RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/BioShock

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

BioShock | Result: Deleted[edit]

BioShock (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) โ€“ (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. not missional Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 11:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  2. agreed. its a synopsis and there is nothing to add. AMassiveGay (talk) 11:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  3. True. If there's anything missional about these games, it's not made clear here. Spud (talk) 12:54, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  4. "Hey it's political" is not a valid justification for having an article on this game. Cosmikdebris (talk) 13:58, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  5. Don't forget to delink from the Objectivism and Ayn Rand pages. The games aren't missional beyond perhaps a mention of their existence in those two pages, and certainly not worthy of a full article. Techpriest (I am Alpharius! / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 14:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  6. Agreeโ€”Delibirda the Annoying Grammar Nazi (talk) 15:09, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  7. -"Shut up, Brx." 15:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  8. -Flandres (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  9. Per all. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png ๐ŸŽ„LeftyGreenMario!๐ŸŽ„ 18:39, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  10. Maybe if it was better written. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosoliniโ€™s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 19:58, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
  11. Naked commercial promotion.๐”–๐”ฒ๐”ช๐”ช๐”ž ๐”„๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ข๐”ฌ๐”ฉ๐”ฌ๐”ค๐”ฆ๐” ๐”ž (๐”ฎ๐”ฒ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ข๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ) (๐”ฐ๐” ๐”ฏ๐”ฆ๐”ญ๐”ฑ๐”ฒ๐”ฏ๐”ž) 17:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]

Can we set a official precedent here that a video game(or film, or series) having a political message is not enough to give it a dedicated article?-Flandres (talk) 15:48, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm not in favor of bureaucracy and a giant list of rules. Each case involving the missionality of a particular article should be evaluated by the mob based on the stated mission of RationalWiki. Cosmikdebris (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
In practice, that's the case already. But, yeah. Let each media-related article stand or fall on its own merits. Spud (talk) 16:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Indeed, there is nothing in the mission statements that suggests that merely because something is political it merits an article. But, a number of political subjects involving authoritarianism or anti-science from either left or right would make the cut.Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 16:48, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

OK. I don't think this consensus is going to change. I'll wait 24 hours before deleting it just in case there are some late comments - I'll fix the links afterward. (Unless someone else wants to do the deed earlier.)Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 06:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)