There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Goat
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Goat | Result: For goat's sake no![edit]
Delete[edit]
- How is this to do with "Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience and the anti-science movement; Documenting the full range of crank ideas; Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism; Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media."? RationalPerson (talk) 14:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- The goat is our sacred cow! Spud (talk) 14:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Even us hardasses have to have a bit of humour. The living oxymoron (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- For the love of goat no! Christopher (talk) 14:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oh for goat's sake...--JorisEnter (talk) 14:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Goat goat goat goat, goat? Goat. Meh (You) 14:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- We must gave goat. --Cosmikdebris (talk) 20:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Love the goat. RoninMacbeth (talk) 15:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
- I do agree that the article isn't missional. This page should be moved to the funspace considering goat is basically a meme on RationalWiki.—チーズバーガー • めん
(talk • stalk) 15:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- HERESY Christopher (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
- I vote for the goat. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 15:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Your vote is admirable.—チーズバーガー • めん
(talk • stalk) 15:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Your vote is admirable.—チーズバーガー • めん