Information icon.svg The 2018 RMF board election has started! We are electing 3 boardmembers for the 2018-2020 term.
Nominate users here and read their campaign slogans here!

Josip Broz Tito

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Tito telling you not to mess with him in 1961.
Join the party!
Communism
Icon communism.svg
Opiates for the masses
From each
To each
Stop sending people to kill me! We've already captured five of them, one of them with a bomb and another with a rifle... If you don't stop sending killers, I'll send a very fast working one to Moscow and I certainly won't have to send another.
—Letter from Tito found among the personal effects of Joseph Stalin[1]

Josep Broz Tito was the Communist ruler of Yugoslavia from the end of world War II until his death in 1980. Lauded by the West for his independence from Soviet influence (he broke with Stalin in 1949), he managed to keep his multi-ethnic state stable (both economically and politically), but by repressive means. This means that his reputation, enhanced during the terrible wars of the 1990s, is based partly on a willingness to look away from his faults. Yugoslavia under Tito had few freedoms but many friends, and his failure to solve the country's ethnic tensions must be looked on as his greatest fault. He did however, manage to create an organization evil pinko commie imperialist system called the "Non-aligned movement," which consisted of countries mainly in the developing world that claimed independence from both the United States and the Soviet Union in the Cold War.

Tito was actually a hard-line Marxist-Leninist, and when he led the Partisans, a guerrilla resistance movement against Axis occupation of Yugoslavia, he required the Partisans to take indoctrination classes in Stalinist ideology. With the Cold War in full swing when he broke from Stalin, the west trotted Tito out as a "reformed" and "moderate" leader they could court and work with. It should actually be noted that the initial cause of the split was Tito's taking a more hard-line position than Stalin in the immediate aftermath of World War II, specifically, Tito supporting the Communists in the civil war in Greece while Stalin failed to do so out of deference to his then-ally Winston Churchill, and Tito's desire to seize Trieste and incorporate it into Yugoslavia, also opposed by Stalin.

The USSR did not, or perhaps could not, invade Yugoslavia to bring it back into the Soviet orbit as they later did with immediately neighboring Hungary (1956), Czechoslovakia (1968), and Afghanistan (1979) when they also tried to steer an independent course from Moscow; geographic distance is probably the reason, as with the similarly successful break of Albania under Enver Hoxha from the Soviet orbit. Tito's Yugoslavia and Hoxha's Albania, however, were very different cases, with Hoxha taking an exceptionally hard Stalinist line and Tito trying to steer a course of being more moderate than the USSR, so they were not exactly allied with each other in any sense. Indeed, Hoxha denounced Tito louder than nearly anyone else as a "revisionist." After the break from the USSR, Yugoslavia under Tito largely abandoned the Soviet-style planned economy in favor of a "market socialist" economy of workers' self-management similar to syndicalism, although Yugoslavia remained a one-party Communist state. By all accounts it went much better, and remained stable until the fall of Yugoslavia.

Tito, however, failed to solve the country's long-standing ethnic feuds. After his death in 1980, Yugoslavia began to destabilize, breaking apart completely in 1991-1992 with several of the resulting countries undergoing civil wars along ethnic and religious lines.

On a more trivial note, he and Hermann Göring could have been body-doubles. Not that you'd have wanted to tell him that.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Robert Service, Stalin: A Biography (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2005), p. 592.