RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Andrew Wilson

Andrew Wilson | Result: Wiped

Andrew Wilson (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. This guy only has 28.8K followers on YouTube,[1] well-below our minimum of 100K (RationalWiki:Community Standards#Notability). Bongolian (talk) 18:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
2. Candidate for speedy deletion. There's no need to give this assclown any oxygen. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 19:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
3. Even if this guy was bigger, the stub doesn't even challenge his ideas. GeeJayK^{Where all evil dwells} _{Where every lie is true} 19:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
4. There are lots of grifters like this guy on youtube. I wouldn't want an article about him even if he had the requisite number of subs. He seems like a "heel" that debate-based podcasts use to represent the dumb-side of any argument.Ariel31459 (talk) 20:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Goat

• Isn't Matt Dillahunty kinda well known? Why would he debate this guy... (and why the f@ck would people watch them debate? Don't they know they can just watch porn instead? Are they stupid?) - Rairyu75 (Talk) 19:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

• As I said when I created the page, it wasn't clear to me if he warranted a page. I wasn't aware of the notability guidelines. I sort of just made this because I was infuriated by him one night. If it's not a page we should have, delete it. My only note is that it's worth mentioning is that from what I understand his channel has been growing pretty rapidly in the past few months. So he might warrant a page one day? But again, I don't care if it gets deleted. Monochroma (talk) 20:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)