST)

A sloppy but workable rhyme would be words like "roughly" or "toughly".

There once was a pervert named Schlafly

Who treated his gerbil most roughly

It chewed through the string

He had tied to his thing

And now he sings soprano less gruffly

Or something like that. ħuman 19:35, 22 February 2009 (EST)

Andy admits to being a Liberal.

[2] Andy, in this discussion, admits that he would Vote for the British National Party, which Wikipedia characterizes as "a far-right and whites-only political party in the United Kingdom.", however, Conservapedia's article is even more critical, describing it as "a British neo-Nazi political party". Since we all know that Nazi's were socialist, we can basically say that they were a liberal political party, since everyone also knows that Socialist and Liberals are the same. So, by claiming he would vote for a neo-Nazi party, Andy has just claimed that he himself, is against Conservapedia, and is just another part of the vast liberal conspiracy to brainwash our children, steal all of our money, and turn us all gay (that is what Liberals do, right? Of course, I just read Conservapedia, so I'm not sure). So, since it turns out that he has been a Liberal, what are we supposed to make fun of now? --Passerby25 16:45, 22 March 2009 (EDT)

My head hurts from reading that...User:Ttony21/sig2 16:49, 22 March 2009 (EDT)

From what I wrote, or the Conservapedia discussion? I need to learn to organize my thoughts when writing on the interwebz.--Passerby25 16:53, 22 March 2009 (EDT)

I think...

PennyLane 07:06, 23 March 2009 (EDT)I have a crush on Andy.

And some people find my grammar "different"

After I read this article, No wonder Human avoided using the term "problematic" in my talk page. Was he raised in an environment using any language besides english? Thieh 17:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Gallery of mockery

I will be honest, most of these are shit. I showed this to my brother once and he told me that the best part was how the last image (then Andy in his fort) was the funniest picture and it was a good thing that it was the last because after that none were funny any more. All the images should by together in Category:Andrew Schlafly if you want to look over them for you pleasure, but this need to be cut down to possibly only the best 15. So what I propose to do is put it to the mob to find the best, the rest can either go in the fun article or just die in the category. - π 02:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

• 

  "Wrong thinking is punished, right thinking is just as swiftly rewarded. You'll find it an effective combination."
  

  31

  Funny?

• 

  Fun is liberal!
  

  -3

  Funny?

• 

  Dancing queen, feel the beat from the tambourine.
  

  19

  Funny?

• 

  i herd u liek homskoolerz
  

  -12

  Funny?

• 

  This is Andy when he edits Conservapedia.
  

  -16

  Funny?

• 

  IMMA CHARGIN MY GODSPEED!!!!
  

  -10

  Funny?

• 

  I can haz beta blocker?
  

  -15

  Funny?

• 

  For defense only!
  

  2

  Funny?

• 

  Im on ur site drinkn ur coolade!
  

  -13

  Funny?

• 

  Childhood: Andy Pandy loves playing with all the boys and girls.
  

  -15

  Funny?

• 

  -2

  Funny?

• 

  
  

  -1

  Funny?

• 

  ...sick brilliant...
  

  16

  Funny?

• 

  Andy fighting the liberal scum from his comfortable fortress.
  

  24

  Funny?

• 

  Schlafly, detecting liberals.
  

  12

  Funny?

• 

  Young Andy, guided by the hand of Christ.
  

  -1

  Funny?

• 

  This is his persecution complex.
  

  -6

  Funny?

• 

  Teh wild, sinful days of teh Assfly.
  

  -7

  Funny?

• 

  Homezkoolers at Andy's home.
  

  5

  Funny?

• 

  Captain Schlafly and his cronies, prepared for a copy/paste fest!!!
  

  -10

  Funny?

• 

  Wafd al-Chl'resny, Schlafly's Muslim alter ego.
  

  -7

  Funny?

• 

  Open your mind. Welcome.
  

  5

  Funny?

• 

  Joaquín Martínez sketches a portrait of his master.
  

  -11

  Funny?

• Mr bean.jpg

  The face, the hair, the voice, the brains... it's uncanny.
  

  -19

  Funny?

• 

  Rejected Conservapedia promotion.
  

  -9

  Funny?

• 

  No.
  

  -11

  Funny?

• 

  A Very Assfly Xmas
  

  -16

  Funny?

• 

  Defensive weapon of YOU LOOKIN' AT ME!?.
  

  7

  Funny?

• 

  The Harvard Law Review dream-team
  

  -2

  Funny?

• 

  Long liev teh revolushun!
  

  31

  Funny?

• 

  Andy without makeup.
  

  -14

  Funny?

• 

  Just Andy: My own picture, and I release rights to it. Big mistake.
  

  25

  Funny?

• Dark helmet.jpg

  Lightspeed is too slow. We need to go at ludicrous GODSPEED!
  

  -19

  Funny?

• 

  "He dawns on them like the morning light, like the sun shining forth on a cloudless morning, like rain that makes grass to sprout from the earth..." - 2 Samuel 23:4
  

  -20

  Funny?

• 

  Mount Assfly, the greatest monument in all teh Andylands!
  

  -14

  Funny?

• 

  Kim Jong Schlafly - there can be only one Fearless Leader
  

  -7

  Funny?

• 

  Andy, video-game style.
  

  -12

  Funny?

• 

  Godspeed, possums!
  

  -13

  Funny?

• 

  Vote against this artless turd
  

  -11

  Funny?

Discussion

Wow, makes me wonder why I went through the effort of bothering. Thanks! --Kels 02:44, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

It is not personal about you Kels. It is just everytime someone make a picture of Andy for a specific purpose, they then add it to this, where stripped of its contents it is not funny anymore. It takes along time to load and fills more than two screens now, it needs a cull. - π 02:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey, pi bitch, that was my idea! Thanks for working it up, though. I guess you deserve the credit... ħuman 04:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Wait, Kels, your latest is doing well. Anyway, life is short but art is long. Didn't someone say that in Latin once? ħuman 04:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Ars longa, ad infinitum, which means "Art is long, but commercials go on forever". --Kels 04:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah... wait. Are you sure? Hehe, I chuckled in the cockles of my cups. ħuman 05:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

(EC)Nobody deserves any credit, this is a cooperative project. I must say the blank picture of Andy is polling well. May be we should have a new caption contest like they do on Wikiality for picture that are only kind of "ha" funny rather that "Ha HA!". - π 04:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Wow I always though Che Andy and the Glorious Republic of Conservapedia was a bit crap and a duplicate of Andyland, looks like the mob thought differently. - π 04:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

The reality is that most of these, well, aren't very good. And having too many of them brings the good ones down, too, I think. How about we drop the worst scoring 3 or 4 pics after a week, then re-intercom it, and continue with that process for a while? PS, just joking about the credity thing, Pi! ħuman 04:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Drop the low-scoring ones, and perhaps also anything that's in another article, like plain Andy pic - we don't need that in the gallery as well. Totnesmartin 07:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)he

KEEP: The IMMA CHARGIN GODSPEED, the andy with the huge forhead, the I kan haz gun, the Che Guschlafly, the Psycho, the pillow fortress, the I can haz influence, the Andy card, and the defensive weapon of YOU LOOKIN AT ME.

KILL: Mr. Bean, rejected CP promotion, Andy Nazi, Andy as the creepy woman, Andy as a kid, JM sketching, Assfly Xmas, Twoface, shining Bible verse Andy, and Mt. Assfly.

The Emperor _{Kneel before Zod!} 17:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

I'd say the simplest would be to keep all those that run positive - or, say, better than -5. Let's let the voting keep going for a bit though? And intercom it once in a while? ħuman 04:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

PS, I do think that the "best 15" is a good choice. ħuman 04:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Slight cock up

These two were inadvertently given the same poll number

• 

  "Wrong thinking is punished, right thinking is just as swiftly rewarded. You'll find it an effective combination."
  

  2

  Funny?

• 

  Long liev teh revolushun!
  

  16

  Funny?

Are they both worth keeping? - π 23:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

We'll know soon enough. Probably, since they ended up highly positive, right? Unless people voted one up and ignored the other one. ħuman 00:13, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I think people were voting for both. They were well ahead of the others. - π 00:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Plain Andy should be first. Makes more sense. -- 00:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I conCUR. The Emperor _{Kneel before Zod!} 00:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

It is only funny because of everything we did with it first, otherwise it is just a regular picture. - π 00:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

No, it serves the purpose of demonstrating what Andy actually looks like'. The Emperor _{Kneel before Zod!} 00:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

His picture is at the top of the page, either way I don't really care it is not that important. - π 00:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Deceit?

Does it count if he truly believes in the stuff he said? Example: he has no problem in beliving "no logical problem in Jesus raised from the dead", so I think he can convince himself to believe in anything. Hence, if he convinced himself to believe in things before he says it, I don't think that counts as deceit. Maybe stupidity will suffice. [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 16:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

"Never assign to deception that which can be adequately explained by stupidity", or something like that. Yeah. ħuman 21:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Sections

This article is also 26 articles long, the bio and end stuff is fine, but some this needs to go

1. Activities on Conservapedia
2. Andy and "information"
3. Deceit
   1. Further accusation of deceit
4. Andy and legal incompetence
5. Difficulty with grammar & spelling
6. Faith
7. Mental strength
8. The cocoa edit
9. The Sunday sermon
10. Pwnage
11. Publications Hate filled rants
12. Argumentation style
    1. Direct access to truth
13. People who think Andy smaht
14. Praise and respect for Andy
15. Honors
16. Gallery of deceitful liberal mockery
17. Did you know?
18. Known aliases
19. Top ten things overheard at Andy Schlafly's wedding
20. Top ten things overheard on The Schlafly's 24th wedding anniversary party
21. Top ten things overheard at the Schlafly family barbecue

Which of these should stay, which could go to another article and which should be consigned to the dust bin? - π 08:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I dunno what should be removed (the top ten lists?), but I see no reason to move things about AS out of the article to elsewhere. Why does it being so long bother you? We have a lot to say about him from over two years of close observation... ħuman 18:58, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Lack of lulz mostly. I tend to find that attempts of humour that fail make other funny things around them less appealing. - π 01:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

I know you care and mean well. Trouble is, probably no-one wants to go through this tripe/brilliange to improve. I care too though :) If you want to point me at things that fail, here, I will be happy to opine in generally useless ways. ħuman 04:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

I ditched the last three sections as they are not funny, the titles are inconsistent and I remember them having spelling and punctuation errors and they are very unfunny. - π 12:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Just asking

Would it be unfair to post slander about him? e.g. he touched me in my naughty spots? Kwilky 00:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes. It would also be slanderous. ħuman 00:53, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

that is unfortunate. he did make me cry though. well his website. it was similar to being violated. Kwilky 01:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Radio re Conservative Bible Project

LOL!!!--Star trooper man 22:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Has anyone else heard the irony meter pegging?

I am almost certain this is not an original idea, but the thought has occurred to me that Andy tries so hard to be what he denounces; i.e., a scholar. Sort of hating what you want to secretly be, in his case a university professor (I'm guessing) He reminds me of an unpopular kid I knew in elementary school who made stuff up so completely outrageous (presumably for the attention) other kids would beat him up. Andy is so pathetic he's almost pitiful, yet his unwarranted arrogance just makes me want to see him crash and burn in infinite humiliation. What a tool... Historygeek2007 13:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Well he claims to have been an adjunct professor himself. Perhaps the "real" professors looked down on him in some way and he still holds a grudge, just like how Obama beat him (most likely) in the Harvard Law Review elections. Генгис^{Is the Pope a Catholic?} 14:22, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Not fair

I welcome constructive criticism, but not lies. --Andrew Schlafly (talk) 05:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Then you'll love this article: Andrew Schlafly! larron^{sicut fur in nocte} 06:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

"I welcome constructive criticism"... well, at least we know whoever posted this isn't Andy-pandy. --PsygremlinKhuluma! 10:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Conservapedia Motto

Is it just me, or does 'The truth shall set you free' reek of Auschwitz- Arbeit macht frei (work shall set you free) Tweety (talk) 19:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Nonsense. That line is from the Bible, specifically John 8:32. You might also want to familiarize yourself with this. Colonel of Squirrels^{白山羊不山羊。商讨。} 20:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Oops, didn't realise that. Not being a Christian, I don't waste my time on the bible. And don't get me wrong, I wasn't using reductio ad hitlerum, it's just every time I see that motto, it reminds me of arbeit macht frei. That's all :) Tweety (talk) 20:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Andy and emus

Just joined RW and found this article straight away. It's a joy. Andy reminds me very much of Roger Ramjet. I was on Conservapedia for a while for something to do, and one of the things I did (and it still gives me a warm glow, is to make a couple of additions to the Emu article there (I'm an Australian, you see). I added a story about how emus used to kick down farm toilets and also an absurd account of how the marsupials banded together and made the long trek from Noah's Ark to Australia. It was gratifying to see it stay there for some time. Eventually, it was removed. And guess who overrode that decision and had my contribution reinstalled? Why, it was none other than Andy himself. Which is why I have a soft spot for old Ramjet. Though probably not as soft as the one between his ears. Have a look [here] Birdie num num (talk) 10:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Andy's Laugh

Should there be a video clip of him laughing on his page as an example of its annoyance? I found this video which just shows him laughing on his interview with Stephen Colbert: (Video moved to page) The video itself however might be a little big on the page. Maybe a link to it would be better? --BradT 01:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Someone could create and upload a sound clip of that, that would take up considerably less space. --Onion^talk/edits 01:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I forgot about the ability to change the width of the video, but I suppose a sound clip would be just as good as the video. --BradT (talk) 01:32, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

PUT VIDEO ON PAGE. ħuman 03:28, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I think we should also determine where the video should go first. I've noticed that under "Self-Parody" on his page there's a mentioning of the Colbert Report. It also mentions his annoying laugh. Should it go there? Possibly in a subcategory under it? --BradT (talk) 05:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I'll just put it in there with the words "the most annoying laughs in the history of television." above it to quote the quote just above it. Feel free to move it or change it into a sound clip if you find it necessary. --BradT (talk) 05:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I think what you did was just fine. And the link to the entire interview is a nice touch, too. ħuman 01:26, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Princeton alum

A search of the Princeton alumni database confirms that Schlaffers graduated in 1981, with a degree in electrical engineering (and that he married another member of the class of 1981, and that he has a child attending Princeton now). Looks like this claim is legit. He's probably not the most loathsome Princeton alum (he has to contend with Rumsfeld, among others), but he's certainly up there ^{— Unsigned, by: 173.21.226.228 / talk / contribs}

Thanks, but I think we knew that already. ħuman 04:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Yeah it is a joke, parodying his equally silly claim about Obama. - π 13:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Three separate articles...

I understand--and totally supported--the idea of two Andy articles, one satirical, and one a serious critique designed to show potential homeschoolers what they were dealing with. Now we have a silly one, a sillier one in the Fun space, and a serious one. Why? Is it clear what goes in which silly one? Why are there things that appear in both satirical articles? Can we go back to a two-article paradigm, or have some sort of clarity as to why we need two satirical articles and what goes where?PFoster 16:53, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

To avoid confusion, can we keep the discussion about this in one place? weaseLOId~ 17:51, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

Well, sure--to avoid confusion, can we keep all our silly stuff about Andy in one place? PFoster 17:54, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

I ain't gonna keep fucking repeating myself on this issue. I've spelt it out about three times on the talk page linked above. I'm not got waste time typing out again here. If you want to discuss further, follow the link above. weaseLOId~ 17:57, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

My point exactly. PFoster 17:59, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

This article is ridiculous and pointless. I vote for deletion. Salvage any yuks we need and jam them into the funspace article.DogP 17:42, 1 February 2009 (EST)

Fine by me. The "Andy is a Muslim" crap is already duplicated here, although I really think it belongs in fun, essay or the bin. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 17:49, 1 February 2009 (EST)

Why...

...is the entire "sensible" article at the bottom of the page? Yours truly^{Dear Sir} 17:47, 1 February 2009 (EST)

It's a transclusion error. This was built to display the same gallery as appears in the "satire" article, but everything's been moved umpteen times in the last two days so it's now transcluding the wrong article. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 17:49, 1 February 2009 (EST)

I don't believe it!

All I did was attempt to make Conservapedia a bit less radically conservative and Andrew Schlafly banned my account for five years! I did not even do any vandalism! ^{— Unsigned, by: Lefty / talk / contribs}

Yeah, that'll happen alright. Wëäŝëïöïď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 11:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

You did vandalise it. You tried to make it less radically conservative. ^theist 13:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Redirects

Under discussion here. Wėąṣėḷőįď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 06:20, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Should there be a link to Self projection as god? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

No, but thanks for stopping by. Ŵêâŝêîôîď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 17:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

His evil British twin brother?

Just saw this story on the ITV News at 6:30: (but using BBC as online source):

Somerset sex abuse teacher Nigel Leat 'extremely devious':

"A mother of children at a primary school where a teacher sexually abused pupils has branded the man "extremely devious".

The woman has spoken of parents' devastation on learning Nigel Leat was being investigated for sexually abusing children in his classroom."

AP (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)